Preview

John Stuart Mill Utilitarianism Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
922 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
John Stuart Mill Utilitarianism Analysis
I. Introduction

In the essay Utilitarianism written by John Stuart Mill, Mill presents the claim that happiness is the only thing that is good. Meaning that all happiness leads to pleasure through out our lives and can be noticed by the absence of pain. In this essay I will further explain Mill’s view on happiness and how it is connected to the Utilitarianism view. I will then define my own objection of Mill’s arguments and why it is a compelling objection to think about.
II. Mill’s Arguments
Through out “Utilitarianism” Mill, argues that happiness is the only basis of morality, and that mankind only desires happiness. His argument is supported by the declaration that all people need is either means to happiness or what is included in the meaning of happiness. Which is defined as “Good fortune, pleasure, contentment and joy” Mill believes that the only reason justice exists is because of utility and that our free will/rights only exist because it is necessary to human happiness. This
…show more content…
I also think that he would say that while, yes some people need to express more than just happiness, that happiness is the only emotion that will in the end bring them true pleasure. I would still have to disagree with Mill because most individuals have different forms of true happiness. While I think that Mill’s arguments are convincing I think that my objection is as well. It is important to remember that objections are merely opinions and while I’m sure as readers you have concerns about my objections as I do about Mill’s. The most important take away from my objection is that an individual should be strong enough to find happiness through every moment in their life. There is a reason that everything happens and if you believe that it will bring you happiness, even in the hardest times in your

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Mill separates pleasure into higher and lower as that he thinks some pleasure like higher is more for the soul and are long term and will benefit you as a person and the lower pleasures which are more material and offer short term pleasure but not the sort that lasts. He use the saying ‘Better to be a human dissatisfied than a pig satisfies; Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied‘ to show the differences between the two pleasures as that you can be a human dissatisfied which is better than being a pig who is satisfied as that you are may not be happy or content but you are doing good which is better than someone who is happy and content but doing bad. Mill is considered a rule utilitarian.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The creed which accepts as the foundation of morals, Utility, or the Greatest Happiness Principle, holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness” (11). That quote is from “Utilitarianism” written by John Stuart Mill. Mill is noted in history as a man who pushed for radical change of social and legal principles using Utilitarianism as his guide. That quote sums up his belief in that theory. In this essay I will be discussing Mill, the theory of Utilitarianism and how that theory relates to contemporary ethical issues.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mill’s perspective on the human condition is one that I favor immensely opposed to Schopenhauer, because it displays an appreciation for what it means to be a human in its truest form. The fact that we are able to innately enjoy pleasures and reflect on the experience is unique and should be valued. Furthermore, we also are capable of enduring mental suffering and advancing through the struggle as a better being on the other side. Both of these situations effectively demonstrate the privilege we are granted by being human. In this paper I will present why Mill makes a strong argument for this case, and also contribute some of my own ideas to towards the concept.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics Kant vs Mill

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mill’s theory of Utilitarianism relates moral actions to those that result in the greatest happiness. This explains Mill’s theory on morality. When happiness is reached, there is pleasure and the absence of pain. Pleasure results from the actions higher in utility. Mill believes there’s a difference between higher and lower qualities of pleasure verses quantity of them. If a pleasure were high, a person would choose it over another pleasure that may come with suffering. Saying this he means a person will choose the higher good. He also speaks about the confusion of happiness with satisfaction. The only way to judge a pleasure is to fully understand the quality of pleasure.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pleasures and pain contribute in determining the classification of one’s actions. In Mill’s Utilitarianism, he examines what determines an action to be considered right or wrong, his own version of the hedonistic utilitarianism argument. He claims that these qualities, including the quantity, are an important factor in determining, when included in the consequences, the criteria of an action. The consequences are significant in determining the results of one’s actions.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    J.S. Mill on the other hand is a Rule utilitarianist which is about agreeing general rules for society as a whole to follow that promote the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people, therefore individual situations where the rules are disobeyed will not be justified even if they bring about more…

    • 709 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant Vs Mill

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages

    John Stuart Mill has a philosophy known as Utilitarianism. In this way of thinking, ethics are based on the maximization of pleasure. In other words, it's based on the consequences of a given action. The basic principle of Utilitarianism is that "actions are right in so far as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness" – happiness equals the absence of pain. Mill also touches on the fact that the quality, not only the quantity of pleasure matters. He illustrates this by saying it is "better to be a human…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rule and Act Utilitrianism

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages

    John Stuart Mill was one of the greatest philosophers of the 19th century. Mill was best renowned for his idea of “Utilitarianism.” Utilitarianism originated from an ethical principle under Jeremy Bentham, who theorized an action is right if it produces the greatest good for the greatest number of people. Mill revised the concept of utility and has brought forth “the Greatest Happiness Principle. Utilitarianism as a whole is considered to be any moral theory corresponding to which an action is right in and only if it conforms to the principle of utility, or productiveness. Utilitarianism represents an extension into moral theory of an experimental, scientific mode of reasoning because it involves the calculation of causal consequences. According to Bentham, an action conforms to the principle of utility if and only if its performance will be more productive of pleasure or happiness, or more preventive of pain or unhappiness, than any alternative. The well being of individuals is the standard of determining what's right and wrong and the consequences of an action. There are different forms of Utilitarianism, two of which are act-utilitarianism and rule-utilitarianism.…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Stuart Mill was once considered “the most influential English-speaking philosopher of the nineteenth century.” From early on in his life, Mill was challenged to think outside the box and question long held views of society from his father. Throughout his life, Mill presented his way of thinking and gave his insight on numerous issues.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Teleology

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Bentham’s system of measurement ensures that everyone’s happiness counts, but no ones counts more than anyone else’s. John Stuart Mill revised utilitarianism, adding the idea that happiness could be measured according to its quality, as well as by its amount. Some pleasures are of a higher quality, and therefore are more valuable than others.…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Utilitarianism, in its most general form, claims that one should assess persons, actions, and institutions by how well they promote human (or perhaps sentient) happiness. This claim Mill shares with his forbears. But he modified their assumptions about human motivation, the nature of happiness, the relationship between happiness…

    • 846 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    As he states “ The corollaries from the principle of utility, like the precepts of every practical art, admit of indefinite improvement, and, in a progressive state of human minds, their improvement is perpetually going on. But to consider the rules of morality as improvable is one thing; to pass over the intermediate generalization entirely and endeavor to test each individual action directly by the first principle is another.”(Mill, 1863) In other words, if we simply choose the action that provides the most happiness to people involved in a certain situation, and apply this mentality to whatever situation we are in, this will bring the most happiness. This doesn’t necessarily mean we have to give up our own happiness, because if everyone did this, none of us would be happy. Therefore, sacrificing our own happiness would only be good if it produced more happiness overall. Just as Mill, I do not believe utilitarianism is too demanding. Utilitarianism is simply a theory and just as any theory there are exceptions to it. We should simply try our best to do acts that brings the most happiness to those around us, when reasonably possible and without sacrificing our own…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Stuart Mill

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages

    John stuart mill believed in the principle of utilitarianism, a moral philosophy focused on the outcome of one’s actions. This is in counter to the Kantian or Aristotelian ethics, which focus on one's actions and the character of the one acting respectively. Utilitarianism according to Mill is a philosophy that seeks to produce the greatest amount of good for the greatest amount of people. The good in that principle being based on Hedonism, a philosophy that believes in maximizing net pleasure. It is as a result of this that Mill uses good instead of right.…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    First of all, there are three different types of happiness or pleasure, namely; hedonism which focuses on for the sake of pleasure, Epicureanism which was brought forward by Epicurus who stated that happiness is freedom from bodily pain and mental distress and lastly, utilitarianism which was originated from Bentham and later was explained further by Mill which will be explained further in this essay. Moreover, Kant’s idea of duty will be compared with that of Bentham and Mill’s idea of utilitarianism.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Individual Hapiness

    • 1346 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Cited: Mill, John Stuart. “Utilitarianism.” Twenty Questions. By G Lee Bowie, Meredith W Michaels, and Robert C Solomon. 2004. Boston: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning, 2011. 600-601. Print.…

    • 1346 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays