Preview

Judicial Review In Supreme Court History

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
473 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Judicial Review In Supreme Court History
One of the primary foundations for the power which it exercises over the American judicial system is the basics of judicial review. This power consists of the ability of the Supreme Court to decide upon “review” that a piece of some form of Government action is not permitted under the Constitution and can be deemed “unconstitutional”. The Supreme Court established this idea early in its existence and was empowered as a vital institution in the American Government primarily by exercising it. Judicial review is controversial because an unelected group is charged with interpreting the Constitution and the validity of laws affecting the population. Judicial review should be void of all political favoring, however, the power granted to a body that is not accountable to the public can be seen as an imbalance in the checks and balances intended by the three branch system of democracy in the United States. …show more content…
Madison arguably serves as the most important case in Supreme Court history, was the first U.S. Supreme Court case to apply the principle of "judicial review". A very common example of judicial review example derives from the Plessy vs Ferguson case. Having been arrested and convicted for violating the law requiring “Blacks” to ride in separate train cars, Homer Plessey appealed to the Supreme Court, stating the “Jim Crow” laws violated his 14th Amendment right to receive “equal protection under the law.” During the judicial review, the state argued that Plessey and other Blacks were receiving equal treatment, but

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Marbury v. Madison:(1803) Judicial review In 1801, Justice William Marbury was to have received a commission from President Adams, but Secretary of State James Madison refused to issue the commission. Chief Justice Marshall stated that the Judiciary Act of 1789, which was the basis for Marbury's claim, conflicted with Article III of the Constitution. Marbury did not receive the commission. This case determined that the Supreme Court and not the states would have the ultimate word on whether an issue was in violation of the Constitution. The ruling, based on judicial review, made the Judicial Branch equal to the other two branches of government.…

    • 2027 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Framers of the United States Constitution vested immense power in the judicial branch of the government. Over the years, the highest Court of the land, the United States Supreme Court, has ruled on a multitude of cases, making new laws and setting precedence. The American people deem the judicial body supreme and, perhaps irrationally, trust they will interpret the Constitution more accurately and ethically compared to the executive and legislative branches. However, decisions of the courts are not purely legal, but rather a synthesis of attitudinal, legal, and strategic processes.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Judicial Independence Within a Political Process. Our judicial branch of government was designed not only to serve as a check on the power of the executive and legislative branches but also to be the final arbiter on disputes among states and between the states and the federal government. One important arbitration tool utilized by the judicial branch is judicial review. Judicial review is one of the U.S. Constitution’s most provocative features as it plays an important role in shaping the laws that impact our society. For this discussion, complete the following:…

    • 55625 Words
    • 161 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the days of Chief Justice John Marshall, The Supreme Court has been the arbiter of constitutionality among the three branches of government. Through this judicial review, The Supreme Court has become the bastion of The Constitution. In the current case of Zivotofsky v. Kerry, the very checks and balances that hold the triarchy of American government stable are bearing inspection. Fomented in a small passage of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act in 2002 with, “for purposes of the registration of birth, certification of nationality, or issuance of a passport of a United States citizen born in the city of Jerusalem, the Secretary shall, upon the request of the citizen or the citizen’s legal guardian, record the place of birth as Israel”…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Plessy vs. Ferguson case happened in 1892 and was about a man named Homer Plessy who was an octoroon. He bought a ticket and sat in a whites only railroad car. This happened two years after a law called the Separate Car Act was put into effect. He was arrested for violating it but didn't want to face the penalty of it which was a fine of $25 or 20 days in jail so he went to court($25 in 1892 inflates to $657.89 today). He argued that it violated the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution. He lost twice in the lower courts, then decided to take it all the way to the Supreme Court. In a 7-1 decision, the Supreme Court ruled against Plessy and rejected his Amendment…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury v. Madison is a court case that was decided by the United States Supreme Court in 1803 involving William Marbury as the Plaintiff and James Madison as the Defendant (History.com staff, 2009). As a result of this case, the United States Supreme Court was granted the power to perform judicial review (“Judicial Review”, n.d.). With the power of judicial review, the United States Supreme Court is now permitted to review laws from the legislature and executive orders from the President to determine their constitutionality.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Federal Court System contains three levels of courts: first, U.S district courts and various courts of limited jurisdiction (trial courts of general jurisdiction). Second, U.S courts of appeals (intermediate courts of appeals). Finally, the highest level of the three level federal court system is the United State Supreme Court. Today, the United State Supreme Court is located in Washington D.C.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    views as to whether or not Judicial review, and the Supreme Court as a whole,…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nowadays, the most diffused constitutional models of judicial review are the American and the European. Both these Constitutional models should be the manifestos of democracy and sovereignty of the people, but it is easily to deny this statement. In fact, we have to take into account that constitutions can be also negative for the consolidation of democracy. For instance, in many cases the authoritarian regimes use the constitution as support for them. Although, a democratic system would be against a certain type of judicial independence since democracies promote a popular participation, judicial review represents a fundamental organ for the protection of human rights and civil liberties.…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1. A recent article in Public Law asks whether judicial review of legislation is undemocratic.1 In some jurisdictions the question has come to dominate public-law theory. Constitutional scholarship in the USA, for example, seems obsessed by questions about the legitimacy of judicial review, often assessed by reference to democratic theory2 but also in relation to techniques of constitutional interpretation.…

    • 5008 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    government essay

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The power of judicial review was never formally delegated either by the Constitution or an Act of Congress, but arose from British common law practices the US Courts adopted as a matter of course. Chief Justice John Marshall formally claimed the right of judicial review in his opinion for the Marbury v. Madison, (1803) case. Even though when the legislative, executive, and judicial branched was set up they wanted to give each branch equal power, judicial still seems to have a little bit more than the others. Even though the power to declare laws unconstitutional is not in equal power, it needs to be done. If the Supreme Court didn't who would? Without the power to rule laws unconstitutional who knows what kind of laws would stay in effect. The Court plays an important role in our nation's systems of checks and balances. Without separation of powers and an independent judiciary within a tripartite government, the nation's citizens are at greater risk of tyranny from either or both of the other branches. The Founding Fathers recognized this danger and deliberately fashioned a system of government that, while far from perfect, comes closer to ensuring personal liberty than most other political models. Of our three branches of government - Executive, Legislative, and Judicial - the judiciary is the weakest. It has no power to create new legislation, nor does it have the means of directly enforcing its mandates. Those are two limitations written into our Constitution that prevent the Supreme Court from wielding too much power. Likewise, our system of government provides a means for preventing the President and Congress from becoming despotic, passing and enforcing laws that infringe the rights of its…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The power of courts of law to review the actions of the executive and legislative branches is called judicial review. Though judicial review is usually associated with the U.S. Supreme Court, which has ultimate judicial authority, it is a power possessed by most federal and state courts of law in the United States. The concept is an American invention. Prior to the early 1800s, no country in the world gave its judicial branch such authority.…

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The conventional usage of the term judicial review could be more accurately described as “constitutional review,” because there also exists a long practice neither of judicial review of the actions of administrative agencies that require neither that courts have the power to declare those actions unconstitutional nor that the country have a written constitution. Such “administrative review” assesses the allegedly questionable actions of administrators against standards of reasonableness and abuse of discretion. When courts judge challenged administrative actions to be unreasonable or to involve abuses of discretion, those actions are declared null and void, as are actions that are judged inconsistent with constitutional requirements when courts exercise judicial review in the conventional or the constitutional sense.…

    • 8497 Words
    • 34 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Judicial Review

    • 5261 Words
    • 22 Pages

    Below we lay out the minimum of information you will need to know regarding each of these grounds for JR.…

    • 5261 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Role and Functions of Law

    • 778 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Patrick, J., J., ed, (2001). Judicial review, The Oxford guide to the United States government. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978019514273-0.…

    • 778 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays