Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Jefferson and Madison Presidencies

Good Essays
831 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Jefferson and Madison Presidencies
During the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison (1801-1817), a dual political party government was starting to form. In the Constitution, which was made in 1787, it is portrayed Jeffersonian Republicans as strict constructionists and Federalists as broad ones. It is true that the Democratic-Republicans believed in the strict construction of the constitution and a weaker federal government, thinking that if there were high concentration of central government, it would lead to a loss of individual and state rights. Madison and Jefferson were two members of this political party, with Jefferson being known as the founder and leader of it. The Federalists, on the other hand, believed that a stronger central government was needed and the Articles of Confederation were too weak. The Democratic-Republican Party (also known as Anti-Federalists) began because of groups that opposed Alexander Hamilton’s fiscal policies. These groups were organized into a party in the mid-1790s by Jefferson and Madison, but it wasn’t until 1800 though that they had a breakthrough and began taking control of the Presidency and Congress. Meanwhile, the Federalist Party was on a slow decline because of Hamilton and Adams not being there anymore and was eventually destroyed as a political force after the Hartford Convention (1814-1815). The meeting was held to discuss several constitutional amendments needed to protect New England’s interests (Document E). This left a short break from political debates and competition, known as the “Era of Good Feeling”.
The Federalist Party was made in the first Washington administration to support the fiscal policies of Hamilton and came to support a strong national government, loose constitution, and a more industrial, less agricultural economy. John Adams and Alexander Hamilton were among its leaders. They were doing well until the Democratic-Republicans took over Congress and the Presidency in the “Revolution of 1800”. After that, they continued to decline and died off at the end of the War of 1812.
From 1801-1809, Thomas Jefferson ran the presidency as a strict constitutionalist who reminded the people that the majority couldn’t have all of the power, but the minority needed to be tended to also. He was a great advocate of equality and liberty and knew that people had their own rights, such as the right to having your own religious preference and being able to follow it without the government choosing it for you (Document B). Jefferson also kept in mind that as times would change, so would the government and its needs. As he write in 1816: “I know…. that laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind” (Document G). This was a very mature thing for him to remember at that time, to not only think about the present but also to make room for future changes.
While Jefferson did help to found the Republican-Democratic party, many of the decisions he made in office favored a strong central government and strong executive power, which seems to be a clear characteristic of the Federalist Party. However, he also cut back the government’s size and reduced its expenses.
While James Madison was president from 1809-1817, he was well known for his abilities in foreign affairs during a time when Britain and France were on the brink of war with us. He also made sure that the government would use power fairly and not inflict it or problems on the people as a burden. During a proposed tariff in 1816, it was reminded that “power was given to Congress to regulate commerce and equalize tariffs on the whole of the United States” and that “it is unjust to aggravate the burdens of the people for the purpose of favoring the manufacturers” (Document F). Madison also managed to keep in mind that nothing drastic should be done unless approved, such in the case of a network for transportation. As Madison said to Congress concerning an Internal Improvements Bill: “such a power is not expressly given by the Constitution and believing that it can not be deduced from any part of it without an inadmissible latitude of construction…I have no opinion but to withhold my signature from it” (Document H).
Jefferson and Madison were accomplished men during their presidencies that also understood that collaboration could be helpful. They worked together and focused on national issues that highlighted their philosophies and published these as letters known as The Adams-Jefferson Letters. The first formation of political parties was in process and they ran the early Democratic-Republican Party well. The parties started out opposite of each other with the Democratic Republicans wanting an agriculture-based economy and a loose government, as to allow for the central government to not take away from personal and state rights; and as the Federalists, who mostly lived in New England and wanted a strict, tight government, but died out after the leaders left, the Hartford Convention, and the War of 1812.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In general, the Federalists were those who supported a stronger centralized government. The Federalist movement was motivated by the idea that the national government under the Articles of Confederation was too weak and that a new, stronger form of government must replace it. The founder of this party was Alexander Hamilton, George Washington's Secretary of the Treasury during his first term as President. Hamilton's network of supporters grew into what would become the Federalist Party. Hamiltonian Federalists wanted a fiscally sound and nationalistic government that would intervene in the economy. Hamilton's proposal toward this…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By both definition and widespread perception the Jeffersonian-Republicans were strict constructionists, meaning they closely followed the framework of the Constitution. On the other hand, the belief was that Federalists, who thought the Constitution was open for interpretation, were loose constructionists. Although both the presidencies of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison (Democratic-Republicans) mainly supported these theories, they, like other politicians of the time, often made exceptions to their “policies.”…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the time the Constitution was written there were two different parties that wanted different things from the United States government. The Revolutionaries or “Radicals”, led by men such as Thomas Jefferson, Sam Adams and Patrick Henry, emphasized the strength and efficiency in government. These were the men who wanted Liberty and the Bill of Rights. The other famous group was the Federalists, which consisted of Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay. These leaders were more concerned with popular aspects of society such as power, control, and the protection of property rights. In order to keep maintain their wealth, they supported a strong central government, much like the current British system. Both parties contained some of the boldest and most radical thinkers of their time, helping make the Constitution last over 200…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the beginning of the country's political growth, the United States was divided into two basic political parties known as the Federalists and the Jeffersonian Republicans. While Jefferson and Madison's presidencies were opposed by the Federalists, some of their contributions supported the Federalist Party's beliefs.. While Jefferson and Madison's decisions in office were mainly based of off a strict construction of the constitution, some decisions came from a loose construction. These loose construction decisions can be seen in the Louisiana Purchase and Jefferson and Madison's support of the national bank.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The perception that Federalists were loose constructionists and that Jeffersonian Republicans were very strict constructionists was very well founded, but not accurate 100% of the time. The presidency of Thomas Jefferson mainly supported the theory that the Jeffersonian Republicans were strict constructionists. James Madison's presidency supported that theory as well. Both presidents, however, made exceptions to their general policies when an issue was just too big to fit inside the tiny box of their shared school of thought.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Following the War of 1812, the Federalist Party’s demise was sealed during the Hartford Convention in 1815. This allowed the Era of Good Feelings to commence and America was united under a new political party, the Democrats. Although, the Era of Good Feelings came to an end during the Election of 1824, numerous changes such as, increases in voting participation and the beginnings of how political candidates appealed to the common man affected elections and political campaigns from 1815 to 1840.…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 1801 and 1817, the two parties the Jeffersonian Republicans and Federalists seemed to have changed their views on the issue of whether the constitution should be loosely interpreted, or strictly interpreted. The Democratic-Republicans originally prided themselves in having strict constructionist beliefs, but however, as time went on, they seemed to have adopted a broader outlook. The Federalists, who favored a looser perspective on the interpretation of the construction, adopted a more strict interpretation. Whenever the members of these parties had to change their perspective in order to suit their needs, they seemed to have no qualms in doing so.…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison, Republicans, such as Jefferson were seen as strict constructionists of the Constitution while Federalists, like Madison, were generally looser with their interpretations of the Constitution's literal meaning. While the constructionist ideas were part of what separated the two parties from one another, Jefferson and Madison are both guilty of not adhering to these ideas on many occasions. Jefferson writes in a letter to Gideon Granger expressing his idea that the United States is too large to have only one central government, and the states should receive more power, which goes against the fact that the Constitution was created in order to unite a new country. Also, when passing the Embargo Act, Jefferson demonstrates the federal power over the people, which goes against his Republican belief of allowing the states to have more power. As Madison prepares for his term in office, the citizens of the United States were most likely expecting him to be more open to suggestion in his interpretations of the Constitution. However, during a speech by Daniel Webster, a Federalist speaking on behalf of the entire Federalist Party, and a veto on internal improvements, Madison proves that he truly is not a loose constructionist as his party would have preferred him to be. Both Madison and Jefferson are guilty of frequently going against the general ideas of their parties in order to meet their needs at a certain time.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the 1800's, Jeffersonian Republicans thought that the federal government’s power was confined to the grants of the Constitution. On the other hand, the Federalists believed in the broad construction that gave the government any power that was not forbidden by the constitution. Despite the fact that the Jeffersonian Republicans believe in a strict interpretation of the Constitution, and Federalists believe in a loose interpretation, these beliefs were misrepresented according to the party’s views on the authority of the government during the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison. During this time, the Jeffersonian Republicans beliefs were inverted with the beliefs of the Federalists. The Jeffersonian Republicans leaned toward a loose interpretation and the Federalists leaned toward a strict one.…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With many different views on how to run the government, it was hard to depict which parties’ group would be the strongest and the best fit to control the country: the Federalists’ or the Democratic-Republicans. The Federalists’ wanted a very strong government to bring together the bickering states. On the other hand, the Democratic-Republicans pictured more independent state governments to rule the people. Although they didn’t agree on many things they did have one idea in common, such as, both parties wanted to follow the Constitution, but in different ways.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hamiltonian Federalism- Alexander Hamilton wanted to form a strong union with the states and federal government. He sought an increase in the power/control of the federal government over the individual states. Hamilton also wanted a bank of the State so that loans could be put out to manufacturers and commercial enterprises. He felt like it was necessary to create a large national debt so that the government's credit would be built up over time. Finally, he wanted to place/raise tariffs on foreign goods to promote American manufacturing and the affordability of the products.…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the 1700’s, the first political parties formed over disagreements in the government. The two parties were the federalists and Antifederalists. Federalists made up the people who felt that the stronger government was better for the country and supported the Constitution. The federalists had felt as if different “fiscal and monetary policies” were a weakness for the national economy. Also, the federalists supported banking("Anti-Federalist vs Federalist"). Federalists wanted to fight for stronger governments, managing the country’s debt and ratification. Antifederalists were people who opposed the Constitution of 1788 and disagreed with a stronger federal government. The Antifederalists wanted to keep the power to be for states and local…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    "There is nothing I dread so much as a division of the Republic into two great parties, each arranged under its leader and converting measures in opposition to each other. This...is to be dreaded as the greatest political evil under our Constitution."1 This view, expressed by John Adams, was not shared by all, namely Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson. As the early American government began to form, so did the two major political parties. Alexander Hamilton was the founder of the Federalist Party, while Thomas Jefferson led the Anti-Federalists in response.2 Both men used their prominence in each party to their advantage to influence the public and their disputes created controversy and discordance between the parties and the American people. Hamilton and Jefferson had many disagreements throughout their careers and had radically different opinions on what their new country should be like.…

    • 1602 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    By 1817 the great American experiment was in full swing. America was developing into an effective democratic nation. However as the democracy continued to grow, two opposing political parties developed, the Jeffersonian Republicans and the Federalists. The Jeffersonian Republicans believed in strong state governments, a weak central government, and a strict interpretation of the Constitution. The Federalists saw it differently. They opted for a powerful central government with weaker state governments, and a loose interpretation of the Constitution. The seemingly solid divide between Federalist and Republican would begin to blur during the presidencies of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. For, neither Republican president was able lead the nation with purely republican ideals.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The first political party system includes the Federalists v. Democratic Republicans. The Federalists, led by John Adams and Alexander Hamilton, believed in a strong national government. They wanted to create a Constitution. They argued that government power should be used to promote economic development through a national bank. Democratic-Republicans, were led by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. They supported a weaker national government. They feared that federal involvement in the economy would benefit only a few wealthy northeasterners, and they thought that agriculture should still be the country's economic source. The second party system which included the Democrats v. Whigs differs from the first political party. Whigs, led by…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays