Preview

Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation Case Summary

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
363 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation Case Summary
Facts: The parties to the lawsuit are Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation (the defendants) and the National Labor Relations Board (the plaintiffs). The National Labor Relations Board found the Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation to violate the principles of National Relations Act of 1935. Thus, they decided to charge and order Jones & Laughlin, the executives of the Steel CORP, to drop all practices within their corporation that violated the principles of the National Labor Relations Act and to follow their ultimatum. Furthermore, Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp denied the National Relations Boards petition, and instead opted to take the dispute to the Circuit Court of Appeals. Here the case was undecided because the court argued that cases as these

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    1. (TCO A) An alternative available when the seller is exposed to continued risks of ownership through return of the product is (Points : 6)…

    • 2248 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of Keller v. Inland Metals All Weather Conditioning, Inc. Inland Metals did have an express warranty with the humidifier it sold to Keller. According to NOLO (2015) “an express warranty is a verbal or written statement that guarantees that a product is of a certain quality or will work in a certain way or for a certain amount of time.” In the case of Keller v. Inland Metal, Inland Metals provided both verbal and written statements about the quality of the humidifier they sold the Keller’s and that the humidifier would perform a certain way. Inland Metals met with the Kellers and sent the Kellers a letter discussing the humidifier and how it will handle their needs and reduce odors and humidity from their pool.…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yes, it is clear to me how and why the judge was able to include those who were not specificity directed by the company’s actions to be included in the outcome of the ruling. Title VII was put in place to help protect minorities in the workplace and those in search of employment. This Act which was passed in 1964, prohibits discriminations in regards to the process of hiring, firing, and training, promoting and disciple along with the advertisement of open positions. This Act also includes any workplace decisions that are based on an employees or an applicant’s race, gender, national origin, or religion. The Title VII Act goes as far as including hiring, pay, and the terms of employment, available training layoffs and benefits. The Local 28 Steel Metal Workers had their hiring and promotion system worded and set up so that only white males would be interested, accepted and feel comfortable in applying for the apprenticeship position along with the ability to move up the union ladder into the union and journeymen position. The goal of the apprenticeship was to find themselves in the local 28 union. This process was set to up to discourage minority’s (specifically black males) from applying. Thus the sheet metal group local 28 was not only in violation of the Title VII Act but also the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), The court system (attempted) to step in to make the sheet metal workers union of local 28 compliant with the (EEOC) and the Title VII Act without success as eighteen years the steel workers were still not compliant with the courts orders.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Union Pacific Case Summary

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Complainant began her employment as an Associate Systems Consultant (Assoc. Sys. Consult.) on July 25, 2011. She was a member of the Information Technology (IT) Team, referred to as Application Development-Operations. Jason Hochwender, Director, Information Technology , oversees the Application Development area. The Assoc. Sys. Consult. position is associated with a specific career path designed for individuals who contribute within a team environment. The duties of an Assoc. Sys. Consult. include, but are not limited to the following:…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A fast food chain filed an action in the trial court to compel a town's building inspector to issue a building permit and to review the denial by the town's board of selectmen of the chain's application for a common victualler's license. All parties agreed that the chain was entitled to a building permit, but the trial court affirmed the decision that denied the application for a common victualler's license. The chain appealed. The court determined that there was no evidence that the board acted arbitrarily or capriciously in denying the license and there was no basis for disturbing the board's decision. The court also determined that the decision was not tainted by the participation of a member of the board who was employed by a competitor of the fast food chain.…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Facts: Hobby Lobby is a family owned arts and crafts store that runs on Christian principles. The companies statement of purpose is “honoring the Lord in all [they] do by operating the company in a manner consistent with Biblical principles.” The family does not believe in the use of contraception but under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), the company is required to offer a minimum coverage health care plan that includes forms of contraception. The plaintiffs filed suit to challenge the requirement to provide contraceptive method to their employees under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), the First Amendment (Free Exercise…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of Auto Workers V. Johnson Controls, the Plaintiffs brought a class action suit against Johnson Control in federal district courts over illegal sex discrimination under Title VII. The district court entered a summary judgment for Johnson Controls. The court of appeals affirmed the district court’s decision, leading the plaintiff to then appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. J. Blackmun delivered the opinion of the court in which Marshall, Stevens, O’Connor, and Souter joined. J. White filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in judgment, in which Rehnquist and Kennedy joined. J. Scalia filed an opinion concurring in judgment. Case was decided in March 20, 1991.…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    JUSTIA US Law. Christine Stevens ex rel. Mark Stevens v. Hickman Community Health Care Services, Inc. et al.-CONCUR AND DISSENT (Dissenting). Retrieved from. http://law.justia.com/cases/tennessee/workers-Conpensation/2013/m2012-00582-sc-s 09-cv-0.html…

    • 1674 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Study 2 1 Assignment

    • 595 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2.) Fortin’s supervisor had no knowledge of her union activity but laid her off on the basis of her poor performance evaluation. Give reasons why a court should uphold or override the supervisor’s decision.…

    • 595 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Author: Karen A. Wager , Frances Wickham Lee , John P. Glaser , Lawton Robert Burns…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Supreme Court of the United States: United States v Jones (Oct 2011). Retrieved on September 8, 1014 from http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/10-1259.pdf…

    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sherbert v. Verner et al., Members of South Carolina Employment Security Commission, et al. (1963): Retrieved from http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/curiae/html/374-398/001.htm…

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Indian Removal Act

    • 1618 Words
    • 7 Pages

    One aspect to this case would be that it was the first one in history to use “judicial review.” This allowed courts to void acts from Congress that they deemed unconstitutional.…

    • 1618 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The company is not found in violation of sections 8(a)(5) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act. They gave the union multiple proposals and informed the union that due to competitive wages they were implementing the wage increase. This is also to reduce the chance of employees fleeing. The union never responded with any counterproposals. In contrast to this ruling, the case of, Winn Dixie Stores Inc v. National Labor Relations Board, 1978, The ALJ found them in violation of section 8(a)(5) and (1) of the Act because it amounted to a unilateral increase in wages without giving notice to the union and without giving the union a meaningful opportunity to make…

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Court found that there was no inequality of bargaining power between the Plaintiff and the Defendants. The Plaintiff was a novice manager and the Defendants had some industry experience.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays