Steinbeck uses the differences between town and village as a metaphor for the differences between the colonists and the Native Americans. Steinbeck shows how he uses the stark differences between the huts of the Native Americans and the grand villas of the colonists in the following quote:"They came to the place where the brush houses stopped and the city of stone and plaster began, the city of harsh outer walls and inner cool gardens where a little water played and the bougainvillea crusted where walls with purple and brick-red and white." (Steinbeck, pg. 8)In this quote, Steinbeck emphasizes the stark difference between the village, made of simple materials, and the town, made of expensive materials. Steinbeck also uses the town's buildings as a metaphor for the people within, as Steinbeck describes the buildings as having "harsh outer walls," but having "inner cool gardens." This could be a metaphor for the people within the building, portraying the people inside them as, at once, very kind and nice, but only once those walls had been let down. This shows the colonists as being very xenophobic, and being kind to their own race but "harsh" to other races.
Steinbeck reinforces the idea that the colonists were living better than the Native Americans in the following quote:"The procession left the brush houses and entered the stone and plaster city where the streets were a little wider and there was a narrow pavement beside the buildings." (Steinbeck, pg. 47)Steinbeck shows that the Native Americans saw the colonists' living conditions as better than theirs, and that the streets were "a little wider," which could be seen as a commentary for most things, and that in most things, what the colonists lived "a little" better. Steinbeck here tells us, and when combined with the quote above, the colonists are living better than the Native Americans. Because the colonists have plenty of resources, and the Native Americans are not living in the luxury of the colonists, it indicates an unfair share of wealth, which is oddly skewed in the favor of the colonists. This reinforces the already presented idea that the colonists are, overall, living better than the Native Americans.
Steinbeck's next way to differentiate between the colonists and the Native Americans is using their instinctual actions. Steinbeck shows that the colonists and Native Americans are instinctively different, thus he attempts to give an excuse, or perhaps a reason, for the differences between them, and their outcomes. Steinbeck explores into the instinctual differences between the Native Americans and the colonists in the following quotes:"There was sorrow in Kino's rage, but this last thing had tightened him beyond breaking. He was an animal now, for hiding, for attacking, and he lived only to protect himself and his family… [despite his need for a canoe,]…never once did it occur to him to take one of the canoes of his neighbor." (Steinbeck, pg. 42)"He could kill the doctor more easily than he could talk to him, for all of the doctor's race spoke to all of Kino's race as though they were simple animals." (Steinbeck, pg. 9)Once again, we can see the recurring theme that the Native Americans have become whatever the colonists mold them to be, and as seen in the second quote, Steinbeck says that "the doctor's race spoke to all of Kino's race as though they were simple animals…," and Steinbeck says in the first quote that Kino "was an animal now…." This shows that Kino, and his people as a whole, have become what the colonists have made them, and that they have become whatever the colonists wished them to be. This shows that the colonists control every facet of Native American life, and that anything that they want to be done will be done.
Steinbeck shows that the colonists have been raised with the instinctive belief that they were above the Native Americans, and that they were better than the Native Americans:"Have I got nothing better to do than cure insect bites for 'little Indians'? I am a doctor, not a veterinary." (Steinbeck, pg. 11)This shows that the doctor thought that the Indians were "animals," and because of the fact that the colonists have been molding the Indians beliefs, the Indians thought that they were animals, perhaps resulting in the instinctive animal behavior. Steinbeck says in the previous quote that the colonists treated "Kino's race" like that, so perhaps it has become an instinctual reaction to the oppression of the colonists.
Steinbeck says that Kino was an animal who "lived only to protect himself and his family," showing that he did it as an instinctive defense, and that he only becomes an animal to protect his family. Steinbeck also emphasizes that Kino becomes his animal alias only when he needs to hide or protect himself. This shows that Kino's people have developed this as a natural defense, and its use is only for defense. This also shows that his people developed it for need of defense, and that continual need of protection is the only reason such a protection would be needed, and there is only one source for this continuous onslaught, and that is the colonists.
Steinbeck also goes so far as to say that the instinctive animal that Kino becomes retains all of the qualities that Kino retains, even so far as his lack of will to steal from his own kind. This shows that Kino's alias does not seek survival of Kino as a person, but Kino's race as a whole. He is unwilling to take from his people, as his alias is unwilling to damage itself. If his alias is for the protection of a whole group of people, then they must be under attack from a large group of people, giving us the structure of the assumption that the colonist society persecutes the Native Americans and the Native Americans have developed instincts for their protection.
"…the strangers came with argument and authority and gunpowder to back up both. And in the four hundred years [since,] Kino's people had learned only one defense- a slight slitting of the eyes and a slight tightening of the lips and a retirement. Nothing could break down this wall, and they could remain whole within the wall." (Steinbeck, pg. 17)In this quote Steinbeck shows another instinct, reclusion behind an inner shell, the creation of which has been directly linked to the coming of colonist society. However, this reaction shows more of the actual standpoint of the Native American society, as reactive, and unable to be proactive. This reactivity means that the situation will remain the same, and if this was the way that Kino's ancestors were and will be, then this situation will remain the same until stopped by outside intervention.
This also shows that the Native American society has chosen to preserve itself within their shell, and to submit outside of it. Whenever attacked outside of the shell, they shelter inside their shell of refusal to change, as shown in the above quote. This results in the situation remaining a perfect clone of the situation that it was when it started, resulting in continuing colonist oppression. If the only place that they can take refuge is within personal shell, then they cannot control anything outside their shell, and they are therefore powerless outside their shell.
The colonist society, as a whole, exerts their control over the Native American population using the yoke of education.
"This is our one chance… [our son] must break out of the pot that holds us in." (Steinbeck, pg. 103)Steinbeck here shows what that the Native Americans see lack of education as a "pot that holds us in." This also shows that they do not get any chances to learn, for if they did, then they would have more than "one chance." As the only way they can learn is to be taught by an educated person, and the only educated people are the colonists, the colonists must be withholding education. This shows that the colonists might be intentionally trying to keep the Native Americans in their "pot." It is also interesting that this "pot" is probably the same as the "shell" that the Native Americans hide in.
"He did not know, and perhaps this doctor did. And he could not take the chance of pitting his certain ignorance against this man's possible knowledge. He was trapped as his people were always trapped, and would be until… they could be sure that the things in the books were really in the books." (Steinbeck, pg. 76)This shows an example of how the colonists use education to control the Native American population. "He was trapped as his people were always trapped, and would be until…they could be sure that the things in the books were really in the books." This specific sub-phrase shows how his people trusted the books as reliable sources, information that the colonists must have planted.
If the colonists planted the knowledge that the books were reliable, being the only people who could read the books, anything and everything that they said about the books, if not a lie, was true. And as the Native Americans did not know when people were lying, anything that a colonist said could be definitely accurate, or a lie. The risk seemed too much and the Native Americans usually did as they said, as Kino does, because they are afraid of matching their "certain ignorance against [the colonists'] possible knowledge."Steinbeck also continually shows that the colonists use their control of religion, through their knowledge of education, as another way of controlling the Native American populace.
"It was a good idea, but it was against religion…The loss of the pearl[s] was a punishment visited on those who tried to leave their station. And the father made it clear that each man and woman is…a soldier sent by god to guard some part…of the Universe….But each one must remain faithful to his post and must not go running about, else the castle is in danger from the assaults of Hell…." (Steinbeck, pg. 42)This shows that the colonists use their knowledge of religion, due to their reading ability, to keep the Native Americans thinking that they are doing God's will, or, if they believe otherwise, do so out of fear of being incorrect. The colonists tell the Native Americans that they have to stay in their current position in life, living as poor peasants who treat the colonists as royalty, because that that is God's will. Because the Native Americans are unsure of what is correct, they take what is, to them, the safer approach, by doing as the colonists say.
The colonists also bring in faith, by saying that if they are not faithful to their post, and thus not faithful to their religion, which would be considered blasphemy by the religious Native Americans, then they would be in danger of the attack from the "assaults of hell," which could be interpreted as going to hell, which the religious Native Americans would be very afraid of.
"…I heard him make that sermon…he makes it every year."This shows that the colonists try to keep the Native Americans in line, and that it is, again, a group effort and that the entire colonist community works as one in achieving their goal, the exploitation of the Native American society. This also shows that they do this repeatedly, and probably have for been using the same methods for centuries. This also shows that this oppression is not a one-time thing, and that it is a continuous, calculated, malicious oppression of a race.
Steinbeck has shown throughout The Pearl his opinions on the differences between the colonists and the Native Americans by showing their relationship, as the type of relationship is based upon the differences of its members. Steinbeck shows this through the differences between town and village, instinct, and education. Steinbeck portrays the colonists as aggressive, abusive, and manipulative throughout the book, especially towards the Native Americans. The Native Americans are portrayed as obedient, acknowledgeable, and living as underlings for the colonist society.
The Pearl by John Steinbeck. The Viking Press & William Heinemann, 1947. ISBN: 0-14-017737-X
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Chapter 3 starts by describing the colonists steep learning curve upon arriving to America. They had to learn the new seasonal patterns and new ways to survive. The Indians on the other hand had a clear understanding of the land. They were mobile, and decided on where to live based on the agricultural benefits of different areas based on the seasons. The colonists on the other hand, believed in required permanent settlements.…
- 900 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The main characters are brave and determined. Lewis is determined and refuses to give up. Clark is brave and is extremely optimistic. The Indians are wary, but most turn out to be friendly. Sacagawea is helpful.…
- 360 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The conflicts between White settlers and Native Americans is a huge theme throughout the book, the book actually opens with Elliott West illustrating a violent conflict between the Cheyenne Indians and White soldiers when two Cheyenne Indians hail a mail coach and non-intentionally spook the driver resulting in him shooting at the two men and fleeing. This resulted in the Cheyenne tribe that the two men were from to be attacked, and many of the members of that tribe to be killed or captured. I found this to be interesting because it seemed like a lot of the violence that each group perpetrated against each other was the result of fear, and this fear was a result of the misconceptions that both the White settlers and the Native Americans had towards each other. Although there were many other reasons that these conflicts happened, I feel that the main underlying issue was misunderstanding. Another aspect about the book that I found to be interesting and yielded a lot of information was on the discovery of gold and the effect that gold had on both groups. But something that I learned…
- 1065 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
When the Europeans first came to North America, they only inhabited the east coast. Naturally, wanting more land, they needed to explore the rest of the country. Two explorers named Lewis and Clark set out to do just that. However, what would Lewis have done without Clark, and how would Clark fair without Lewis? In Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck, characters provide each other the same purpose that Lewis and Clark did. In this way, the novel demonstrates that friendship gives life meaning.…
- 669 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
“The wilderness masters the colonists” is a very powerful quote from the article. The reason is because the english explorers were no match for the the nature in where the indians lived for centuries. Consequently causing all of the explorers to adapt to their new environment in order to survive.…
- 626 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
As I have mentioned the tone of the story was set from the beginning and stayed consistent throughout the story. After the dust storm was described Steinbeck told of a story of a tractor coming to tear down innocent people homes. The protagonist character argued and bargained for his family’s home. In response the tractor driver responded with sayings such as “Its not us. It’s the monster” or “the bank-the monster has to have profits at all time.” The arguments being made by the men tearing down homes spoke of a nation ran by money and the rich who could care less about the poor and their land if there was no use for them or their crops. Steinbeck showed the cruelty and power of American society with this introduction. As the book continued more glimpses were shown as he told of the thousands of people moving west with nothing and living in situations like “Hoovervilles”. The Joads had been in California no more than one day when they came upon one of these Hooverviles. After a dispute with a contractor and an officer the coldness was represented again when the…
- 565 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Published in 1937, John Steinbeck wrote a moving and powerful novel titled, Of Mice and Men. Steinbeck’s reliance on textual description makes the work accessible to young readers, as does his use of foreshadowing and reoccurring images. Equally important is the way Steinebeck intertwines loneliness, friendship, and sadness. A professor at the University of San Jose stated, “The near impossibility of attaining the American Dream in the face of the huge and random challenges, like natural and economic disasters became the central theme of Steinbeck’s novel” (“Of Mice and Men – Critical Reception” 1). Marxist and New Criticism were the two approaches applied to the novel Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck.…
- 248 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
The community of the ranch is cleverly portrayed by Steinbeck, and is used as a way of bringing together of a variety of characters in a way that is manageable and memorable for the reader. He portrays the general mindset of the migrant worker in different ways; how they act alone, in various circumstances, and most importantly together. The community of the ranch provides a physical and emotional setting for Steinbeck to explore and show us what he feels about the characters in his story.…
- 1193 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Whether by prayer, quest, or lottery ticket, humans have long expressed their dreams of a better life. Many are the tales about this phenomenon and, more often than not, the tales end in tragedy for the pleasure seeker.…
- 439 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
John Steinbeck grew up around Salinas, California. Even though he was not raised by parents who were poor, he witnessed discrimination upon the many dust bowl migrant workers who came from states that were “less fortunate” like Oklahoma and Texas. Steinbeck channeled his anger and frustration from observing the heartbreak and struggle during the Great Depression into crafting The Grapes of Wrath. According to Carroll Britch and Cliff Lewis in their article “Growth of the Family in The Grapes of Wrath,” “Although it addresses issues of great sociological change, The Grapes of Wrath is at its core about the family and struggle of its members to assert their separate identities without breaking up the family. (1)” He utilized his aggravation for the people to illustrate the drastic changes that occur in the characters over a period of time, such as the way in which the community is altered when financial hardship is imminent. But for Tom Joad…
- 1336 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
The dust bowl was a tragic time in America for so many families and John Steinbeck does a great job at getting up-close and personal with one family to show these tragedies. In the novel, “The Grapes of Wrath”, John Steinbeck employed a variety of rhetorical devices, such as asyndeton, personification and simile, in order to persuade his readers to enact positive change from the turmoil of the Great Depression. Throughout the novel, Steinbeck tells the fictional narrative of Tom Joad and his family, while exploring social issues and the hardships of families who had to endure the Dust Bowl and the Great Depression. Steinbeck’s purpose was to challenge readers to look at the harsh realities around them for “the purpose of improvement”. The rhetorical strategies used in the “Grapes of Wrath” elicit a deeper understanding from its readers for the hardships these migrants faced and helped them to fight for a better way. (John Steinbeck, "Banquet Speech," Nobel Foundation, http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/literature/laureates/1962/steinbeck-speech.html, Accessed 30 August 2013.)…
- 1767 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
Within the Pearl John Steinbeck uses quite a few techniques to show the cause and effect of such misfortune and imperfection. John Steinbeck evokes themes of the destructive power of greed, wealth, racism, and the loss of innocence and contentment within the Pearl by showing it through the dialogues and characterisations of individuals, for example the Doctor, by looking at the dialogues and characterisation of the Doctor, readers can easily figure out that he is…
- 678 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
One way Steinbeck produces creative commentary is through the use of different settings. The setting is where the story takes place, and in this story, the setting shifts several times as the family travels across the country to California. The story opens with an illustrious description of the setting. Through the description, “A day went by and the wind increased, steady, unbroken by the gusts. The dust from the roads fluffed up and spread out and fell on the weeds beside the fields, and fell into the fields a little way…” (Steinbeck 2), it reveals a horrible event. It sends the Joads and other tenant farmers into despair and into poverty. With their crops ruined, and their entire world covered in dust, farmers like the Joads cannot make do. From the start, the setting reveals the effects of the Great Depression on society. Droughts and lack of production crippled the farmers and economy. As the story progresses, the family moves to Uncle John’s house, which is very unfit for a large number of people. The quote, “…and the house, a square little box, unpainted and bare, and the barn,…
- 1273 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
At the end of “The Pearl” by John Steinbeck, Kino felt guilty and decides to throw the pearl back into the sea. The pearl symbolizes greed and suggests wealth could bring contentment while also teaching a lesson.Kino fantasized all the possibilities for his family when Juan Tomas asked him, “What will you do now that you have become a rich man?” (pg 24) KIno then stated, “We will get married at the church”, “Have new clothes”, “Have a rifle”, and “My son will go to school.” (pg 24-25) When Kino tried to sell the pearl to fulfill his dreams, the dealer stated, “This pearl is like fool’s gold..It is large and clumsy, As a curiosity it has interest; some museum might perhaps take it to place in collection of seashells. I can give you, say, a…
- 314 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Steinbeck consistently and woefully points to the fact that the migrants’ great suffering is caused not by bad weather or mere misfortune but by their fellow human beings. Historical, social, and economic circumstances separate people into rich and poor, landowner and tenant, and the people in the dominant roles struggle viciously to preserve their positions. In his brief history of California in Chapter 19, Steinbeck portrays the state as the product of land-hungry squatters who took the land from Mexicans and, by working it and making it produce, rendered it their own. Now, generations later, the California landowners see this historical example as a threat, since they believe that the influx of migrant farmers might cause history to repeat itself. In order to protect themselves from such danger, the landowners create a system in which the migrants are treated like animals, shuffled from one filthy roadside camp to the next, denied livable wages, and forced to turn against their brethren simply to survive. The novel draws a simple line through the population—one that divides the privileged from the poor—and identifies that division as the primary source of evil and suffering in the world.…
- 881 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays