John Muir Vs Peter Singer Essay

Throughout the course of writing my essay I began to realize that these two authors are passionate for their work. John Muir having a passionate sense of relief with nature. These two authors are both researchers of their philosophies of life. Peter Singers desires his energy towards a sense of relief such as John. These two researchers have made a differences in the world for happiness and peace in a way nature should be treated. Whereas Peter Singers talks about in his essay The Singer Solution to World Poverty convincing the audience with two different situations trying to persuaded the reader to donate their money to charities instead of buying unnecessary items. As to John Muir he reflects more about nature.
Although, almost a generation apart in age, both philosopher share a common connection with nature. They each have been recognized by their amazing talent of nature writing. Peter Singer was a professor for Centre for human bioethics while John Muir was known for being the founder of Sierra Club. Muir activism helped to preserve many wilderness areas.
They both believe that nature was built for all human kind and species. Not just for some of us. They want peace and happiness and that is why they both want society to realize how much harm we are doing to our planet Earth. The have both made a difference in the world, they created a way to influence the readers how we live in our everyday lives. For example, in Singer essay, what should a billionaire give- and what should you? Singer states, “in our world today-some lives are worth saving and others are not.” As a result, if child with rich parents is dying they rather save his life, meanwhile a child with poor parents is suffering not knowing how to say goodbye. Why? Because that how society was taught to do. Singer is pointing out what the real world is doing. However, Muir fought to save our parks because many of our authority wanted to destroy