Preview

Jonathan Luw

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
579 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Jonathan Luw
Dr. Jonathan Louw is a successful corporate minded business man his specialty is in leading deal breaking acquisition and negotiations. His success came from expanding the growth of Adcock Ingram globally in the pharmaceutical/healthcare industry. His passion for success unknowingly, may have cost him a chance to ensure a strong position against his competitor Aspen Pharmacare. While negotiating with Ciplamed and Cipla India, Louw may have forgotten the key skills in negotiation like: creating value, claiming value and building trust to acquire this agreement.
When negotiating, creating value for both parties will give each party an understanding how working together will create success for both companies. Negotiation don’t stop once the deal
…show more content…

Present more than what you bring to the table. Showing that both parties are equally important will effectively help gain some momentum in the right direction. Dr. Jonathan Louw was very persistent about executing the acquisition with Ciplamed. He knew gaining the contract would strengthen his organization against his competitor Aspen Pharmacare, which whom Ciplamed was already partner with. Even though Ciplamed withdrew from the meeting with Louw, he still was relentless about achieving Ciplamed as a partner. A meeting of the minds must be present in order to continue …show more content…

Meanwhile, Dr. Louw continue to work, without discussing any other key elements with Ciplamed. Louw believe he had the deal. Throughout this time Ciplamed interest no longer existed. Without any more discussions with Ciplamed, Louw continue to move forward setting meeting up with his shareholder to discuss the shares and price offer. With the offer on the table Ciplamed did not respond. Shocked, Louw wanted answers, reaching out to Ciplamed he needed a response. Going back and forth with correspondents both parties were addressing their many issues the other. Basically Ciplamed was not please how things were going and make their choice a longer time ago. Without meeting of the minds any deal can be

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fi561 You Decide

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I’m concerned about synergy and integration issues between our highly research-oriented development of pharmaceuticals here at Merck, and a prescription medicine marketing company like Medco. I am concerned that the cultures and operations of the two companies aren’t going to mix well, and that this deal would result in an expensive failure.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    City of Middlevale

    • 1798 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In negotiations there are key stakeholders. These are usually the parties that have the most to gain or lose in the…

    • 1798 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sirtris

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages

    * (b) whether to postpone a deal until Sirtris had more clinical data. Was this the right point in the company’s history to do a deal?…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mt Mercy Case Summary

    • 152 Words
    • 1 Page

    There are several key stakeholders in the environment of Mt. Mercy that played a role during the acquisition period of the Abbott purchase. The stakeholders include but are not limited to Mt. Mercy’s board members, their competitors, and the media. The board members of Mt. Mercy are internal stakeholders with a high level of power as they have the ability to reject the acquisition. Additionally, Mt. Mercy’s competitor, Dr. Martin Leeham, is an external stakeholder with a low level of power as exemplified by the case. Ultimately, Dr. Leeham’s efforts fell short as he was incapable of preventing Sister Mary Theresa from acquiring Abbott Hospital. Additionally, the media, as an external stakeholder, played an influential role in the acquisition…

    • 152 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jonathan Edward

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Jonathan Edwards’s sermons were addressed during a time of spiritual restoration, the Great Awakening. During his sermons, Edwards uses a selection of persuasive methods, containing descriptive images and simple metaphors to influence sinners to repent. Edwards used many images to convey the power of God to the people because many of the people he preached to were illiterate and couldn’t understand complex words.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Paul Levy Deaconess CS

    • 876 Words
    • 3 Pages

    2. In such a large merger, why was clinical operations much more important to lead and process with than financial integration?…

    • 876 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ciba

    • 11769 Words
    • 32 Pages

    http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~igiddy/cases/cibaalliedcase.htm This is a case study of a competitive merger, in which the Swiss chemicals company, Ciba Specialty Chemicals, played the role of a White Knight in a bidding war for a British chemical company, Allied Colloids. The case study is intended to highlight a number of interesting and important features of hostile and competitive M&As and related issues. Read the following articles, news releases (there are some overlaps). They are hyperlinked to original sources but have been copied below to save you time searching for each document online. You do need to visit the websites of the companies involved and other online sources to do a comprehensive and a decent analysis of this case. If any of the companies named in the document is no longer exist because it has merged with others or been taken over by others, you still can get information to answer the questions. Answer the following questions: 1. What caused Allied Colloids to become a takeover target? 2. How did Ciba value the gains from the merger or acquisition? 3. What effect did the acquisition have on Ciba's balance sheet and performance? 4. Who won? Who lost? Be specific and provide detailed analysis. 5. Post-script: Search online and provide a brief post script of the case since the acquisition. Your answers to questions 1-4 must be independent of your answer to question 5. Your answer to this question may contradict your answers to 1-4 above. Prepare an executive report when you answer the above questions. State each question in italics (blue color) followed by your answer to the questions. Be detailed and if you are using any table, graphs, charts, and exhibits in the appendix, make sure make proper references to the proper appendix. Do not simply state see appendix. Be specific. And, do not state a brief phrase or statement and then state see appendix. Your answers must be concise but self-explanatory…

    • 11769 Words
    • 32 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    I learned from this negotiation that in claiming value negotiation, there are ways to include creating value issues. We could have negotiated including “if you do this, then you get that”. I also learned that it is important to know the reference points before you negotiate to get a fair deal. Parties may have assymetric information, but sharing information helps achieving your…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Sluggers Come Home

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Both parties want to make the deal. They both know it could benefit both sides to make the negotiation flow, but there’s some differences between that makes a little hard to involve in.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The purpose of this paper is to analyze a complex negotiation between Pat Olafson (Viking Investments) and Sandy Wood (WoodCrafters), from the perspective of Sandy. More specifically, this paper is written from the perspective of Sandy’s legal counsel. It is intended to provide Sandy with support and guidance for his negotiations with Pat. This negotiation holds critical significance for Sandy’s future, as business owner, a homeowner, and an employer. As Pat Olafson’s business seems to be thriving, Sandy finds himself at a critical impasse in his professional career. His…

    • 2051 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The value of the gains that Ciba saw in the takeover of Allied Colloids was based on financial reporting, improving product performance as well as increasing value for their shareholders. At its core, Ciba desired to produce and sell high quality chemicals and enhance the longevity and performance of their products. Being the worldwide company that Ciba was, it was their goal to produce positive results within the global market. As a leader in biological chemicals, Ciba SC was dedicated in meeting the needs of the healthcare, agriculture, and industry. Ciba felt the acquisition between Allied Colloid would enhance the quality and value of their business as well as product performance. Ultimately Ciba’s goal is to create value for its shareholders and the acquisition of Allied Colloids is just one step in the process. Other steps include evaluation of strategic…

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Almost every aspect of the complexity of the merger can be explained through Rhône-Poulenc’s financial constraints. RP’s motives to acquire Rorer were to create crucial capital for its own strategic entry into pharmaceuticals. RP could not buy Rorer either in cash or shares due to the following factors:…

    • 3257 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three days later, Lafley met Kilts’s personal office in Rye, New York. They spoke the entire afternoon and agreed to expand negotiations to include select senior managers. At one points , Kilts asked Lafley why he didn’t bring any bankers or lawyers. Lafley said they won’t necessary. Kilts, Gillette CFO Chuck Cramb, and vice chairman Ed DeGRaan met with Lafley and his CFO, Clayt Daley, to work out the merger teams. Culture and tone were major issues for Lafley. “we were looking for a collaborative culture,“ he said. “In fact, I decided that we were going to be collaborative in the negotiations. We had a friendly deal here, and there was no reason not to have the cards on the table.” Lafley called someone that both he and Kilts respected, Rajat Gupta, former managing director of McKinsey, who urged Kilts to give Lafley an open look at potential cost synergies and a peek at Gillette’s planned technological innovations. Kilts agreed. But come December 2005, they halted negotiations, realizing that they couldn’t strike an…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Negotiators must be willing to freely reveal their TRUE obejctives and to listen to each other carefully.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How to succeed in business negotiation? The different negotiators at the talks are for different purposes. The goal of the negotiation is to reach an agreement, but not a war or a game of chess. Negotiation is not to kill each other. During the negotiation, even if one made a great sacrifice, the entire negotiation pattern should be both sides feel something.If the negotiating parties both adhere to their own position, the negotiators will get into trouble. Both sides in the commercial negotiations to and should consider the interests of both sides. The agreement is based on the principle, but not the desire of each respect or position, considering the interests of both sides a win-win.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays