In terms of the layout for the Daily Nation newspaper, the article is broken up in long paragraphs. However, The Standard’s article is broken up in sections of sub-headings …show more content…
Yet, for The Standard’s article, it contained simple and easy to read words/language. Concerning the length of the sentences for The Daily Nation, They are pretty average, although most of the are long. The word length of The Daily Nation is average, but like I stated before, the language in The Daily Nation was very mature and complex, so you need to be highly educated in order to understand. On the other hand, The Standard’s article had long sentences, but the word length was between short and average length.
The use of technical jargon in The Daily Nation were very few, however, the use of technical jargon in The Standard were none. In addition to the type of language, the emotion that The Daily Nation used when reading the article was very serious, formal and emotive. The Standard however, even though the article was formal, it was …show more content…
The article does some bias in the heading but the view is generally balanced. The Standard’s article on the contrary, is biased. The headline and the contents of the article both point to the fact. The Standard’s article makes me feel sympathy for Tunoi.
In the terms of who got interviewed for The Daily Nation’s article and why includes Justice Tunoi to defend and plead his innocence and to give his side of the story and Geoffrey Kiplagat to accuse Tunoi of bribery. The Standard’s article interviewed Justice Tunoi and Geoffrey Kiplagat for the same reasons, but one more person that The Standard interviewed was Chief Justice Willy Mutunga in order to ensure the public that he was, in fact looking for a new team of judges to replace the former.
When it comes to The Daily Nation’s article having a specific message, the article doesn’t have a specific/particular message because it was written just to inform people of what was going on in court and to give the people enough information for them to decide for themselves if Tunoi was innocent or not. This is completely different from The Standard’s article because it actually has a particular message which is to not get involved with bribery, inform the people what happens in court and how you can defend yourself if ever caught in the