Preview

John Stuart Mill's Second Objection To Utilitarianism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
430 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
John Stuart Mill's Second Objection To Utilitarianism
1. According to Sandel, utilitarianism fails to respect individual right and freedom (Sandel, 2009, p. 37). The issue with utilitarianism is that it will do whatever to maximize utility and anything to prevent pain or suffering (Sandel, 2009, p. 34). An example that was mentioned in the book was throwing Christians to the lions, as you can see it fails to respect the individual rights of the Christians. The lions and the crowd watching are maximizing their pleasure while the Christians are suffering pain. The pleasure of the lion and crowd outweighs the pain and suffering of the Christians. The second objection that Sandel has to utilitarianism is a common currency of value, which breaks everything up in a cost benefit analysis (Sandel, 2009, …show more content…
John Stuart Mill’s notion of “higher pleasures” addresses the second objection to utilitarianism - that it reduces all values to a single scale (Sandel, 2009, p. 52). In the book it was mentioned that Mill tries to show utilitarians that they can distinguish higher pleasures from lower ones. Mill talks about how the higher pleasures are those that produce stronger and longer pleasures (Sandel, 2009, p. 52). It is interesting that Bentham doesn’t recognize qualitative distinction between pleasures, as for him pleasure is pleasure and pain is pain. The main focus for Bentham is that he is interested in the intensity and duration of the pleasure or pain (Sandel, 2009, p. 52).The difference between Bentham and Mill is that Bentham sees all pleasures as equal, while Mill believes you can differentiate between higher pleasures from lower ones by experiencing it (Sandel, 2009, p. 51-52). Mill’s notions was successful in improving Bentham’s utilitarianism because you can experience both the higher and lower pleasures and then determine the desirable one (Sandel, 2009, p. 54). As mentioned in the book Mills tried to save utilitarianism by recasting it as a more humane way. Also morality plays a major role because Mill was concerned about the humanitarian’s views such as individual rights and higher/lower
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Mill's Utilitarianism Chapter Summary
    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mill's Utilitarianism Chapter Summary

    To summarize this Mill’s chapter two about what utilitarianism is, basically meaning that individuals would find some kind of pleasure that are more desirable and more valuable to themselves are inherently good. Utilitarianism is pleasurable when the actions are good; when the actions are bad the pleasure decreases. To Mill he compares human pleasures are as equal as animalistic pleasures. It depends on what kind of pleasure people are seeking. For this purpose, Mill mentioned that people would have to look within quality of the pleasure people are seeking as well as quantity.…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Analysis Of The Theory Of Utilitarianism By John Stuart Mill
    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Analysis Of The Theory Of Utilitarianism By John Stuart Mill

    “The creed which accepts as the foundation of morals, Utility, or the Greatest Happiness Principle, holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness” (11). That quote is from “Utilitarianism” written by John Stuart Mill. Mill is noted in history as a man who pushed for radical change of social and legal principles using Utilitarianism as his guide. That quote sums up his belief in that theory. In this essay I will be discussing Mill, the theory of Utilitarianism and how that theory relates to contemporary ethical issues.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    John Stuart Mill Ethical Dilemma
    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages

    John Stuart Mill Ethical Dilemma

    The complex ethical dilemma to be addressed using the three tests for an ethical decision,…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Who Is John Stuart Mill's Utilitarianism
    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Who Is John Stuart Mill's Utilitarianism

    Throughout history philosophers have introduced new ideas and belief systems into society in hopes to better the world they lived in. Many philosophers have introduced ideas that are still in practice in American government. While popular belief among those trying to pave a path forward was that government, as it stood, was tyrannical and overly restrictive, however John Stuart Mill believed that through government happiness and freedom can be achieved.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    phil 111 exam
    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages

    phil 111 exam

    1. Utilitarianism is moral theory that tries to lay a set of rules that you should follow to achieve the most good or pleasure from any one act. Two popular proponents of this systems are philosophers by the name of Jeremy Bentham and James Mill. They both have different ideas for how one should go about the use of utilitarianism to achieve the greatest happiness. Bentham's approach is often called quantitative utilitarianism in which Bentham came up with an idea called the felicific calculus which is a way one can measure the level of happiness that can come out of one certain decision. For Bentham pleasure is countable and tangible, by this I mean that pleasure can be used as sort of a measuring system for what should be morally right or wrong. Now on the other hand James Mill takes a different view of utilitarianism in which he allows for so called greater pleasure. Meaning that even though the decision that the felicific calculus tells you to make may not be the most pleasurable because some decisions have the potential to grow overtime into a more rewarding pleasure. This is where Mills is commonly referred to as a qualitative utilitarianism because he differentiates between the qualities of the pleasures you can choose. This greater pleasure idea, though, also raises a few questions in such that is it really that the decision is a so called greater pleasure or is it that you choose such decision because of the opportunity to create more pleasure. It seems as though pleasure is still the end result when you make this decision it is just that you have the opportunity to fail or be successful in this decisions which is not really consistent with the idea of pleasure but more so of opportunity.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Mill: Utilitarianism, Chapters 1-3
    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mill: Utilitarianism, Chapters 1-3

    In chapter number one titled “General Remarks” Mill starts off by talking about what is to be seen as morally right and morally wrong things, yet no one has a complete understanding for what is actually morally right and wrong. He then talks about “Moral Faculty” and two different views or opinions on the subject. Mill states in his text that “Our moral faculty, according to all those of its interpreters who are entitled to the name of thinkers, supplies us only with the general principles of moral judgments; it is a branch of our reason, not of our sensitive faculty; and must be looked to for the abstract doctrines of morality, not for perception of it in the concrete. The intuitive, no less than what may be termed the inductive, school of ethics, insists on the necessity of general laws.” The quote that Mill states is very outstanding for the reason of “applying the concept of law to ones certain case,” this is what Mill is trying to relate between the two different views. Mill also states that the differences between the two is where the “source from which they derive their authority” but yet they both agree on the concept of “moral law.” So as the chapter is coming to an end Mill comments on how “Utilitarianism has had a tremendous influence in shaping moral doctrines, even among the people who reject the principle.” Since our class had just been reading text from Kant his “idea of law” or “will” is still fresh in my mind and can easily be seen as a difference to what Mill is stating in the “Utilitarianism.” I can directly relate the two ideas because Kant’s “will” for a rational being may be thought of “the objective laws of reason and morality” or “subjective needs and interests,” which is what Mill is talking about in his two different views of “Moral Faculty.” Kant also states that “Act only on that maxim through which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law” but Mill argues the point…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    John Stuart Mill's Utilitarianism
    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages

    John Stuart Mill's Utilitarianism

    Pleasures and pain contribute in determining the classification of one’s actions. In Mill’s Utilitarianism, he examines what determines an action to be considered right or wrong, his own version of the hedonistic utilitarianism argument. He claims that these qualities, including the quantity, are an important factor in determining, when included in the consequences, the criteria of an action. The consequences are significant in determining the results of one’s actions.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Main strengths of a Utilitarian ethical system
    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Main strengths of a Utilitarian ethical system

    Utilitarianism, the theory that actions are right if they useful for the majority, the greatest happiness and pleasure for the greatest and majority of people. Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) was an English moral philosopher concerned with social reform, Bentham wanted people to seek pleasure and avoid pain. On the other hand John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) who was a great admirer of Bentham; however, he believed in the principle of utility and the idea that please should be ranked according to quality not quantity. For example: eating a mars bar is a poorer pleasure compared to listening to poetry. Mill believing in pleasures of the mind is greater than pleasures of the body (eating). Within this essay I shall be discussing the different views of Bentham and Mill and how their theories are strengths for the utilitarian system.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    a) What are the key concepts of utilitarianism?
    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages

    a) What are the key concepts of utilitarianism?

    Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) developed his ethical system of utilitarianism around the idea of pleasure. John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) later furthered and many believe he improved Bentham’s theory (Mill is often linked to Rule Utilitarianism) but still followed many of his original ideas. The theory is based on ancient hedonism, which pursued physical pleasure and avoided physical pain. Hedonism saw human beings as “Under the governance of two sovereign masters of pain and pleasure.” So a key concept that Bentham developed was the belief we are controlled by the desire to seek out pleasure and avoid pain bringing about the greatest happiness principle which is choosing the path that gives the greatest amount of people the greatest amount of happiness and the least amount of pain. This makes the theory eudaimonic.…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    John Stuart Mill Utilitarianism
    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages

    John Stuart Mill Utilitarianism

    John Stuart Mill was considered a Utilitarian. The philosophy of Utilitarianism is that an action should be decided by what is best for society. Mill’s philosophy was in part developed by his upbringing as a child. His childhood was restricted and he was raised in an enviroment where is emotionally needs were not met. Also his father was a friend of Jeremy Bentham. Bentham was a philosopher credited with starting the beginings of the Utiltarianism philosophy. He focused on the relationships between the social classes and working towards social reform. His philosophy focused more on social conditions and human behavior than previous philosophies had. He looked at practical solutions for societies problems and less on the metaphysical aspects…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Marx and Mills
    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Marx and Mills

    John Stuart Mill suggests that a person's ethical decision-making process should be based solely upon the amount of happiness that the person can receive. Although Mill fully justifies himself, his approach lacks certain criteria for which happiness can be considered. Happiness should be judged, not only by pleasure, but by pain as well. This paper will examine Mill's position on happiness, and the reasoning behind it. Showing where there are agreements and where there are disagreements will critique the theory of Utilitarianism. By showing the problems that the theory have will reveal what should make up ethical decision-making. John Stuart Mill supports and explains his reasoning in his book, Utilitarianism. Mill illustrates the guidelines of his theory. Mill defines utilitarianism as the quest for happiness. His main point is that one should guide his or her judgements by what will give pleasure. Mill believes that a person should always seek to gain pleasure and reject pain. Utilitarianism also states that the actions of a person should be based upon the "greatest happiness principle". This principle states that ethical actions command the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people. Mill further explores the need for pleasure by noting "a being of higher faculties requires more to make him happy." . He acknowledges that some pleasures are more alluring than others are. He adds to this by making known that when placing value in things to calculate pleasure, not only quantity important but quality as well. Mill's criteria for happiness is easily understood, some statements that he gives are questionable. John Stuart Mill plainly laid out what he believes that the basis for ethical decision-making. First, the pursuit of pleasure is directly related to happiness. This idea can be easily accepted. It is natural for a person to focus his goals on things that will bring him pleasure. It would be absurd if someone's goal in life was to be poor and…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    John Stuart Mill's Argument
    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages

    John Stuart Mill's Argument

    Two conclusions emerge fairly decisively from the cursory analysis presented above: first, that the doctor should not even consider performing the sperm retrieval procedure before Mr. M is medically diagnosed as brain dead; and second, that even then he ought to consider it only if the mother were to provide specific proof not only of Mr. M's prior consent to undergo the procedure, but also of his intent to transfer the harvested sperm into his mother's possession for the purposes of selecting an inseminating a surrogate on his behalf in the event of his death.…

    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Explain the general principles of utilitarianism, including reference to both act and rule utilitarianism
    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Explain the general principles of utilitarianism, including reference to both act and rule utilitarianism

    John Stuart Mill (1806-1871) decided to refine Bentham’s theory of utilitarianism. However when he refined the theory he kept the same general principle as Bentham which is maximising…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mill's View of Lower/Higher Pleasures
    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mill's View of Lower/Higher Pleasures

    Mill is a utilitarian philosopher who lives by the Greatest Happiness Principle, in which there is a clear distinction between both lower and higher pleasures. Though thoroughly explained, one must also question the justification of these pleasures. Many of these beliefs leave the reader hanging on the edge, with further questions that need to be answered. What is the exact distinction between the lower and higher pleasures? And how are higher pleasures measured as most valuable? How clearly is Mill’s view of lower and higher pleasures justified?…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    John Stuart Mill's Ethical Views Of Utilitarianism
    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages

    John Stuart Mill's Ethical Views Of Utilitarianism

    English philosopher, John Stuart Mill’s, introduced the ethical views of Utilitarianism, stating that whatever maximizes happiness for the greatest number of people is consider to be the greatest good. According to Utilitarianism, an action is morally right if it promotes happiness and morally wrong if it promotes pain. Utilitarianism is an attempt to answer the question “What should we do?” and its answer is that we ought to act in a way that the consequence produce happiness.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics