Preview

John Ruskin What We Think Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
845 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
John Ruskin What We Think Analysis
It is sometimes said that thoughts develop into actions. I disagree with this statement. A person must always have thoughts and ideas before doing anything, however, without deciding to act upon the thoughts they remain merely, thoughts. John Ruskin sums it up well in this quote: “What we think, or what we know, or what we believe is, in the end, of little consequence. The only consequence is what we do.” What Ruskin means by this is people can think or believe whatever they want and it won’t amount to anything unless they make the decision to act upon it. And if they do not act upon their thoughts then they are irrelevant and amount to nothing. I strongly agree with Ruskin in this idea. This is because I have seen way too many people conjure up incredible ideas and plans, but never act upon them, causing the amazing idea to go waste. On the contrary, I have seen rash, extreme beliefs actually acted upon and the horrific aftermath that was left in the wake. …show more content…
He would be insulted and disrespected by the natives. Orwell noted, “I was hated by large numbers of people”(Orwell). This was simply because he was a European and was looked upon as the oppressor, when in actuality, Orwell was against everything he was doing and was entirely on the side of the Burmese. Orwell stated that “imperialism was an evil thing” and “I was all for the Burmese and all against their oppressors, the British”(Orwell). This is a perfect example of what Ruskin was talking about when he said, “The only consequence is what we do”(Ruskin). Orwell had all of these different thoughts and ideas about how he was with the Burmese in their fight and was completely against the British, but he never acted upon any of them. This lack of action resulted in him having to stray from his personal values and slaughter an elephant, “solely to avoid looking a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thinking is needed in order for improvement and advancement. Without it we would still be stuck as cavemen or probably extinct. In the story Thinkers Anonymous: Do You Think Too Much? the protagonist is having serious difficulty with thinking too much. Thinking too much is not always detrimental, there are benefits to it. For example it leads me to do great analysis’ on texts, which leads to believe that is probably why the protagonist ran to the library. The concept of people saying to not think so much reminds me of the book The Giver by Lois Lowry, because both have societies where thinking a lot is frowned upon. Which brings to mind the issue of people being subconsciously controlled to not think so they just do as they are told. It baffles…

    • 149 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Orwell succeeds greatly in telling one of his remarkable experiences in Burma. While working for the British Empire as a police officer in Burma, he comes across a elephant gone mad that in his judgment he shouldn’t shoot because the handler was on his way and there was no need to kill the expensive piece of property anymore. But in the end he felt that he needed to do a service for the mob of people that had congregated. Orwell wrote this essay 10 or so years after the events that took place in the essay. The British Empire at the time of writing was going through major changes and its imperial power was declining. So he was telling his incredible story as a way of informing the British citizens at the time of exposing the injustices and dark side of imperialism that he felt he had to right. The whole world when he was writing this essay was enduring a economic depression and were facing another possible world war. So it was a dark time not only for the British empire but the whole world.…

    • 796 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This story begins in Moulmain, in lower Burma. The author speaks about his experiences while he was working as a police officer. In this time, Orwell was a young inexperienced soldier. He was in that place to protect the Queen’s interests. He had to do unethical things that made conflicts himself. When he mentions that he killed an elephant I feel his pangs of conscience. The elephant destroyed a village before it died. The villagers were furious about all the mess and Orwell was called to restore the order before anything, or anyone, was hurt. While this adventure runs, he decided to kill the animal because he thought that was the best. He needed to show solidarity among the villagers as a man of authority.…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jeremy Rikin Essay

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In this article, “A Change of Heart about Animals,” Jeremy Rifkin argues that animals are the same as humans because they have emotions, cognitive abilities and are self-aware. Rifkin supports his argument by using the rhetorical tools of comparing and pathos. His purpose is to encourage people to take action in order to treat animals more humanely. His audience is people who read the LA Times and his tone is compassionate.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1936, author George Orwell wrote an essay titled “Shooting an Elephant”. In the essay Orwell describes a scene of a British police officer who is stuck between having to shoot an elephant. The story takes place in Burma, India where then, they were under British imperialism. Imperialism is a policy of extending a country's power and influence through diplomacy or military force. It humiliates the occupied people, reducing them to an inferior status in their own country. Analyzing Orwell’s work, I realize that Orwell feels Imperialism is not good for both the people subject to and the people of the imperial power. The fact that the main character of the story is an officer of the imperial government, but also in opposition to imperialism…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Burmese population’s expectation of him to follow through, fear of acceptance, the repercussions of going against his own feelings and will. In the end he states “that [he] was very glad that the coolie had been killed because it put [him] legally in the right and gave him a sufficient pretext for shooting the elephant” (4). He also states “... i had done it solely to avoid looking a fool” (4). Orwell was a product of where he came from. He acted upon his feeling, on what he felt compelled to do with no remorse…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He felt comfort in knowing that because a man had died due to the elephant's rage, that he was legally in the right. However, he stated did not stand for imperialism, and that it was “evil”, yet he displayed the very thing he despised. The Burmese people were treated terribly by the Empire. Orwell even says, “The wretched prisoners huddling in the stinking cages of the lock-ups, the grey, cowed faces of long-term convicts, the scarred buttocks of the men who had been flogged with bamboos—all these oppressed me with an intolerable sense of guilt.” By that, it reflects exactly what the elephants living conditions were. And with all of the rage pent up from being confined and living in deplorable conditions, once the elephant was freed, it had every reason to go rogue. Just like the elephant, the people of Lower Burman had a reason to be rebellious and filled with hate. Orwell was in a position to simply wait for the elephant's to mahout come back, as it harmlessly fed itself in the distance. Instead, he gave in to the pressure, let his ego take over, and took the life of an…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shooting an Elephant

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages

    the double standard and as race played part in the bureaucratic town of Burma. The author unfolds the story that should he not kill the elephant, that had gone mad and killed a coolie, he must forfeit his authority with the local Burmese. As Orwell stated "only time in his life" he was hated, by large number of people because of his position" ...(P. 173)…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yup This is IT

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages

    George Orwell was “disgusted by the inhumanity of colonial rule that he witnessed while stationed in Burma” (2835 Orwell). Using his writing to confess the inner conflict of an imperial police officer, he wrote an autobiographical essay titled Shooting an Elephant. He notes that the Burmese civilians were not allowed to own guns during his stay – a testament of British control over Burmese resources. Feeling “stuck between his hatred of the empire he served and his rage against the evil-spirited little beasts who tried to make his job impossible” he knew that “the sooner he chucked up the job and got out of it the better” (2844 Orwell). Orwell repressed his emotions because acting out as the only white man would have been foolish. If he betrayed his country, he risked treason. If he sided with the Burmese, he would never fit into their culture. Every white man’s life long struggle in the East was to not be laughed at, so the safest choice for a man like George was to live without action. However, when a sexually aggressive elephant gets loose Orwell is called to take action.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    George Orwell's "Shooting an Elephant" is an essay about a British police officer living in Lower Burma who goes through the trial and error process of making the right decisions while still trying to maintain an image and position of authority. The officer is hated by the Burmese people, which is clearly shown when he would play football. The Burmese were extremely unfair to the officer due to the fact he was part of the Imperialist group which was oppressing Burma. (para. 1) Although the officer is hated he feels "Imperialism, [is] an evil thing" and he "[is] all for the Burmese and against their oppressors, the British," his own kind. (para. 2)…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    George Orwell’s ‘Shooting an Elephant,’ is an essay which takes place in imperial Burma where he is a police officer working on behalf of the British Empire. He is resented by the people who pressures him into shooting an elephant, where he describes himself as being a meaningless puppet in front of the Burmese crowd. Throughout this essay he also delivers his strong personal beliefs towards his hatred of imperialism, despite working for the colonies, he mentions several times of how much he despises it and sees it as ‘evil.’…

    • 865 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shooting an Elephant

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Orwell did not get along with the Burmese, nor did he like them because they would make fun of him and enjoyed insulting him while on duty. As for the British Raj, he felt as if the Raj was a cruel and aggressive government ruler and that his hatred towards him was so great that he would “drive a bayonet into a Buddhist priest’s guts.” (pg.3). Therefore Orwell being a white man has a great conflict with the Burmese.…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main idea of the story “Shooting an Elephant" by Orwell is the effect of the oppressor is not only on the oppressed, but himself. There are several evidences found in the text to support the main idea. First, the author mentioned about the treatment of a European woman gets when she went to bazaars alone. This explained the freedom of security had been taken away. Since European had colonized Burma at that time, there was growing hatred toward European. Freedom to act also been seize when the narrator was expected to shoot an elephant even it’s not in his wiliness. In the story, Orwell had an inner struggle whether to kill the elephant or not. He taught that if the elephant were kept alive, it worth at least a hundred pound. However, if it were shot dead, its tusks only going to worth about five pounds. Moreover, he anthropomorphized the elephant by referring ‘it’ to ‘he’. He said, “It seems to be that it would be murder to shoot him.”(519) Plus, a life had been killed needs to be considered and there would be possibilities that the elephant will escape again, causing damage to the village. These reasons made Orwell to question his decision. Another crucial reasoning that drones the narrator to open fire is his identity as an Imperialist that control fellow Burmese. If he did not kill the elephant as the villagers expected, he would be viewed as a coward. This will further affect efforts to enforce law and coded in Burma. The narrator also described, ‘I perceived in this moment that when the white man turns tyrant it is his own freedom that he destroy,” to show an imperialist had to control or act as what had been expected. These conclude an oppressor would be affected when taking control of others.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This, I believe...

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The primary factor influencing Orwell’s decision was the attitude of the local Burmese police. Orwell wanted to appear to be a trustworthy and courageous man since he was the alien in the culture. He did not want to be patronized; he kept going against his will, doing what he did not want.…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    John Ruskin Work

    • 10132 Words
    • 41 Pages

    MY FRIENDS, — I have not come among you to-night to endeavour to give you an entertaining lecture; but to tell you a few plain facts, and ask you some plain, but necessary, questions. I have seen and known too much of the struggle for life among our labouring population, to feel at ease, even under any circumstances, in inviting them to dwell on the trivialities of my own studies; but, much more, as I meet to-night, for the first time, the members of a working Institute established in the district in which I have passed the greater part of my life, I am desirous that we should at once understand each other, on graver matters. I would fain tell you, with what feelings, and with what hope, I regard this Institution, as one of many such, now happily established throughout England, as well as in other countries; — Institutions which are preparing the way for a great change in all the circumstances of industrial life; but of which the success must wholly depend upon our clearly understanding the circumstances and necessary limits of this change. No teacher can truly promote the cause of education, until he knows the conditions of the life for which that education is to prepare his pupil. And the fact that he is called upon to address you, nominally, as a "Working Class," must compel him, if he is in any wise earnest or thoughtful, to enquire in the outset, on what you yourselves suppose this class distinction has been founded in the past, and must be founded in the future. The manner of the amusement, and the matter of the teaching, which any of us can offer you, must depend wholly on our first understanding from you, whether you think the distinction heretofore drawn between working men and others, is truly or falsely founded. Do you accept it as it stands ? do YOU wish it to be modified? or do you think the object of education is to efface it, and make us forget it for ever ?…

    • 10132 Words
    • 41 Pages
    Better Essays