It argues that instead of being focused on the person like Searle is, it should focus on the system of the entire experiment. John Searle replies that even the system also does not understand Chinese, it knows the symbols and can apply their usage according to the instructions, but it does not understand Chinese. There is nothing different between the system and John Searle in this case, they are the same thing. Even if it is a robot who does all of the processes as opposed to Searle, there is no difference as it is still just monotonously doing what the book tells it to do to carry on a conversation.
The Chinese Room argument shows that computers do not have intentionality, as well as many other non-human thinking things. It argues for functionalism saying that if something has the ability to fully use our minds, it has intentionality, if it is only able to mimic our minds, it does not have