Preview

Is The Electoral Process Fair

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
195 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Is The Electoral Process Fair
Election Process “The election process is fair. It's something that our forefathers worked out very specifically. While it doesn't seem fair that our votes don't count as a "popular vote," the way its set up, and the Electoral College actually chooses the President, this is the way it has always been done.” A lot of U.S. citizens can argue that our election process is not fair because it does not go by popular vote. Our voting process consists of the Electoral College. The electoral collage is a process that will decide who the president of the United States will be. I do think that our election process is fair that’s the way it’s been for years and it works out great. Our election process consists of the Electoral College. The Electoral

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    I understand why you are torn when comes to gerrymandering, but for me I don’t think it’s fair. As the the definition of gerrymandering it is “redistricting to benefit a particular group”. What I really don’t like about it, is states get divided the way the congress wants and it changes at every . Even if the states gets redistricting in a weird way and it doesn’t make sense by looking at the map, as long as the district ends up with equal population. I don’t think the way it’s proportioned to make sure that one party has a greater chance of getting elected is right. It’s like if you live there and you end up in a population that you don’t belong in, you may have to move. I don’t think I should have to move, just to belong in the same party…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some people disagree with the Electoral College because they believe the system gives an unfair advantage to states with a large electoral vote. For example, there can be a candidate that does not get one single vote in, but they can still be elected by winning the popular vote in the bigger states, that have more number of electoral voters. Even if a candidate wins the majority of the smaller states, they will not win presidency because it does not have enough electoral votes. A candidate may have a high overall popular vote; however the one who wins is the one with the highest electoral…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Electoral College is an institution that may have served a purpose 200 years ago when the founding fathers needed a system that would be met with approval by both large and small states. The Electoral College is a flawed method of electing our President that has created problems in previous elections and is likely to be the source of problems in the future. The Electoral College provides an undemocratic method of choosing our president that potentially undermines the will of the voters. Not only can a candidate be elected without actually winning the most votes, it puts our elections at the mercy of electors who don't always cast their vote as pledged. I intend to demonstrate that the problems inherent in this voting method far outweigh any benefits it may provide. Replacing the winner-take-all method of awarding electoral votes with a system such as proportional representation or eliminating the college altogether in favor of direct election is the best way to ensure a trouble-free and fair election…

    • 2120 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Is The Electoral College A Fair And Equitable Way To Elect The President Of The United States?…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    We have an Electoral College, which is not recent but is against his philosophy. The Electoral College has representatives that give votes depending on the majority in that state. However, they don’t have to vote how the people voted they can vote their own way. As seen in the 2000 election where the people in Florida voted for Al Gore but the representatives voted for…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In my opinion our votes don’t matter because of the Electoral College Voting system and’ i think it should. I feel this way because the nominee that wins the race, wins by the Electoral College votes. This indicates that our votes don’t matter and a prime example is Hillary Clinton won the popular vote…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The founding fathers were not gods. Consequently, they were not perfect, and neither were the systems they set up to run the country. Nevertheless, they knew that things would change, and they set up ways to fix the government when needed. In the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson wrote that the American people have the right to alter or abolish the government if it does not fit their needs. The Electoral College is flawed, and the American people need to replace it because this system does not fairly represent the people, it forces people to vote a certain way, and it does not always guarantee that the winner of the popular vote will win the election. These imperfections in the Electoral College make voters feel like their votes…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Imagine if you cast a ballot in the last election and after you cast your ballot you find out that the President was chosen by 538 delegates each from all different states. This is reality and that process is called the electoral college. The electoral college should be abolished because it does not reflect the common Americans opinion, also the process has not worked as there were many unqualified Presidents, finally, the delegates that elect the President are all very partisan towards their party…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The argument here is that voters should be able to directly vote for their next president instead of merely providing a suggestion as to who the Electoral College should vote for. By not having a direct election for president “electors [can potentially] deny the will of the people and vote for whomever they please” (Plumer). By getting rid of the Electoral College it would remove the sense of “winner takes all” because every person who votes would have their own say so in the…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The electoral college in america should be abolished because it has major flaws, supports political inequality, and doesn’t support third party candidates. On top of the flaws that already exist in the electoral college the biggest flaws is what happens when there is a tie. In the case of a tie the decision of who gets to be president is cast in the House of Representatives. This would mean that every states essentially has one vote making “the single representative from Wyoming, representing 500,000 voters, [the same] as the 55 representatives from California, who represent 35 million voters”(Document F). This is important because if you just look at the numbers say Wyoming is the smallest states with 500,00 then any state with more voters that excess amount of voters basically don’t get a vote. In this case 34.5 million voters don’t get a vote. In addition to this example of political inequality, political inequality is seen in the number of electors each state receives. One example of this would be how a candidate could win the electoral vote by winning only 11 states, completely ignoring the Northeast United States(Document A). As a result of candidates only needing 11 states, bigger states have more influence than small states with only 3 votes making them less important. Yet even though 11 states have more influence than the others they really should have more because the electoral vote doesn’t truly represent population. For instance, in Illinois there are about 12 million people and they have 20 electors. Whereas in 12 smaller…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The electoral college was put in place by our founding fathers in the Constitution. The electoral college is a process that we undergo to elect our president. Every four years, American citizens vote for their preferred presidential candidate. Their votes, however, go to that state’s candidate electors, rather than straight towards the presidential election. Electors pledge to vote for the candidate and then vote for president based on the party they previously pledged to. Electors are chosen based on their loyalty to the party they belong to and American citizens indirectly vote for the elector who pledged their vote to a certain candidate. The electoral college was created for a purpose and is flawed…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Electoral College should not be abolished, because if it is then the election process would collapse. The Electoral College was created because “normal citizens” were not deemed worth of voting because they would not know what or who they were voting for. The system is built in a way that is complicated, but it works, here is how it works: all US states and DC get one electoral vote for each of their US Senators and Representatives. The Representatives’ votes are determined by the decennial census, and the US Senators have 2 per state. There are 538 votes in the Electoral College and all the candidate needs to get to win is 270 votes. This is a system that has been around since the Constitutional Convention, so why is there any reason to change it. The reason that it has been around for so long is because the Electoral College was made so that the two major political parties would have an advantage against the minority or third parties. They did this because the third parties focus too much on one issue and that would be disastrous for our government. But third parties do deserve to still be in the…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Electoral College system was first established in the constitution by the Founding Fathers. The creation of Electoral College is to make sure every states is a viable participant in electing the president, in which giving the small population states a chance. In the day of election, people cast their votes for their candidate and who wins it determines the electors of the state. The system was great when it was first introduced because of how people before relied more in the electors who are very educated and wise, but now people are different has gained more knowledge and can determine who will be a good president. Although electoral college has served the United States since 1787, it has become unfair because it ignores the will of the people, it creates faithless electors, and it gives too much power to the smaller states.…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Electoral College is the current system America uses to elect the president. How this systems works is when you vote, you aren’t really voting, you are telling an elector where you would like your vote to go to. Once everyone has voted, the elector votes for a candidate based on the votes of the people. There are anywhere from three to about 55 electors per state. I believe this system should be replaced with the popular vote method.…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    That is why I agree with the Electoral College. I think it is the best and fair way to run the election. The Electoral College has performed over 50 presidential elections. I think that the Founding Fathers were trying to let everyones vote count. It contributes to the cohesiveness of the country by requiring a distribution of popular support to be elected…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays