Preview

Is Realism an Obsolete Theory, or Is It More Relevant Than Ever?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1871 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Is Realism an Obsolete Theory, or Is It More Relevant Than Ever?
Realism, as a way of interpreting international relations has often been conceived to be closely tied to the Cold War. Realism, rooted in the experience of World War II and the Cold War, is said to be undergoing a crisis of confidence largely because the lessons adduced do not convincingly apply directly to the new realities of international relations in the twenty-first century (Clinton 2007:1) Worse still, if policymakers steadfastly adhere to realist precepts, they will have to navigate “the unchartered seas of the post-Cold War disorder with a Cold War cartography, and blind devotion to realism could compromise their ability to prescribe paths to a more orderly and just system.” (Kegley 1993:141). This paper will demonstrate that this picture of realism is incomplete – realism is not an obsolete theory in contemporary international relations, but is indeed relevant - it can be, and has been applied in the twenty-first century. In order to prove this, the work of well-known political thinkers thought to be the precursors of realism, and the writings of present-day international relations analysts will be examined, and the core tenets of realism will be extracted. It will be argued that these root concepts of realist thought do not rely on the circumstances of the Cold War, and are thus not bound by its confines, with the possibility that these lessons retain their validity in addressing issues in the post-Cold War world of international relations.
A key tenet of realist thinking is the concept of power, or more specifically, ‘hard power’ and its uses within the realm of international relations. It is the ability to make other actors comply with a state’s will through the use of force and threat (Copeland 2010). With this key tenet, comes the realist notion of an ongoing balancing of power between states. Some have gone so far as to call it “the central theoretical concept of international relations” (Snyder 1984). This realist sentiment can easily

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    WK 5 Assignment

    • 2478 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The International Relations theory that best fits the Gini-out-of-the-bottle approach for this report is the theory of realism. There are five different classes of realism but the two that stands out to me are classic and neorealism. Classic realism leans towards those that represent a pessimistic view and the fact that people are not often what they appear to be and they it would behoove a government not to be so trusting of others. Neorealism represents the struggle of someone that is greedy for more such as power.…

    • 2478 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    POL114 Essay

    • 2371 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The United States of America is a hegemonic power which has great influence in international politics due to its contributions to history. President Barrack Obama said in his speech at the United States Military Academy at West Point, “…America must always lead on the world stage. If we don’t, no one else will.” When it comes down to which country holds greater influence in the international system, America is known in being a hegemon which has influence in many international institutions. The United States of America took the lead in founding the United Nations and contributes the most money towards the UN’s spending, thus shapes the UN in favour of its interests. This concept of hegemony was analyzed by Gramsci, whom used Machiavelli’s view of power as a centaur, “half man and half beast”, to argue power is a mixture of coercion and consent which are tools for hegemonic states which is what realists agree with1. In this sense, the United States has been using such “tools” to seek national interest. Thus, by examining Obama’s speech through Realist, Liberal and Marxist/critical perspectives, this essay will argue that the perspective of realism best defines America’s position in the global order through its consecutive use of hard power.…

    • 2371 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is progressive realism? According to Smith, these are the premises. One, implicit boundaries on the notions of nation-states. Two, non-state actors and international organizations play significant roles. Three, state preferences, are the prime determinant of international behavior. Four, states do not necessarily compete with each other. Five, cooperation can yield mutual gains for participating states, even military power, is not always the most effective means to guarantee survival and security (Smith, 2013 p.336).…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    She suggests that different understandings of peace and order have affected states' willingness to intervene forcibly in other states, and aims to describe how changing beliefs and norms are the cause. Finnemore’s main thesis is that realist theory cannot make sense of how modern day interventions take place, because the…

    • 136 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Realism is conservative and negative. Realists plan for durability of the current international state of affairs. Liberalism is progressive and hopeful. Liberals believe change is necessary and inevitable. Both realism and liberalism contain truths. Liberal’s hopeful view of international politics is based on these beliefs: liberals consider states to be the main actors in international politics, they emphasize that the internal characteristics of states vary, and that these differences have extreme effects on state behavior. Liberals also believe that calculations about power matter little for explaining the behavior of good states.…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    International Relations

    • 2065 Words
    • 9 Pages

    To begin with, security is heart of every foreign policy of any state but the question of what constitutes being secure, security breach or generally in what context security shall be viewed opens doors to a lot of interpretations. Realists view the concept of security from a traditional perspective, which meant military, war to mention a few (Lawson, 2003: 80). This is the underlying idea behind the security that the realists seem to be addressing. As they believe in an anarchic international system where the state is the actor which is power hungry, self-serving and only concerned with its survival, their view of security has everything to do with the respective state in the international community. In other words the state fights for its protection and survival in the international sphere through war or military prowess. But the application of this theory in a quiet and peaceful world becomes problematic. A good example is now that there is peace, how does one explain peace. Even though the realists explain the peace time as being an artificially construed and temporary thing, and war being natural way the international sphere, their argument does not hold much water especially when met with liberalist views on International relations. One must stress out that the realist theory was a very much accepted and may even still be accepted because…

    • 2065 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cold War

    • 4652 Words
    • 19 Pages

    For Americans and many in the world, the Cold War dominated international relations from 1945-1991. Only the nuclear balance of terror prevented this uneasy peace from becoming all out war, and few if any events could be understood outside of the context of this bipolar rivalry. As the Cold War came to an end, some thought we had witnessed "an end to history."(1) Instead, we have witnessed a fundamental change in the logic of world politics. The United States has had difficulty developing a clear and coherent foreign policy in this new era. The New World Order of President Bush and the strategy of engagement and enlargement of President Clinton seem vague and ambiguous when compared to the clarity and simplicity of the American policy of containment during the Cold War. While this policy of containment rapidly gained a consensus both among the American foreign policy elite as well as the mass public after World War Il, it did represent a fundamental shift of relations with the Soviet Union from one of wartime cooperation. Explaining the origins of the Cold War has been one of the most common and contested topics in the study of American diplomatic history, and the end of the Cold War has changed how historians examine and interpret this period. Increasingly, scholars have gained access to documents, especially on the Soviet side, that have allowed them to go beyond past conjecture and utilize archival evidence. The end of the Cold War has removed much of the passion that surrounded writing Cold War history while scholars and states were still living it. This increased detachment has allowed historians to move from placing blame to recognizing the ideological conflict that was at the center of the Cold War's origins.…

    • 4652 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Joseph Nye Soft Power

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the 18th Century, Thomas Jefferson stated, “the less we use our power, the greater it will be” and this concept was echoed over 200 years later by Joseph Nye in his 2004 book, “Soft power”. This essay will delve into the effectiveness of Nye’s concept of “soft power” in 21st century international relations, highlighting the cases of its use in the process.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Cold War Analysis

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In The Cold War: A New History, Gaddis reinterprets the historical record of the conflict; his sixth chapter, “Actors,” focuses on the role that individuals played in the end of the struggle. Toward this aim, he discusses how both strengths and weaknesses of world leaders such as Reagan and Gorbachev had a profound impact on the international system during the late twentieth century. Gaddis’s consideration of “the importance and vulnerability of individuals in history. . .” extends the limits of the structural-realist philosophy through which he became known (Gaddis 2005, 123). He does not, however, abandon realism completely. Instead, Gaddis enriches his account of the Cold War by acknowledging the confluence of individual action and…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Characterize the differences between the world before 1945 and the world after that year with respect to international relations.…

    • 3796 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sovereign states have the only power to conduct foreign affairs, since businesses are not involved in signing treaties or in creating law that is applicable to sovereign states. Hence, the operation of treaties is fueled primarily by the interests of the state. The realist perspective supports this claim because it boils down to a state’s interest and the conscious decisions states make. For instance, treaties could lead to opportunities in attracting foreign business through international relations. Even though there is a chance of increasing one’s economy, it can have large impacts on the…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Rise to Realism

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Define the term "Muckraker." Be sure to include the name of the person who created it.…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Rise of Realism

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. Define the term "Muckraker." Be sure to include the name of the person who created it.…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This article deals with terms which are traditionally regarded as mutually exclusive: realism and progress. E.H. Carr famously summed up the stark opposition between realism and what he calls utopianism. What differentiates these two approaches at the most fundamental level is their stance on the future of international relations. While utopianism is characterized by hope that progress is always at hand, realism contends that politics is a struggle for power and ⁄ or survival, and depicts…

    • 8353 Words
    • 34 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Syria Conflict Essay Example

    • 2671 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Several general realist ideas and assumptions were discussed (Jackson, 2010). These are related to different aspects such as pessimistic view of human nature; international conflicts that are ultimately resolved by war, high regard for the values of national security and state survival and basic…

    • 2671 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays