Preview

Is NAFTA good for America and Mexico?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
837 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Is NAFTA good for America and Mexico?
The NAFTA agreement and its impact on Mexican and US Farmers (corn products)
Is NAFTA good for America and Mexico?

The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is a tri-country agreement signed by the governments of Canada, Mexico, and the United States and come into affect on January 1st, 1994. Its primary purpose is to eliminate most barriers of trade and investment between the three countries. This also included many tariffs being removed immediately between the United States and Mexico, with others being phased out over periods of 5 to 15 years. Although there has been a dramatic increase in corn trade between the U.S. and Mexico since 1994, assessment of NAFTA’s contribution to this growth is difficult to measure. The impact of multiple factors, such as a series of severe droughts, domestic policy reforms, and environmental forces affecting the price, demand, and supply conditions in each trading country might have affected such enormous growth. On a positive note, NAFTA increased farm exports from the U.S. because it eliminated high Mexican tariffs. Mexico is the top export destination for beef, rice, soybean meal, corn sweeteners, apples and beans. It is the second largest for corn, soybeans and oils. As a result of NAFTA, the percent of U.S. agricultural exports to Mexico has grown by 242% since 1993. NAFTA eliminated trade barriers in nearly all highly regulated service and helped lower hidden costs of doing business by requiring governments to publish all regulations. One of the most important benefits of NAFTA has been to reduce U.S. reliance on oil imports from Middle East and dictatorships like Venezuela as oil can now be imported from Mexico at competitive rates due to elimination of tariffs. Lastly, NAFTA helped reduce investors' risk by guaranteeing they will have the same legal rights as local investors. Therefore investors can make now make legal claims against a government if it nationalizes their industry or takes their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The economic structure in Mexico opened an environment for businesses to open new satellite locations to take advantage of the land and labor costs. The United States entered into the North American Free Trade Agreement with Mexico. “The favorable terms of trade makes the Mexico import and export a profitable venture both for the domestic and…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to an article History of NAFTA from http://useconomy.about.com, Article 102 of the NAFTA agreement states the reasons for its inception. 1. Eliminate barriers to trade and facilitate the cross-border movement of goods and services. 2. Promote conditions of fair competition. 3. Increase investment opportunities. 4. Create procedures for the resolution of trade disputes. 5. Provide protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights. 6. Establish a framework for further trilateral, regional and multilateral cooperation to expand NAFTA’s benefits. 7. Grant the signatories Most Favored Nation status.…

    • 2468 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Maquiladoras Analysis Paper

    • 2395 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Although the Mexican maquiladora system is an important component of Mexico-US trade, the connection between the acceleration in maquiladora growth and the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) needs clarifications. Manufacturing in Mexico obligates American firms to comply with Mexico 's detailed labor regulations; however, increasing foreign investment requires that the Mexican Government attempt to make these regulations flexible enough not to scare off foreign investors. Consequently, as much as NAFTA may have increased economic benefits to the Mexican economy, the maquiladora development…

    • 2395 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Nafta

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages

    It has helped each country’s economy a lot. Mexico hasn’t benefited a lot from this agreement but since they have added internal reforms to the economy they have started to gain competitiveness and the platform that has been constructed mostly for exports and their manufacturing is also starting to become stronger. Even economists Jaime Serra Puche said “I think NAFTA has been excellent for Mexico.” Even politicians like Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton have said that NAFTA has been an excellent decision, Mexico, Canada and USA has made. They said it has a high value in todays society mainly because of all the new jobs the agreement has created. Bill Clinton said “NAFTA means jobs, and good paying jobs, if I didn’t believe that, I wouldn’t support this agreement”. In these next three paragraphs you’re going to hear about all the pros and cons that NAFTA has given Canada, USA, and…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mgt 448 Week 2 Paper

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages

    (NAFTA) North American Free Trade Agreement will be discussed between neighboring countries. Canada and the United Sates in this agreement have eliminated most of the tariffs that are incorporated in the trades of the products amongst these two regions. Effect in January 1, 1994, (NAFTA) has been a major force in increasing the agricultural trade among the two countries and it is the largest trade bloc in the world in terms of combined gross domestic product (GDP) of its members. Since implemented, the United States and Canada has been 112 percent. In addition, trades between these three countries have improved themselves over $333.8 billion throughout the existence of the unification (Kroll, 2005).…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    With over $400 Billion in trade last year it is inevitable that Canada and the United States are each others largest trading partners and more importantly, the largest trading relationship in the world. Trade relations between these two countries have amplified during the past decade through the 1994 implementation of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Nevertheless, the trading relationship between these two countries has not always been harmonious. Recent disputes over softwood lumber, beef and wheat have created a fair bit of animosity between Canada and the United States. Although the World Trade Organization (WTO) and even NAFTA have suggested promising dispute resolution provisions, there is still a fair bit of bitterness between these two parties. The focus of this paper is to evaluate the Canada-United States trade relationship and to focus more specifically on the three main commodities of concern; softwood lumber, beef and wheat. The conclusion of the paper will attempt to determine exactly where the future of this relationship lies and which country will fall victim to the Canada-United States trade dispute.…

    • 1314 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    NAFTA is categorized as one of the largest formed trading blocs. Despite the expansion and diversification in the economies of member states, there has been quite a number of setbacks as a result of the enactment of the trading platform. NAFTA'S focus was to reduce tariffs among member states namely Mexico, Canada, and the United States over the years, making it easier to trade goods across national borders, and increasing economic efficiency in North America.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Nafta

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In January 1, 1994, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), a state-of-the-art market-opening agreement, came into force. Since then, NAFTA has systematically eliminated most tariff and non-tariff barriers to trade and investment between Canada, the United States, and Mexico. By establishing a strong and reliable framework for investment, NAFTA has also helped create the environment of confidence and stability required for long-term investment. NAFTA was preceded by the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Canada part of NAFTA

    • 7446 Words
    • 30 Pages

    The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), signed by Prime Minister Brian Mulroney, Mexican President Carlos Salinas, and U.S. President George H.W. Bush, came into effect on January 1, 1994. Since 1993, NAFTA has generated economic growth and rising standards of living for the people of all three member countries. By strengthening the rules and procedures governing trade and investment throughout the continent, NAFTA has proved to be a solid foundation for building Canada’s future prosperity.…

    • 7446 Words
    • 30 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Canadian economy is determined largely by the United States economy threw the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the Free Trade Agreement (FTA). The North American Free Trade Agreement was an agreement that came into effect on January 1,1995 which involves Mexico, Canada and the United States of America. This agreement is said to produce 1 billion to 3 billion dollar gains in each country. NAFTA ensures that a certain amount of goods produced and traded between the three countries has to have a minimum percentage of its parts produced in North America.…

    • 2176 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nafta Thesis

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which became effective on January 1, 1994, demanded both the gradual and immediate elimination of most tariffs and other trade barriers on products and services traded between Mexico, Canada and the United States. While trade agreements could serve as vehicles to promote a more sustainable and just development, NAFTA did very little to safeguard our environment. NAFTA transferred enormous power from democratic governments to multi-national corporations and faceless global market forces - and today communities across North America are at a higher risk to dirtier air, unsafe drinking water, and food-borne illnesses.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nafta

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Maybe it improves the economy with the industrials of food. These industrials are very benefit because of NAFTA.…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shifting from the outer look to the inner look, there have been some interesting dynamics going on within NAFTA’s trade health as well. Weed is now legalized in 23 states of the U.S and Mexico, where weeds used to be sourced into America is witnessing a reverse flow of weed trade in North America according to the article “America’s Quality Pot is Changing the Drug War”. The U.S is increasingly less dependent on Mexican’s weed supply. In fact, the pot industry in the U.S is thriving to the level that it is intimidating that of Mexico. Though at higher prices, American weed is gaining preference and popularity in Mexico for its quality and variety. Before the legalization of marijuana in the U.S, weeds were sourced mainly from Mexico. Now, on…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The structural adjustment had massive implication and consequences in Mexico and the Philippines. According to Bello, the structural adjustment tore apart the traditional corn farmers of Mexico and turned a nation that was once the original place of corn domestication to a major corn importer. Furthermore, the creation of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) in an attempt to create liberalization of agricultural trade further displaced smallholder farmers. Policies imposed by the North have diverted the traditional farming practices of the peasant farmer that has existed for decades to commercial agricultural practices in an attempt to increase…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. Adding food-safety regulations into an extension of NAFTA is a good strategy in the quest to prevent food-related illnesses in imported foods. NAFTA does make is easier to trade and encourages faster, more frequent trade that cannot be monitored as well. Adding food-safety regulations can help NAFTA continue to be a positive and effective pact, while also making it safer for the people that consume the food that is traded under the agreement. NAFTA is a great opportunity for the countries in North America, but should not thrive at the expense of innocent consumers. The extension will benefit the innocent consumers by helping ensure their safety when ingesting food traded through NAFTA. A drawback of adding the extension to NAFTA is losing some of the advantages that are a part of the agreement like fast, easy, and cheap trade. Adding food-safety regulations will add more time to the trading process and more hurdles that producers have to jump to ensure their products adding time and cost to their processes.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays