The basic tenet of utilitarianism is that we should always act to bring about the greatest amount of good or the least amount of harm in the world as a whole. The good of society is the sum of the good of the individuals in it, including you. As humans we should evaluate our actions solely in terms of the consequences, because they are means to the end of promoting general welfare. What matters most are the consequences of actions. If an individual’s calculation of greatest happiness is a rational, deliberative process, then the result will be a basic agreement about the nature of happiness. This ideology created the notion that humans experience happiness in units. Since the happiness of any one individual counts the same as that of any other, the perspective is democratic in treating everyone’s welfare on an equal …show more content…
One weakness is that the principle of maximizing happiness is so general and vague, that it can be applied in completely opposite ways. We cannot in fact measure happiness, but we can understand what it feels like to be happy. Everyone’s ways of living and feeling are so different from each other, so we cannot set a standard scale of happiness. If a society determines that the greatest happiness lies elsewhere of a minority, there is no guarantee that it will be protected. In this case, it seems that the utilitarianism theory has built an injustice that runs counter to some of our deepest intuitive notions about