Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

John Locke - Seperation of Powers

Good Essays
746 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
John Locke - Seperation of Powers
"Separation of Powers" Separation of powers is the act of separating of responsibilities of the three branches of the government. The idea of this separation is not a new one either. John Locke originally talked about it. He stated that the legislative power should be divided between the King and Parliament in England. Another man also spoke about this separation, the French writer Montesquieu, who wrote about it in 1748 in his book De l'esprit des lois. His point was that liberty is most effective if it is safeguarded by the separation of powers. He highly promoted liberty. As in the Encyclopedia Britannica, it stated that Montesquieu felt that liberty is most highly promoted when there are three branches of government acting independently of each other. Although his model for the three-branch government was for England, it became more important to the United States. His work was most notably shown in America when the Constitution was being created. Finally, Alexander Hamilton raised his point on separation of powers in the series of essays called The Federalist. The Encyclopedia Encarta said that he wrote this with James Madison and John Jay and that there were 85 essays all together. They were written about how they wanted the new government to run. It was their view as to how each major department in the new central government should run. More specifically, they stated how the three branches of government should run and expounded the idea of judicial review. The way that the power is separated in the United States was that the legislative branch makes the laws, the executive branch executes the laws and the judicial branch interprets the laws. However, as our book and the Encyclopedia Britannica both state, the executive branch in the United States has gained a lot more power. They both claim this because of numerous changes in social and economic life. The idea of checks and balances is closely related to the idea of separation of powers. Checks and balances is the idea that each branch of the government has ways to make sure that each other branch does not gain too much power. Instead, each branch is encouraged to share power with the other. Again, our book and the Encyclopedia Britannica both say that the way that this works is that the courts have judicial review, which is the power of the courts to examine both the executive and legislative branches to make sure that they are doing, is constitutional. Congress has the power to impeach people from both the judicial and executive branches. Plus they have the power to appropriate funds. Finally, the executive branch has the power to veto bills passed by Congress. However, this can be overridden by a 2/3-majority vote in Congress. However, a new concept helps the President, he can line item veto, which means he can blank out certain parts of the bill so it does not have to totally written. The idea of separation of powers is what separates us from Great Britain in the way we run our democracy. In England, the legislative executive branches are integrated. This idea is reinforced with the idea that they should be in constant agreement. It is pretty obvious that they are not in constant agreement here. This can happen because Congress may have a republican majority yet the president and his cabinet may be democratic. The idea is separation of powers is even related to Federalism as a whole. According to the Grolier Encyclopedia, federalism is directly related to the separation of powers. However, it is related to the separation between the state and national government. It said that each level of government is autonomous from the other. Also, neither is dependent on the other for legislation, taxes or administration. The idea of separation of powers has been around for a long time. Our newly founded government decided to use it as a base when writing the Constitution. Its main ideas are related to other aspects of our government such as checks and balances. Its ideals have changed a little bit because now the executive branch has a bit more power, but for the most part it has stayed intact. This concept also relates to the separation between the states and the national government. Each state government is separate from the national government. From the original ideas of Hamilton, Locke, and Montesquieu has come the type of government we have today.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Checks And Balances

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Theory of Checks and Balances. The concept of constitutional checks arose as an outgrowth of the classical theory of separation of powers, by which the legislative, executive, and judicial powers of government were held properly to be vested in three different units. The purpose of this, and of the later development of checks and balances, was to ensure that governmental power would not be used in an abusive manner. However, in its original form the concept involved social classes rather than…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution of the United States defines a government with three branches: executive, legislative and judicial. Each branch has certain powers, but those powers are also bound by specific limits, exercised primarily in a system of checks and balances by the other branches. This concept is known as "separation of powers," according to an overview on the website of the National Conference of State Legislatures, a term coined by Charles-Louis de Secondat, an 18th-century French social and political philosopher. The legislative branch makes laws, but they must be signed by the executive to take effect, or they may be vetoed. The judicial branch rules on the laws' constitutionality. Legislators can respond by overriding a veto, changing a law or amending the Constitution.…

    • 877 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    James Madison wrote, “Liberty requires that the three great departments of power should be separate and distinct.” The three branches were called the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. All legislative powers were given to the Congress, which contained the Senate and House of Representatives. The executive powers were given to the President. The judicial decisions were made by judges within the Supreme Court (Doc B). The split of control allowed for each branch to be equal to the others. The three branches stopped the possibility of a tyranny of happening with a separation of powers. The definition of tyranny is that all the power is given to one person or group, which is the complete opposite of what was written in the…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This separation of powers ensures that no branch becomes powerful enough to overtake the other two. The legislative branch, otherwise known as Congress, makes the laws, the executive branch, AKA the president and vice-president, enforces the laws, and the judicial branch, the courts (including but not limited to the Supreme Court, interprets the law. Each branch functions independently from the others, each having its own powers and area of influence. No branch can accomplish anything of major importance without the cooperation of at least one of the…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Separation Of Powers Dbq

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The theory of the Separation of Powers keeps the government in check and ensures that one branch doesn’t become too powerful or else the government would be a monarchy or dictatorship. In document one, it talks about how there are three branches of government: the Legislative Branch, the Executive Branch, and the Judicial Branch. The powers of the government are separated between these three branches, sort of like the system of checks and balances, because they didn’t want one branch becoming too powerful and taking over the other branches. In document five it shows how each branch has one main power or job. For example the main power of the Legislative Branch is to make the laws. The Executive Branch has the President and the branch is responsible for carrying out and enforcing the laws. The Judicial Branch has the courts and their main power is to interpret the laws and punish those who have broken the law. The Separation of Powers limit the power of the federal government by making sure one branch does not become too…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Separation of powers is a feature of the Constitution that requires each of the three branches of government to be relatively independent of the others so that one cannot control the others. The constitution does not divide power absolutely but instead, it shares it among the government. James Madison, as well as the Founders, also came up with a federal system of government which divided the power between a national government and the individual states. They sought the federal system as an additional check on the national…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Guard Against Tyranny

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Legislative, executive, and judicial are the three branches. The legislative branch, which consists of a senate and house of representatives, makes laws. The president and vice-president make up the executive branch, which is the branch mainly responsible for enforcing laws. Finally, there is the judicial branch. In the judicial branch, there is the Supreme Court and many smaller courts. The judicial branch is responsible for interpretting laws; this is all according to Document B, also written by James Madison. In a nutshell, seperation of powers guards against tyranny because it divides the powers into three branches so no branch can overpower…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Legislative branch in United States has one of the three division of government that works in conjunction with executive and judicial branches. Then, United States constitution outline the power of the legislative branch including a congress which is divided by two houses namely the Senate and House of Representative. In order for democratic government and to function properly, it is important to have a separation of power. This means that the power distribution separation between branches and the…

    • 79 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most amazing thing about philosophy has and always will be that no one specific philosophy can be considered correct or perfect, we as human beings deem philosophies correct because of our life experiences and our individual way of thinking. Over time we acquire new knowledge and philosophies for which we base our way of living on. For example, Robert Filmer upholds his belief of the monarchy’s divine right to rule over men in his book Patriarcha but in the last few chapters of his book Locke responds to Filmer by saying that one man should not hold such power. Locke argues that separation of power with different branches of government should be implemented and that ultimately the people have the supreme power over the state, and they have the right to overthrow unjust rulers. Of course, Americans are very familiar with this philosophy since the founding fathers of the United Sates used it as the basis of the Declaration of Independence. In section 50 near the end of Chapter V: Of Property Locke writes a key passage where he concludes that men have voluntarily accepted an…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tyranny Dbq

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Separation of powers is defined as a system of government in which powers are divided/shared between federal and state governments. Some evidence that described more about the separation of powers came from document B, titled Separation of Powers, was basically about having all power in the same hands, which James Madison defined as tyranny, plus liberty required all powers in the government to be separate. One of the arguments involving the separation of powers was that each branch of government had a different job, which divided the powers.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another way the Constitution protects us from tyranny is through the separation of powers. The legislative, executive, and judiciary branch are separate and distinct branches of government. (Document B) Each branch has powers and members. The legislative branch has powers vested in the Congress, which consists of the Senate and the House of Representatives. The legislative branch creates our laws. The executive branch’s powers are given to the President. It is his job to enforce laws. The judicial branch’s powers belong to the Supreme Court, which can declare laws unconstitutional.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    All branches are able with certain precautions to prevent against concentration and misuse of power. The idea of checks and balances has been generally effected in a variety of constitutional governments, including the United States, where powers are distributed between three branches: the legislative, executive, and judicial.…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Separation of Powers-the states are divided into branches each with separate and indepent powers and areas of responsibility so that no branch has more power than the other branches.…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Montesquieu argument for the separation of powers, “he did not mean that these departments ought to have no partial agency in, or no control over, the acts of each other” (270). In Federalist paper #48, describes how the Federal Constitution provides a defense through a blend of the branches of government. In class, we discuss that in order to make the separation of powers work there is a need to find a way that the legislative branch does not take power from the executive. He provides examples of Virginia and Pennsylvania in which the powers of the legislative were not protected against and the executive branch was usurped by the legislative. In class, we also discuss that there were three important things that prevent legislature to intimidate and control the behavior of the executive which means Congress controls over the President. First, elections which nor the president or the congress can control them, there are elected independently. Second, Salaries which means that there are fixed and cannot be altered, and finally the division of powers and the presidential veto, which it creates two different chambers the house and the…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At one point it was expected, that the Congress would pass laws, the President would execute them, and the Supreme Court would interpret them in individual cases. This was the framework for the Separation of Powers; established by the Constitution, and stuck to it for the greater part of our history. The Founding Fathers were well-acquainted with a long-held tenet of government: the accumulation of power by a single person or body of government is the greatest threat to liberty. In fact, a celebrated feature of the…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics