Singson, Matthew
Vielmas, Bianca
English 10H, III
October 29,2014
Julius Caesar Antony’s Speech
The great Julius Caesar lies dead, and Marc Antony attempts to turn the crowd against his killers, who previously had won the support of the people. In Act III, scene II of the play Julius Caesar by William
Shakespeare, Marc Antony uses his skills as an orator to manipulate the crowd against the conspirators. Antony first gains the crowd’s trust, then casts doubt on the conspirators’ motives, and finally inspiring them to act against Brutus and the others. By the end of the speech, the people are out for blood.
In this manipulative speech, Antony appeals to the crowd to defend Caesar’s virtue, not to praise him, as he says so himself. Antony begins his speech with a list of three words: “Friends, Romans,
Countrymen.” This is comparable to Brutus’ beginning of “Romans, Countrymen and lovers.” Antony imitated Brutus’ introduction, but rearranged the order and changed “lovers” to “friends.” He attempts to side himself with the people by using the word “Friends” to gain more support. Going before Antony, Brutus had successfully won the support and respect of the crowd. He brainwashed them into thinking he was right, even though he did not have any proof to back him up. Antony begins his speech appearing to side with the conspirators’ actions. By not openly challenging Brutus, he encourages the crowd to listen to him speak. Later in his speech, Antony describes himself as “No orator, as Brutus is;/ But (as you all know me) a plain blunt man/ That love my friend,” in a further bid to gain his audience’s trust. By describing himself as just another Roman, not an orator, Antony’s relationship with the crowd becomes more personal and less manipulative.
Once Antony feels that he has gained some credibility with the crowd, Antony begins to subtly cast doubt on the conspirators’ motives. First he repeatedly refers to Brutus and the conspirators as noble and honorable men. With each repetition, he causes the crowd to question whether the conspirators truly are honorable men. At the same time, Antony proves that Caesar was not ambitious by reminding the crowd that Caesar gave ransom money to the public fund, wept with the poor, and three time refused the crown. He reminds the crowd that they all once had a reason to love Caesar, and demonstrates the claim of his ambition is unfounded. Throughout this part of his speech, Antony repeats the question “Was this ambition,” and reminds the crowd “Brutus says he was ambitious.” He also reminds the crowd “Brutus is an honorable man.” Instead of simply telling the crowd, he leaves it for them to realize that Brutus’ claims were far from the truth, and question how honorable the conspirators really were. To the crowd, the conspirators appear to act less for the good of Rome and more for their own purposes. By the time Antony pauses, the crowd is on his side, one plebeian even fearing that a worse ruler would replace Caesar.
Ironically, Antony appears to attempt to keep the crowd at peace in lines 122-125, and claims that he is simply obeying Cassius and Brutus while secretly working against them. Throughout his speech, he
Lopez, Katarina
Singson, Matthew
Vielmas, Bianca
English 10H, III
October 29,2014 has been stirring the crowds to action. First, he reminds them of their love for Caesar, and implores them to mourn the dead ruler. Later he suggests to the crowd to mutiny against the conspirators to avenge the great Caesar’s death. He arouses the crowd’s sympathy for Caesar in line 182 by comparing Brutus to an angel, well beloved by the ruler. This makes Brutus’ attack appear as a heartless and cruel attack on the benevolent Caesar. Brutus’ betrayal further strengthens the hatred for the conspirators that Antony had sought in showing Caesar’s body. Pointing out each wound, in addition to Brutus’, makes each conspirator personally responsible for their role in Caesar’s death.
This incites an immediate reaction from the crowds; one plebeian calling the conspirators traitors and villains, while another demands revenge. Caesar’s wounds, as Antony explains, cannot tell his side of the story, drawing more support from the crowd. To the people, Caesar was struck down in cold blood, and under false pretenses. The conspirators’ fate was sealed when Antony read Caesar’s will to the crowd. Caesar’s generous bequeathments to the people confirmed that Caesar was a kind, benevolent ruler, and the conspirators have wronged Rome in killing him.
The conspirator’s did wrong in trusting the skilled orator Antony, their actions leading to mutiny among the people instead of order. Antony’s oration proved to be more effective than Brutus’ as he won over the crowd by using methods of rhetoric, persuasion, and sarcasm. Antony achieves the support of the people, having caused them to start riots and wanting to doom the conspirators.
Shakespeare has written an appealing scene where the support and the respect of the people was constantly swinging between the noble Brutus and Antony.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Antony may have turned the crowd against Brutus in the end, but only had the…
- 581 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Communication is an important aspect of a business. Having an effective communication system in place will improve the overall relationship with the employees, clients and vendors. Businesses need to stay on top of current trends of communication to ensure that they are at the forefront of the business community.…
- 594 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Antony understood the audience very well and knew they would consider any other viewpoint on any topic. He realized that using his emotions would be the most beneficial way to persuade. He was able to use ethos by stating how Caesar was not too ambitious to have his life taken away from him (III,ii,94-99). Antony used pathos by having a visual, emotional impact on the people. He lifted up his cloak, showing the wounds, and telling where each conspirator had the power and the evil motivation to kill this worthy man…
- 538 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Soon after the last breaths of one of Rome’s most popular general, Julius Caesar, Antony and Brutus were speaking in front of the people of Rome. Both cunning leaders were nimble in the art of persuasion and manipulation. The beloved leaders used the Ethos, Pathos, and Logos methods of persuasion to sway the crowd to his respective view of the actions of the night and their former general Julius Caesar.…
- 419 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
As a tragic hero Brutus possesses a flaw of naivety. Brutus is too trusting in others, such as the conspirators. The conspirators believed that Caesar was too ambitious and that they should kill him for the good of Rome, themselves and for their own personal benefit. Brutus trusted that they were conspiring to kill him for the sake of Rome. (Quote). He was also naïve by letting Antony speak at Caesar’s funeral. Brutus believed that Antony would praise Caesar at his funeral and follow the rules that he was given. Brutus trusted him and by letting him speak Antony turned all the Romans against him. Antony sparked a civil war by convincing the Romans that the conspirators that they did wrong. Since Antony turned all the Romans against him, he…
- 161 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
He illuminated their worries and played into to their weak minds. His gift of rhetorics is able to seduce every man in the city into killing the conspirators; and they do kill the conspirators. Antony states that they are all honorable Romans, and the Romans think Antony respects them. In reality he wants the conspirators dead, and uses the Romans to do so. As a leader in our society today Antony would be able to get rid of the untrustworthy leaders and keep order, law, and loyalty in our government. He would also be able to invoke a healthy sense of fear into the hearts on our citizens, fear that is not currently present.…
- 418 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Julius Caesar’s Mark Antony prevails as the master of persuasion through language. In a eulogy speech for the recently deceased Caesar, he expertly employs repetition, reverse psychology, and flattery to manipulate the minds and hearts of his audience.…
- 613 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Antony says some keywords, to make the crowd to believe that he loved him as much as they did. “My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar, and I must pause till it come back to me.” Antony also repeats words to indicate to the crowd that he is sarcastic. “For Brutus says he is ambitious, and Brutus is an honourable man.” Antony uses specific words to turn the crowd onto his side.…
- 565 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Initially, Antony uses Ethos to establish himself as a trusted and loyal figure to gain respect and trust of the plebeians. To gain the citizens’ attention, Antony begins Caesar’s funeral speech by reassuring them that he only “[came] to bury Caesar, not [to praise] him” (3.2.83). By only intending to bury Caesar, Antony convinces the audience to listen to his words because they are spoken with bitterness toward Caesar. With Antony in agreement with their newly instilled anger, the plebeians begin to trust Antony’s words even though his bitterness was not…
- 1022 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, Decius Brutus and Mark Antony, both Roman Senators, eulogize Julius Caesar, each using a different technique and approach. Brutus, in a somewhat arrogant, to the point, eulogy, attempts to sway the people. He justifies conspiring against Caesar by stating that Caesar's ambition would have hurt Rome. However, in Antony's eulogy, he focuses on Caesar's positive traits, and cunningly disproves Brutus' justification for killing Caesar. The fickle Romans waver between leaders, responding emotionally, rather than intellectually, to the orators.<br><br>Brutus seeks to explain why he conspired against Caesar. He begins his speech with "Romans, countrymen ...", appealing to their consciousness as citizens of Rome, who,…
- 844 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Antony loved Caesar and was completely against his murder, so he used rhetorical strategies to persuade the Romans to be against the perpetrators. For example when Antony says “Yet Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man” he is using the mix of sarcasm and logos. Antony repeats this same thing over and over again until the Romans start questioning if Brutus truly is an honorable man. His sarcasm and repetition were both great rhetorical tactics that were used to manipulate and confuse the Roman’s minds. Antony brings together the perfect amount of ethos and pathos when he states, “ ‘Tis his will. Let but the commons hear this testament- which pardon me, I do not mean to read- And they would go and kiss dead Caesar’s wounds And dip their napkins in his sacred blood,” (III,ii,127-132). This is essential because it shows that Antony is credible and trustworthy because he has Caesar’s will. This also appeals to the people’s emotions because they become saddened over Caesar’s death. Antony used his tactics to make the Romans trust him and his views, which led to them rioting against the perpetrators. His use of ethos, pathos, and logos convinced the people that the assassination of Caesar was a cruel act and that Brutus, Cassius, and the other perpetrators are…
- 940 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Before his speech begins, the whole crowd is going wild with overwhelming support for Brutus. Knowing this, Antony is quickly able to capture the attention of the people by saying, “For Brutus’ sake, I am beholding to you” (64). By starting off with saying that Brutus endorses whatever Antony is able to say, they are suddenly more curious to hear what he say and what exactly their beloved Brutus approves of. By saying this, Antony is able to borrow Brutus’ honest reputation and use it as his own. Towards the end of his speech, Antony borrows Caesar’s renewed ethos, once again merging voices and giving Antony even more credibility. He asks the audience, “Wherein hath Caesar thus deserved your love?” (234). Antony successfully borrows Caesar’s great reputation and increases his credibility for the people to trust him.…
- 684 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Shakespeare’s tragedy Julius Caesar clearly presents conflicting perspectives of the assassination of Caesar, a powerful and respected leader, viewed by the conspirators as overly ambitious, but by Marc Antony as a loyal servant of Rome. Brutus and the conspirators believe that Caesar’s death is necessary in retaining democracy, whereas Antony regards the act as brutal murder.…
- 1236 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In Shakespeare’s interpretation of Julius Caesar’s assassination titled, Julius Caesar, a man named Cassius is attempting to get the help and alliance of a fellow Roman named Brutus in the conspiracy of assassinating the Roman leader. He accomplishes this in constructed and detailed monologues to persuade Brutus to join the conspiracy. In each of Cassius’ monologues, Cassius strategically uses appeals and rhetorical devices to ultimately give a successful and persuasive speech to his audience, Brutus.…
- 895 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
subtly infer they were to blame and swayed the romans against them. Brutus was naïve in letting…
- 1231 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays