Preview

Julius Caesar Brutus Comparison

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
574 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Julius Caesar Brutus Comparison
A person’s personality is what characterizes them. It expresses who you are and how you carry yourself. Edwin van Thiel states that,”A personality is something that you always take with you, it affects your thinking, feelings and behavior, where and with whom you are, in any situation at any time”. In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Brutus and Cassius are two characters that stand out. In several ways they are similar to or different from each other.These ways are presented in both their actions and words. The likeness and disparity in their morals, motivation, and decisions show. In William Shakespeare’s book, Brutus and Cassius and have two different personalities, and it is shown throughout the book.
Morally, Brutus and Cassius could not be more different. They have two individual personalities and their motives are distinct between each other. Brutus is a more naive, dominant and noble character and has a strong and sincere personality. Cassius is a more submissive and manipulative person with a cold and dark personality. Taylor states, “Cassius has the Biblical "wisdom of the serpent." (308). He states this, because Cassius is not trustworthy and is perceived as selfish. Cassius has a mean and cruel way of thinking. Basically, their personalities are what define them and it affects
…show more content…
Their personalities is what differentiates them and make them stand out. They both have different stances on why they want to kill Caesar. Even through all the differences they still have some similarities between them, like their courageousness and being fearless. Like Brutus we can all relate to being persuaded or tricked into doing something bad. Cassius persuaded him to join the Conspiracy so that they could kill Caesar. At the end they both fell at their own swords, so the moral of this story is don't be arrogant and think you’re above anyone

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Julius Caesar and JFK are similar in many ways. Julius Caesar was a Noble Military Leader of Rome, and John F. Kennedy was the 35TH President of The United States. Both Were Looked Up to and both, The People were very affected By both Assassinations.…

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Protagonists keep the plot of a story going, they are the ones we cling to and hope to see win in the end or die trying. In the outstanding play Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, many characters play a very important role while many others are there simply to die. But the question still remains. Who exactly is the main character? Julius Caesar or noble Brutus? Both show the great acts of a protagonist, along with being the main eye throughout the story which would prove them to be the best choice for the role. They both flow through the story like hot butter, but not all butter lands on toast.…

    • 237 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cassius's perspective is very much that Caesar is a mere man and no better than any other Roman. 'I was born as free as Caesar, so were you.' His recollection of the time he saved Caesar from drowning had a great influence on his view on Caesar, “Tis true, this god did shake.” He ironically utilizes the term ‘god’ as he was astonished that a man of such physical weakness can now have the reputation of greatness, “'Ye gods, it doth amaze me / A man of such a feeble temper should / So get the start of the majestic world.” Cassius’ soliloquy exposes his deceit and manipulation, “Well, Brutus, thou art noble; yet I see Thy honourable metal may be wrought from that it is disposed.” His play on words showing his belief that he will be able to manipulate Brutus; honourable “mettle,” as if it were heated metal being changed into something new and finally target Caesar with his own loved companion. There is an element of personal jealousy in Cassius. It is evident in his metaphorical language:, 'Why, man, he doth bestride the narrow world / Like a Colossus and we petty men' His simile of ‘Colossus’ also produces imagery of the flawed Caesar. Cassius represents Caesar as a tyrant. Cassius takes it personally and will act on the matter. Therefore, through a variety of literary techniques, embedded in various character convictions and opposing views, Shakespeare is able to blur…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Was Julius Caesar Bad

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As far as military strategy goes Cassius had the better brain for it. Brutus was not a very good military strategist. Cassius knew that it would be a good idea to kill Antony. He thought that Antony would talk the people into trying to kill Brutus and…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What Is Brutus Like Caesar

    • 2042 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Does Marcus Brutus like Caesar? What does Brutus think of Caesar’s rise to power? .…

    • 2042 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jealousy In Julius Caesar

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The character Cassius in the tragedy of Julius Caesar by Shakespeare constantly reflects palpable jealousy. In Act I Scene II, Cassius claims “I was born free as Caesar; so were you:/We both have fed as well, and we both/Endure the winter’s cold as well as he…”(Shakespeare, lines 5-7); and feels king Caesar does not deserve superiority over him. In this scene, Cassius is pointing out to Brutus that he and Cassius deserve the power to lead Rome more than Caesar. In order to prove these points, Cassius shares three stories with Brutus in his speech: one of when he and Caesar had a swimming contest; another when he saw Caesar sickly and frail after a fever; and lastly one where Caesar again is portrayed as a weak and sickly man. In the monologue by Cassius directed at Brutus, Cassius uses paradox, self-heroic word choice and similes throughout three separate stories to give examples of Caesar’s weaknesses. Cassius’ main goal becomes to portray Caesar as any other man; and to rationalize killing the king to gain power for (what he…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marcus Brutus’ plight is ultimately a decision to save a republic that involves sacrificing its soon-to-be dictatorial leader, with the conspiracy taking into consideration the pros and the cons of such an act. Often times the better choice is the more difficult one, especially when it involves the murder of a man beloved by all. As such, Brutus is the tragic hero of the play Julius Caesar. His tragic flaw is his easily trusting nature, and his conflicting emotions and nobleness make him one of the most renowned tragic heroes of all time.…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Next, and above all else, is the difference between their view on honor. Brutus is one of, if not the most, honorable characters in Julius Caesar. He states that “I love the name of honor more than I fear death.” In comparison to Brutus’ honorable ways, Cassius is somewhat devious and deceitful. This is shown early on in the plot when he orders Cinna to deliver fake letters supposedly written by citizens to Brutus proclaiming their love for him, along with their desire for him to kill Caesar and take his…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his second monologue, Cassius focuses on pathos and logos in order to appeal to his audience, Brutus, directly. Cassius smartly avoids further development of ethos in this monologue to make sure Brutus doesn’t think this is all personal for Cassius and deter him from the conspiracy. Therefore, as mentioned before, Cassius’ intent for his second monologue is to appeal to Brutus. He wants to raise Brutus to the same level as Caesar and make him see that he is just as important in I.ii.9-15. This makes Brutus feel good about himself, and successfully makes Cassius’ arguments against Caesar more personal to Brutus and slowly pulls him into the conspiracy. Cassius could’ve used anyone’s name in his explanation that the name is equal to Caesar, but the fact that he used Brutus’ name made his pathos much stronger and directed at the audience for greater persuasion. This is where Cassius strongly considers his audience and knows that by implementing them into the argument he will have a higher chance at success. When Cassius then shifts into appeal to logos, he explains that Caesar, one man, is taking up all the fame and glory of Rome when there is room for much more than just one single, not even god-like man (I.ii.18-25). He explains once again just like he did in the concluding sentence of his first paragraph that it does not make sense that one man receive all the power and “bear the palm alone” (I.ii.43) He dives into the values of his audience and the people of that time who valued democracy, equality and even a divvied up triumvirate of three leaders who ruled Rome simultaneously in a checks and balances sort of way to avoid absolute leadership like the one Caesar is holding. Brutus of course would agree that, yes, why should a single man rule when the people or Rome and its government is based on a triumvirate with democratic…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The exposition of Julius Caesar, Shakespeare immediately presents the ideals that underpin the differing views of Caesar’s rising power through his two protagonists, Brutus and Cassius. Both characters posses different interpretations on Caesar’s reign on Rome, one being loyal to Rome and a love and respect for Caesar “I love him well” but the other being a spiteful and vitriolic towards a “feeble old tyrant.” This highlights the notion of Cassius’s selfish prejudice towards his own contentment, which is only shown behind closed doors. Brutus on the other hand is victim to Cassius’ vitriol and becomes the pawn as he is manipulated “poor Brutus, with himself at war,” Brutus is troubled emotionally, torn by his patriotism and his respect for Caesar, above all he has an undying love for Rome, “Brutus had rather be a villager than to repute himself a son of Rome.” It is this love for Rome that causes such internal turmoil for Brutus, through Shakespeare’s use of juxtaposition of characters, he is able to highlight to the audience, the lengths that man will go to in order to…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brutus Tragic Hero

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Being a tragic hero, Brutus has one major flaw; Brutus is too easily swayed to believe what others say or think. Cassius writes notes in different handwritings to try to get Brutus to join the conspiracy and dethrone Caesar. “All tending to the great opinion / that Rome holds of his name, wherein obscurely / Caesar’s ambition shall be glanced at”…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roman Empire and Brutus

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Brutus is a patriotic middle aged man, who truly cares about the well being of his fellow people. “I do fear, the people, Choose Caesar for their king,” says Brutus. (Act 1 scene 2, 80) Despite Brutus’ friendship with Caesar, he much rather prefers Rome to remain a republic. He puts the masses before his own friendship. Brutus in return, is seen as trustworthy and reliable by the people. Indeed, Brutus is a noble man. Brutus says, “For let the gods so speed me as I love, the name of honor more than I fear death.” (act 1 scene 2, 90) He values honesty, fairness and balance. He is willing to lay his own life for what he believes. He is passionate and will do as much as what is needed so that what he believes is right will shine through. Brutus is easily swayed by Cassius in Act 1 scene 2. “Brutus and Caesar—what should be in that “Caesar”?” says the sly Cassius. (Act 2 scene 2, 140) After Cassius’ speech, Brutus considers the proposition of plotting against Caesar and does not shun the idea at all. Brutus is so willing to believe in his worthiness and Cassius’ call for action. He fails to truly listen to the Romans because he is too engrossed in doing what he believes is best for them.…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brutus want to march his army to Philippi to face the triumvirate's army at Philippi, while Cassius want Brutus to let his troop stay input and wait for the triumvirate's army to come. Brutus won the argument, so Cassius have to give in with Brutus's plan.…

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death of a Salesman

    • 1606 Words
    • 7 Pages

    When it comes to families, all ours are different and what separates our family from the next person is the way we act toward each other. What makes a tight family is how they can communicate with each other, not putting one person over the other and treating everyone just as equal. However in”Death of a Salesman’’ by Arthur Miller, the Loman family was pure an example of a dysfunctional family. They were a family who fed off lies, dreams of success, and phony relationships. Arthur wanted to send the message of how there’s a difference between working hard for success and finding the “in’s and out’s”, the way Willy believes. He might want to take advice about success from Booker T. Washington who said” success is to be measured not so much by the position that one has reached in life as by the obstacles which he has overcome.” Arthur Miller shows with Happy, Willy, and Biff that success is not only seen as a goal but also as a weakness. Each character plays a big role on why the family is so dysfunctional; the only character who seems normal was the mother. The relationship Willy had with his boys was night a day between Biff and Happy. However his “golden child” wasn’t so much a “golden child”.…

    • 1606 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil Disobedience Impact

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Civil disobedience is a courageous way to show a free society that you disagree with a law and yet still accept its consequences. The attentions these acts receive put the spotlight on the laws and cause others to question them. It highlights unjust laws and calls for their dismissal or change within the scope of law. It encourages people to stand up for their beliefs while remaining accountable for their actions. Civil disobedience positively impacts free societies by laying down the first bricks of change.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays