Preview

jljlk

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
343 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
jljlk
ALAT – ALAT SANGGUL

SISIR SASAK SEDANG
SISIR NB
JEPIT BEBEK
JEPIT SSS ( ADA PENTULNYA )
BONEKA SANGGUL
CEPOL / SANGGUL TEMPEL
JEPIT PINKEL
ROLL LENGKET
HAIR SPRAY
HAIR NET
HAIR PIN
AKSESORIS SANGGUL
Because King Philip's desire to make Spain the dominant power in sixteenth-century Europe ran counter to Queen Elizabeth's insistence on autonomy for England, ------- was -------.
D) conflict . . inevitable

The word "because" indicates that the information in the first part of the sentence (the part before the comma) explains the reason for the situation described in the second part. The first part states that what King Philip wanted (domination for Spain) "ran counter to" what Queen Elizabeth wanted (independence for England). Choice (D) logically completes the sentence: Given that there was such a fundamental disagreement between the two monarchs, "conflict" would likely be "inevitable," or unavoidable. raconteur- excels at telling stories.
Instructions:
Now that you have a wealth of methods for testing the validity of categorical syllogisms, here are a few exercises to apply your new knowledge. For the following syllogisms determine if the argument is valid or invalid and show/explain how you arrived at your conclusion. Good Luck!

1. All pollution-free devices are completely efficient machines.

No automobiles are completely efficient machines.

No automobiles are pollution-free devices.

Valid / Invalid Reasoning:

2. No logic teachers are benevolent persons.
Some dictators are benevolent persons.
Some dictators are not logic teachers.

Valid / Invalid Reasoning:

3. All persons who worry are people who live in the future.
All persons who plan ahead are people who live in the future.
------------------------------------------------------------------
All persons who plan ahead are persons who worry.

Valid / Invalid Reasoning:

4. Some procrastinators are lazy persons.
No self-actualized persons are

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Mary’s ascension to the throne of England was marked with extraordinary political and religious circumstance: the return of Catholicism in England marshalled by Mary was a decision met with gratefulness and one that pleased many of those citizens supressed under the Tudor dynasty’s progressive and eventually full protestant stance. However, Mary’s gender meant that she couldn’t enjoy the same levels of independence and power as those wielded by her brother and father. Mary’s announcement that she intended to marry Philip II of Spain in 1554 divided her privy council into two distinct groups; one opposing her marriage, favouring the possible courter, Edward Courtenay (Earl of Devon), and the other, who supported the Spanish Monarch. The reasons for these split alliances were deeply ingrained in foreign policy, with those supporting Philip’s prospects seeking the advantages of a strong Anglo-Spanish alliance, and those against it fearing the consequences of a future hereditary Spanish claim to the English throne and a possible need to aid Spain in future conflict.…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    ii) James tried to ally England with Spain, but he failed and the two countries went to war.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In order to find out if the Roman Catholics were in fact a serious threat to Elizabeth and her church the essay must be split down into two main sub-sections, one to discover whether Catholics were a threat to Elizabeth herself and the other to decide whether they were a prominent threat to Elizabeth’s Church, however there is a very fine difference between the two as the majority of the rule of Elizabeth and her threats such as that from Spain were dominated by religion.…

    • 2682 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why did Phillip launch the Armada?- Phillip launched the Armada for many reasons. When Elizabeth became queen, Phillip asked her hand in marriage, but she refused. This angered him, as he hoped to keep power over England, and also keep it catholic. This was also an embarrassment as Spain was one of he most powerful countries in Europe. England was also helping protestants in the Netherlands, (which Spain ruled) to revolt against the catholic Spanish. As well as helping the Portrageas gain their independence from Spain. Phillip also had the support of the Pope who encouraged him to invade England. Elizabeth had been excommunicated from the church so the pope thought she ought to be removed. During the 1560's English ships began to loot Spanish fleets returning from America with gold. Phillip blamed Elizabeth for backing such raids and taking her share of the profits. In 1587 Elizabeth executed Mary queen of Scots which also angered Phillip as he saw Mary as the rightful queen of England.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    6. The uniting of Spain lead to their desire to beat the Portuguese in the race to gain wealth from the Indies. The “stage was now set” because everyone wanted to tap into more riches.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    JFK ques/answers

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages

    4. The argument in paragraph 6 acts as a syllogism because the paragraph is divided into three basic ideas:…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the issue of illegitimacy threatened to remove Elizabeth from the throne, I believe finance was a bigger problem as it affected the entire population of England, no matter which religion they followed, unlike the illegitimacy problem, which primarily affected Catholics only. Gender was another large issue because of marriage and the threat of foreign royalty getting joint power over England and pulling England into their countries affairs and problems, which could lead to war. Similarly, the problem Elizabeth faced with Parliament not backing her was the prospect of a civil war breaking out. War seems to be a large factor which runs through most problems Elizabeth faced and it seems war was primarily a problem because of England’s failing finances. All these points ultimately make finance the major problem which Elizabeth faced on her succession in…

    • 1755 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jlk; M

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Crown Lands Act- The Crown Lands Acts 1861 (NSW) were introduced by the New South Wales Premier, John Robertson, in 1861 to reform land holdings and in particular to break the squatters' domination of land tenure. Under his reforms unsurveyed land in an area which had been declared an agricultural reserve in designated unsettled areas could be selected and bought freehold in 40-to-320-acre (16–130 ha) lots of Crown land, wherever situated at £1 per acre (£2 9s 5d/ha), on a deposit of five shillings per acre (12s 4d/ha), the balance to be paid within three years, an interest-free loan of three-quarters of the price.…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Srtwylfui

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In 1588 Phillip 11 sent an armada to other throw Elizabeth and replaces her with a catholic monarch. In this essay i am going to explain why the armada failed by looking at the difference between the Spanish and English and how these affected the outcome of the conflict.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jhnlk

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In what ways did religion and economic influence the development of medieval Europe and Japan?…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    All substantial threats to Elizabeth’s position as Queen were symptoms of the tension between Catholicism and Protestantism. The threats posed by Mary Queen of Scots, as well as those of the Spanish Armada of 1588 and the war with Spain (which dominated the last twenty years of Elizabeth’s reign), were consequences of a Catholic desire to gain supremacy in England. However, the extent to which the Catholic threat was centred on Mary Queen of Scots is debateable. Whilst she was undoubtedly a figurehead for Catholic opposition to Elizabeth’s rule and was the monarchical figure around whom several treasonous plots were designed, there is much evidence for the view that Mary became a focal point for a Catholic threat that would have existed even if she had been absent. The extent to which the structure given to the Catholic cause by Mary’s presence strengthened the Catholic threat is also debateable. There were others who could have become the rallying point for Catholic opposition (as Philip II of Spain did after Mary’s death), although none had as good a claim to the throne as Mary. A great threat was presented by Catholic opposition to Elizabeth’s rule, but Mary’s influence over this, and therefore the threat that she posed as an individual, may be called into question.…

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Elizabeth I was intelligent, and would work to keep her reign. In Elizabeth’s speech to the troops before the battle of the Armada she states “…Spain, or any prince of Europe should dare to invade the borders of my realm... I myself will take up arms…” Elizabeth clearly says that she would fight for her country. Being intelligent, she exercised frugality in the expenses of the government and increasing taxation, which showed a sign of a strong and efficient state. She wanted to achieve religious harmony. On the other hand, the Stuarts were stubborn. They refused to extend religious toleration. Like his father, Charles I believed in the Divine Right of Kings (that he was answerable to God alone and could not be tried by any court), and he upset the Scottish citizens of his country, many of whom were Puritans, by insisting that they follow the same religion as his English subjects. The result was the two wars that ruined England’s financial state and that would lead to the civil war and his…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Mary decided upon making Spain a close ally in 1554 through the marriage of herself and Philip II of Spain, she took special precaution to not give the superpower too much authority over England. Despite that Lord Chancellor Gardiner and the House of Commons petitioned Mary to consider marrying an Englishman, after they feared that England would be relegated to a dependency of Spain, this fear in many cases came true. Philip viewed the marriage as entirely political and his second visit to England was clearly only due to wanting involvement in England, Spanish interests in England were helpfully reinforced through the marriage and Mary’s foreign policy, subsequently making England a Spanish pawn. However arguments to indicate that England was not dominated by Spain are also clearly noticeable, as Mary received her own advantages out of the marriage with Philip and assured Spain of the little authority Philip would receive through the terms of agreement.…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There were tensions between Philip II and Elizabeth I of England. After the death of Mary I of England, relations between these two empires started to decline with the reign of Elizabeth I. Religion was a major cause to the tensions between these two nations. Philip II promoted Catholicism and so did Mary I who used harsh tactics in trying to make England a Catholic country. When Elizabeth I took power she ignored what Mary I had done and promoted the Anglican Church and Protestantism. Elizabeth I made it mandatory to engage with the Anglican Church and further ruined relations with Spain.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Elizabeth

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages

    During the Tudor dynasty Parliament was an important institution, but its sessions were occasional not continual. It sat for about three of Elizabeth's forty-five years. In many years, Parliament did not meet, and it usually sat for only about three months when it did meet. This highlights how in the time of the Tudors, especially in the reigns of Henry VIII and Elizabeth, the power of parliament had been much lessened.’ So wrote H. E. Marshall in Our Island Story. However the relationship between Elizabeth and her Parliament left historians divided on the matter. The term conflict indicates that within Elizabeth’s Parliament there was a state of opposition between her ideas and theirs causing huge disagreements. But others believe that Elizabeth was a tactical politician and even though her Parliament may have caused opposition it did not result in a full blown conflict as some would believe. On the other hand Elizabeth and her Parliament enjoyed clear co-operation with one another as they were clear that Elizabeth as the ruling Monarch was who they had to please. Thus instead Elizabeth’s Parliament had the act of working together to the same end at which the wealth fare of England’s people was their main goal. The opinions of Sloan and Randell are among many historians that have a clear opinion on the relationship between Elizabeth and Parliament. On the one hand Sloan can ‘imagine how the assertiveness posed problems for a monarch’, highlighting how he noticed the problems that Elizabeth faced but not necessarily to the extent of conflict. In contrast Randell highlights the importance of keeping the governor and the governed on a peaceful path to emphasise Elizabeth trying to keep her and Parliament on mutual terms.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics