Preview

Journal Review: Marx & Collins

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
827 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Journal Review: Marx & Collins
Marx, “Estranged Labour”

In this article that I read by Karl Marx entitled “Estranged Labor”, it states that “With the increasing value of the world of things proceeds in direct proportion the devaluation of the world of men (p.31)”. This basically means that the materialistic items being made by workers are considered more valuable than the worker himself. This is because the more labor that the worker puts forth, the more he produces. The world consumes his products and places value on them, rather than the worker who makes the product. And, the products being sold are more expensive or valuable than what the worker is being paid to make the product. A commodity is something that can be bought or sold. Labor turns the worker into a commodity because the worker can be bought. The worker himself becomes property of whatever factory or organization he works for.
In the process of making these material goods, Marx believes that the worker becomes estranged or alienated. This is because the worker makes the products but isn’t able to keep it. The worker is also alienated from labor or the act of production because he puts time and labor into making the product. He is alienated from the nature of the material since he has no direct contact with the materials as they began in their natural forms, coming from the earth. He is also separated from himself his own emotions and feelings and since he must conduct himself according to the company policies.

Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, “Class Struggle”

All history has to do with class struggle because there has always been an oppressor (ruler) and people being oppressed, which causes the oppressed people to struggle for more power and the oppressors to try to retain power. This struggle for power is present in every society, and is the cause for class distinction. Marx and Engels give the history of the class struggle by stating that in the beginning there was primitive capitalism which didn’t involve class or

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Romeo And Juliet is an amazing play written by the all knowing William Shakespeare. It is a love story/tragedy that includes the two lovebirds Romeo and Juliet. They are from two different households that are enemies; Romeo is of the Montague family and Juliet is a Capulet. This makes it close to impossible for them to be together especially since Romeo killed Juliet’s cousin Tybalt whom Juliet’s parents loved very much. In the end, the couple ends up killing themselves over their “suicidal love” for each other. Over the course of the play, Romeo was supposedly in love twice. Once with Rosaline and then again of course with Juliet. At the beginning of the play he was infatuated with Rosaline and claimed that he would never get over her and…

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “The worker puts his life into the object; but now his life no longer belongs to him but to the object”. This is because the worker’s labour is invested into the object, however as he does not own the fruits of his labour, which the capitalism appropriates from him. “Labour’s product—confronts it as something alien, as a power independent of the producer” (p. 32). The more the labour produces the more he becomes estranged.…

    • 2988 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Marx and Engels wrote, "The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles," meaning that during and throughout history there is always a constant oppression between the oppressor and oppressed. Each time the fight ends in either a revolutionary reconstruction of society, including a destruction of a particular class.…

    • 528 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It begins with the view of history as a class struggle. With Karl Marx’s view of history class struggle, there are two classes in constant battle. First it was the master slave relationship, then follows peasant and nobility, on down to the bourgious and the proletarait. It was a struggle between the oppressed and the oppressor, the owner and the owned. One class exploited the other because their relationships were completely opposed. This would create a merchant class and a working class from the struggle between the peasant and the nobility. But Marx and Engles felt that at some point the working class would eliminate all the remaining classes. If there was only one class, there wouldn’t be a class struggle. There would no longer be a need for money, religion, nation-states and governments. Marx and Engels actually believed that they had discovered a method that could be applied in a scientific manner to the businesses of the world.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jessica Freeland HIS 102 Mr. Wiest March 4, 2018 Envisioning World Civilizations 23.1 Karl Marx and Friedrich Englels, "The Communist Manifesto" What was meant by "The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles. " Is that all social history shows a constant struggle between the First class and working class. The working class has always struggled to merely survive. What makes the current struggle differ from before the Bourgeoisie and Proletariat formed is that the ancient and medieval society had oppressed the slaves and the poorest plebeians and laborers.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx is the first to state that capitalism is based on the accumulation and hyper-consumption of commodities. As such, commodities are meaningful both because of their monetary/exchange value and because they reflect the social relations of production that went into making them. In The Fetishism of the Commodity, Marx says that the inherent problem with the capitalist structure is that society tends to focus only on the monetary and exchange value of the commodity. Marx uses the word “fetish” to describe commodities and show how they cause society to fixate on their monetary and exchange values, while ignoring the exploitative nature of the market that produced them. To illustrate his point, Marx uses the example of wood used by a worker to create a table. “The form of wood, for instance, is altered, by making a table out of it. Yet, for all that, the table continues to be that common, every-day thing, wood” (1). While a commodity, in this case a table, is only valuable because of the labor used to make it, it is difficult to place a specific monetary value on labor quality, so capitalist society treats commodities as if they has intrinsic value. The value of the labor is…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marx believed the factory system had resulted in a “cash economy”. Owning the means of production, the bourgeoisie kept wages low in order to get cheap supplies, improve the technology of their factories and increase their markets. According to Marx, dependency on low wages had reduced factory workers to “wage slaves,” deprived them of the satisfaction that should be found from working and made it more difficult for the lower class to provide for their basic needs. He wrote, “The work of the proletarians has lost all individual character…and all charm for the workman. He becomes an appendage of the machine.” (Paragraph 22)…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The externalization of the worker in his product means not only that his work becomes an object, an external existence, but also that it exists outside him independently, alien, an autonomous power, opposed to him. The life he has given to the object confronts him as hostile and alien” (Marx). According to Marx, the products exist independently from the laborers, and this concept can be seen in the structures of industry. The laborer does not own the product, but rather the product belongs to someone with more authority such as the owner of the company. Wolfe pours his whole life into his work, but none of the products he creates during his extensive and exhausting hours in the iron-mills belong to him.…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844 is a compilation of thoughts regarding German economic and political concerns. Karl Marx conceives capitalist society’s responsible for the estrangement of the laborer. The capitalist mode of production ensures that man’s labor necessarily restricts him from acting in accordance with his humanity. The theory of capitalism diverts him, in the sense that it provides false hope for betterment, while the structure of capitalism, in coercing him to fluctuate his priorities away from that of an autonomous social being towards that of a collective individual, debases man’s special bond to his species- what is self-contradictory is it asks him to abandon his deepest bond to humanity, while at the same time offering him the hope of becoming a better social being. As a result of this contradiction, Marx affirm, man’s labor alienates him from himself and from his species. Yet I am here to argue, although man may feel alienated from himself and product of work, man has the choice, option to free himself from notions of capital enslavement. Within this essay, I will define estrangement of labor and the four main dimensions of alienation, evident in a capitalist society. I will discuss how alienated labor comes about as a result of capitalism and why said labor is not socially commend. Furthermore, I will elucidate on what non-alienated labor would be like, compared to alienated labor, in a capitalist society. Ultimately, I will annotate why Marx’s critique of capitalism is unfound and how labor under capitalism is in fact, engaging.…

    • 1446 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Marx v. Durkheim

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Marx was a conflict theorist of the late 1800s and viewed society as characterized by tension and struggle between two groups, the bourgeoisie or the owners of production, and the proletariat or the working class. Marx believed that the bourgeoisie imposed a “false consciousness” on the proletariat, taking advantage of the working class. The relationship between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat had the former exploiting the latter, developing a theory of labor value that explained this. A worker is paid money for his labor, but Marx theorized this was never truly what the worker contributed; the more the worker could produce for less money created higher profits for the bourgeoisie. This is called the surplus value and Marx believed that the bourgeoisie will try to impose wages so that surplus value is high, giving the worker lower wages. The bourgeoisie did nothing to earn that extra money except provide the capital to produce the product (Sociology).2…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    (Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844) Marx states the worker is alienated from the product of his work. He makes it for his employer,…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In chapter eight Marx is discussing how labor creates value, where a laborer works within the capitalist labor force. When a laborer performs the tasks necessary to complete a product and add value to that product, the laborer is simply performing the roles that capitalists gave them. It creates commodities that are sold that make a profit, the basis of a capitalist system. Marx later speaks of labor preserving value, which to my understanding is his explanation of how labor is already in raw materials and the means of production helps with the creation of the end product. The laborer maintains the values of the consumed means of production, or transfers them as portions of its value to the product.…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Few philosophers viscerally strike a chord with their readers, regardless of the subject in question. Yet there is something within Marx's essay, Alienated Labor, that is able to communicate directly to working people laboring even over one-hundred and fifty years subsequent to its publication. There is good reason for this: Marx elucidated a theory of labor in which workers become subservient to the objects they produce, a theory where people are not exalted by their labor, but devalued by it. Marx's concept of alienated labor describes the internal conflict and disparity of workers, be they from the 19th or 21st century, when their existence is contingent upon fulfilling the desires and wants of another and neglecting their own.…

    • 586 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal Farm

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Animal Farm - Karl Marx Is based on the work of the German Philosopher Karl Marx Karl Marx was a German Philospher Ms F Grech - Form 3 “The worker becomes all the poorer the more wealth he produces, the more his production increases in power and range...” 1 Animal Farm - Karl Marx “The worker becomes an ever cheaper commodity the more commodities he creates...” What does this mean?…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays