Preview

Jonathan Barr Argumentative Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1242 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Jonathan Barr Argumentative Essay
James Bain and Jonathan Barr were convicted for crime they have never committed. Like many others, false allegations cause innocent individuals to be arrested for crimes they have not committed. Results from DNA testing have been used as great evidence to help people reach their freedom from being behind bars. To prevent the conviction of innocent individuals, DNA tests should be mandatory to take when proving one’s evidence.

James Bain was a man who was arrested without any DNA evidence to prove his innocence. First, James Bain was found guilty for the raping of a nine-year-old-boy in 1974. The crime was committed in Lake Wales, Florida (“James Bain”). This statement shows why and when James Bain was arrested. Next, the victim who was raped
…show more content…
Jonathan Barr was in prison for fourteen years and was released in 2011 (Warden). This statement proves the release of Jonathan and the amount of time he spent in prison. Jonathan Barr would have never been released if other individuals never helped him out. The University of Chicago Law School students in the Exoneration Project helped with the release of Jonathan Barr, who was falsely convicted of murder (The University of Chicago Staff). The students of this school helped Jonathan be released from prison. Finally, the real murderer of Cateresa Matthews has been found. Five years after the DNA tests were completed, in August 2016, DNA results led to the murder being committed by Willie Randolph (Warden). This acknowledges that after all these years, the real murderer has finally been found. The charges against James Bain and Jonathan Barr were finally lifted from each individual because of their innocence.

In conclusion, both James Bain and Jonathan Barr were proven innocent with DNA evidence. These innocent individuals have spent a portion of their lives in prison for crimes they did not commit. These cases prove how DNA testing should always be considered with most cases because it can lead to more accurate results. Evidence from DNA testing helped to prove the innocence of James Bain and Jonathan Barr, who were falsely

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    There was a hair found in a van with stolen goods that was said to link James to the van in the garage of the rented house of Perry. Perry disappeared before the hearing so it was said the James killed him so he could not go to court against him. But DNA testing was not performed. LAter the hair was sent to London for testing and proved that both were innocent.…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    While this was going on, Darryl Hunt’s original lawyer Mark Rabil was working with some scientist to figure out if the DNA inside of Deborah Sykes and on the crime scene, was Darryl Hunt’s or some other gentleman’s. The DNA result came back and the DNA that was found at the crime scene, did not match Darryl Hunt’s DNA at all (Innocent Project). Although the proof was there, Darryl Hunt’s appeal for trial was rejected by the court, because the people believed that even with that evidence it still didn’t prove Darryl Hunt…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dash cam captured a man driving the wrong way on I-95 Thursday night, nearly hitting several drivers.…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ronald Cotton Case

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages

    On July 29th, 1984, Jennifer Thompson woke to a stranger in her room, who proceeded to brutally rape her, with a knife close to her throat. Jennifer stayed as calm as possible, trying to identify her attacker to ID him to the police once she escaped. Eventually Jennifer managed to escape and informed the police department. When presented with a small number of suspects that the police department had identified, Jennifer picked Ronald Cotton. Ronald Cotton was informed of the charges and actually went to the police station to clear his name. Ronald already had a less-than-desirable record with the police which could have played a role in his conviction. Not only was Ronald Cotton a young black male but already had a criminal record for a mistake he did when he was only a kid. Nonetheless, based on that fact alone the jury will see Ronald in a different light and will have an impact on the verdict. The same could also be said for all five individuals of the central park five. Prior to the conviction of all five, Kevin Richardson, 14, Raymond Santana, 14, Yusef Salaam, 15, Antron McCray, 15, and Kharey Wise, 16, also confessed to —“chasing after bicyclists, assaulting pedestrians, and (in two separate incidents) pummeling two men into unconsciousness with a metal pipe, stones, punches, and kicks to the head.” these confessions were caught on tape. The press coverage surrounding the case made…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On the dusk of March 4, 1974, an African American by the name of James Bain is convicted of raping a nine-year-old boy at a baseball field in Lake Wales, Florida. The victim reported that the offender was 17 or 18 years old and had bushy sideburns. After police revealed photographs of six potential suspects, only two of them had sideburns. On the grounds that James Bain has side burns, he was interrogated around midnight the next day. Upon interrogation, Bain declared that he was watching television on the night of the attack. Even with an alibi backed by his sister, the police still arrested him. On the day of the trail, the FBI presented the victim's underwear that contained the rapist’s semen. Although they had the semen of the rapist, DNA…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sadly, many people have served time for crimes they did not commit. Unfortunately, this is an ongoing epidemic that has terrible consequences for the innocent people who are wrongfully accused and incarcerated. In class, we watched a video about a man who was convicted of burglary and rape in the first degree and sentenced to life plus fifty years. According to a reporter by the name of Lesley Stahl, who did a 60-minute Broadcast on this case, the individual who was wrongfully accused and convicted of this crime, endured 11 years in prison until he was finally exonerated of all charges and released from prison.…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Woodall’s conviction of rape was overturned by a new DNA test which acquitted him (Principles and Practice). This acquittal is what brought the spotlight down on to Fred Zain since his testimony differed from the new results. The new results found that the hair evidence was actually from Woodall’s beard rather than pubic hair that Zain stated before. Zain had “reportedly never bothered to compare it with a hair sample from the man who owned the car” (Principles and Practice). An independent expert later determined that “Woodall could not possibly have committed the crimes because DNA evidence cleared him” (Ethics in forensic Science). Due to the uncoherent results and Woodall’s continuous plead of innocence, Woodall sued the State of West Virginia for false imprisonment which hauled Fred Zain in for criminal accusations (Scientific Fraud). This started an investigation on all of Zain’s work throughout his career which was ordered by the West Virginia Supreme…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander was charged in four separate incidences but he only went to trial on three of the cases due to been cleared in the fourth case. The fourth case he was cleared in was due to DNA testing, according to innocenceproject.org “the victim and her fiancé both had identified and were certain that Alexander was the perpetrator. The DNA tested in that incident matched the DNA profile of another man.” When at trial, one of the victims identified Alexander as being the assailant. According to the Innocentproject.org “The victim described the perpetrator as being chest free of hair and tattoos. Alexander’s chest had tattoos and was hairy.” Alexander was then convicted of two cases and was then sentenced to 70 years in prison. Alexander was convicted of the remaining two cases, but mitochondrial DNA testing was not accessible at the time of his conviction, but it was later used to clear him of one of the two crimes he was convicted for. Michael Murphy had confessed to the crime and hairs from the scene had concluded that it matched Murphy’s profile and not Alexander’s. Then that made prosecutors think that maybe Alexander hadn’t committed the seconded incident he was convicted of. Even though, the victim and another eye witness named him as the perpetrator. Modus operandi in the second incident was similar to an assault committed by Mark…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mr Mallard Case Study

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This is particularly important when the guilt or innocence of the accused depends on this evidence. In the same vein lawyers are to be trained in the use and misuse of DNA, so they can decipher whether the DNA evidence is circumstantial or directly related to the crime. Thus in the Australian judicial system, similar measures have now been put in place by the various courts of appeal to avoid mistakes in convicting the innocence or guilt of an individual during a trial (Vincent). However more still needs to be done to avoid these miscarriages of justice from occurring in the…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are many examples of wrongful convictions that have led to deaths of innocents. When a person is sent to prison for a wrongful conviction, there is a chance of getting that person their life back, but for a person who is wrongfully convicted and sent for the death penalty, there is no way of giving the person their deserved life back. Cameron Todd Willingham was executed February, 2004, for murdering his three young children by arson at the family home Corsicana, Texas. Gerald Hurst reviewed the case documents, including the trial transcriptions and an hour-long videotape of the aftermath of the fire scene and said in December 2004 that "There 's nothing to suggest to any reasonable arson investigator that this was an arson fire. It was just a fire." In 2010, he innocence project filed a lawsuit against the State of Texas, seeking a judgment of "Official oppression." Statistics likely understate the actual problem of wrongful convictions because once an execution has occurred there is often insufficient motivation and finance to keep a case open, and it becomes unlikely at that point that the miscarriage of justice will ever be exposed. In the case of Joseph Roger O 'Dell III, in 1997 for a rape and murder, a prosecuting attorney bluntly argued in court in 1998 that if posthumous DNA results…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The technique while effective against guilty suspects have a tendency to elicit false confessions from innocent suspects. The Reid technique is applied the same way for both adults and juvenile suspects. However, based on the low maturity level of juvenile offenders they are more likely to wrongfully implicate themselves in criminal activities that they did not have any part of. Confessions carries a lot of weight in a court proceeding, as suspects are often convicted without any physical or corroborating evidence. It was not until recent years that a prevalence of wrongful convictions through false confession was noticed. Wrongfully convicted people spend many years in prison before they were exonerated by DNA evidence. Furthermore, contrary to popular beliefs, numerous studies found that innocent suspects do provide investigators with false incriminating…

    • 1927 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    These practices of misconduct in result in dire consequences where an action of a single individual can destroy innocent individuals and further diminish public confidence in the justice system. For example, Collins & Jarvis (2009) found that the Innocence Project cited many cases where forensic scientist misconduct was a key player to the wrongful conviction. In the case of James Ochoa, even though DNA and fingerprint analysis exonerated Ochoa from the lists of suspects, the prosecutors were so convinced that he was guilty of armed robbery, that they had a forensic expert falsely testify in court on this case. Due to this, the testimony of the scientist was based solely on the interpretation and influence of the prosecutor. This argument relates to the idea of forensic testimony and the practice of fabricating or misreporting evide is a key issue that is posing a significant problem to our criminal justice system. These can include "withholding laboratory reports, analysis, or the existence of evidence. Other cases involved fabrication, including falsifying or altering lab reports and concealment of exculpatory information regarding hair comparison" (Garrett & Neufeld, 2009). For example, in William Gregory's case, a forensic analyst did not report crucial information of how at least one piece of hair did not match Gregory's. Additionally, it was determined that many cases…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This paper explores deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) collection and its relationship to solving crimes. The collection of DNA is one of the most important steps in identifying a suspect in a crime. DNA evidence can either convict or exonerate an individual of a crime. Furthermore, the accuracy of forensic identification of evidence has the possibility of leaving biased effects on a juror (Carrell, Krauss, Liberman, Miethe, 2008). This paper examines Carrells et al’s research along with three other research articles to review how DNA is collected, the effects that is has on a juror and the pros and cons of DNA collection in the Forensic Science and Criminal Justice community.…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Williams, L. (2006, May 1). DNA Frees Rape Accused. The Daily Observer , p. 1 & 3.…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Wrongfully Accused

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Anyone who has been wrongfully accused of doing something they know they did not do will understand the immense frustration that comes with it. Fortunately for most people, that boils down to someone saying they took the last donut or let slip a bit of gas. Unfortunately for others, it involves horrible crimes that lead to hard time in prison. Here is one of the cases of people being accused and convicted of terrible things they never actually did. Darryl hunt, Race relations are always a touchy subject, and they were at the heart of the 1984 case of Darryl Hunt, an African American man from Winston-Salem, North Carolina. At the age of nineteen, Hunt was convicted of the rape and murder of a white woman named Deborah Sykes, despite the fact that there was no physical evidence tying him to the crimes. Even with zero evidence pointing to Hunt, he was sentenced by an all-white jury to life in prison. In 1994, Hunt was actually cleared of the rape when DNA testing proved he had never committed that crime. Despite the rape being central to the overall crime, he spent an additional nine years in prison until a man named Willard Brown confessed to both acts. So after nineteen years of life in prison, Hunt was finally exonerated in 2004. Since being released from prison, he has worked with "The Innocence Project" and founded the Darryl Hunt Project for Freedom and Justice, as well as the Darryl Hunt Freedom Fighters, in order to help other wrongfully convicted men and women. Even the criminal justice system goes astray sometimes. How quickly police officers, prosecutors and judges catch those errors can mean the difference between justice and tragedy. Still, a…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays