No, not an oath. If not the face of men, The sufferance of our souls, the time’s abuse- If these be motives weak, break off betimes, And every man hence to his idle bed. (2.1.125-128)
By refusing swearing an oath Brutus shows his idealistic personality even if that totally goes against his believes what is honorable for Rome. This conflict between Brutus and Cassius shows their points of views of being realistic in Cassius’s case and idealistic in Brutus’s. Shakespeare’s next example of realism v idealism in the play is when Cassius offers to kill Mark Antony, Caesar’s loyal follower. According to Cassius, “I think it is not meet/ Mark Antony, so well beloved of Caesar, /Should outlive Caesar” (2.1.168-170). Cassius’s realistic point of view shows that Mark Antony can be dangerous for the conspiracy and future events. Cassius is worried of Antony because after killing Caesar; Antony might rise to power and become the new king of Rome. On the other hand, Brutus continues to stay idealistic. Brutus thinks that “Our course will seem too bloody, Caius Cassius, / To cut the head off and then hack the limbs, / Like wrath in death and envy afterwards” (2.1.175-177). Brutus believes that killing Caesar and Antony will not gain approval from people of Rome and will not be seen as honorable act. Therefore, conspirators take Brutus’s point of view and he leads them to noble act to finish the king. After all conspirators have followed Brutus’s idealistic decision and have killed Caesar; Brutus makes another idealistic mistake by letting Mark Antony speak at Caesar’s funeral. After killing Caesar, Brutus talks to Antony about joining him. Antony agrees to be Brutus’s loyal follower as he used to be for Caesar, but he wants to give a funeral speech in honor of Caesar. Cassius with his realistic point of view thinks that it is a bad idea to let Mark Antony give speech at Caesar’s funeral. Cassius tells Brutus, You know not what you do. Do not consent That Antony speak in his funeral. Know you how much the people may be moved By that which he will utter? (3.1.255-259)
Cassius’s realism leads him to believe that Antony’s speech can be dangerous and people of Rome may reconsider to follow Brutus and other conspirators. Brutus idealism trusts Mark Antony’s choice and allows him to speak at Caesar’s funeral; however, with several agreements. Brutus says: “You shall not in your funeral speech blame us/ But speak all good you can devise of Caesar/ And say you do ‘t by our permission” (3.1.270-272). Brutus wants Antony to speak only about Caesar but not about what the conspirators have done to him. Also, Brutus idealism blinds him to realize that the crowd may shift to favor Antony’s side. Mark Antony’s speech gets the people of Rome to choose his side and to turn they fury toward all conspirators, whom they kill. Brutus and Cassius, kept alive but forced to leave Rome. William Shakespeare creates Brutus as an idealistic tragic hero in the play of Julius Caesar to show people that a tragic flaw can grow to a downfall. An honorable Roman man Brutus have done many idealistic mistakes throughout his life. He refused to swear an oath, was against killing Antony, and finally let Antony speak on Caesar’s funeral. Brutus’s idealistic thinking and these situations make his life a tragic flaw that led to a downfall. Hence, William Shakespeare’s message is being more realistic in life decisions, and he wants people to be honorable but not to be idealistic at the same time.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
1.Why do Octavius and Mark Antony want to engage in a battle with Brutus and Cassius?…
- 494 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
power. The plan did not work because they did not get along and soon lived…
- 1008 Words
- 4 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The Republican period of Roman history began in 509 BCE after the last Etruscan kings was dropped. The Republic was controlled by the Senate, which was an assembly by dominated upper-class families. This dominance by the aristocracy led to tensions between the social classes, especially among the lower classes who fought for equality in both the economy and the government. Despite these inner struggles, Rome's military power strengthened throughout the 5th and 4th centuries BCE and by 270 BCE they commanded the entire peninsula. 264 BCE brought the beginning of the three Punic Wars fought against Carthage over control of the western Mediterranean. These resulted in victories for Rome which granted them access to the wealth of Greece, Egypt,…
- 803 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Though the Northern & Southern colonies were close to each other, they held many similarities and differences. America was a place of dreams until immigrants began sailing to its’ shores. An influx of immigrants came to America in the 17th century were English, but there were also Dutch, Swedes and Germans in the middle region, a few French Huguenots in South Carolina and elsewhere, slaves from Africa, mainly in the South, and a scattering of Spaniards, Italians and Portuguese all through the colonies. They had sailed and sought after religious freedom, economic growth and better government.…
- 403 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
devices in order to persuade Brutus, a senator and friend of Caesar, that Caesar is…
- 488 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
All texts are deliberately constructed to convey an agenda and a set of values. This means that every composer has a purpose, which is based on the issues arising from their context and audience. To that end, the composer uses conflicting perspectives as a vehicle for successfully conveying their purpose to the audience. So, through the representation of events, personalities and situations (which utilises form, language and structural devices), the responder is positioned to accept the perspective that the composer has represented as valid or credible. As a consequence, the composer is able to successfully impart their values to the audience. Examples of conflicting perspectives in society and the media come in the form of William Shakespeare’s…
- 987 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
A highly-regarded politician and conspirator in ancient Rome, Brutus, in his funerary speech to Julius Caesar, effectively claims that the conspiracy killing of Caesar is justified. First, he supports this claim by asserting that if Caesar was still alive, he would eventually force the people of Rome to act like his slaves, like a true dictator. Brutus uses a rhetorical question to appeal to logos when stating, “Had you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men? (Shakespeare). This rhetorical question makes the audience think about how their lives would be if Caesar would continue to powerfully reign. Brutus compares them to the slaves of Caesar that work under his authority until death,…
- 512 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Rhetorical devices enhance a speaker’s argument by making the reader or listener question and think about the topic more thoroughly. In Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Mark Antony’s funeral speech for Caesar persuaded the audience more effectively than Brutus’ speech because of his use of rhetorical devices such as logos, aposiopesis, anaphora.…
- 649 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
As the only priestesshood involved with the College Pontiffs, the Vestal Virgins had close contact with the emperor and influence in the politics of Rome. The Pontiff Order had complete control of the state’s religion, thus acting as the as the emperor’s religious council and assisting him in all religious affairs. This role in Rome’s monarchy came with immense power and a high position of status. It was not until 104 B.C.E. that the Pontifex Maximus began to be an elected position; before this change, a pontiff was appointed membership. In 63 B.C.E. Julius Caesar was elected Pontifex Maximus – a position that was then held by every emperor thereafter (Lendering livius.org). For example, in an attempt to boost the moral standing and stress the importance of religion in Roman society, the pious emperor Agustus, the adopted son of Julius…
- 528 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Marcus Brutus’ plight is ultimately a decision to save a republic that involves sacrificing its soon-to-be dictatorial leader, with the conspiracy taking into consideration the pros and the cons of such an act. Often times the better choice is the more difficult one, especially when it involves the murder of a man beloved by all. As such, Brutus is the tragic hero of the play Julius Caesar. His tragic flaw is his easily trusting nature, and his conflicting emotions and nobleness make him one of the most renowned tragic heroes of all time.…
- 831 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Gaius Julius Caesar lived from 100- 44 BC and was a prominent person in the last few decades of the Roman Empire. He was skilled as a speaker and writer, an intelligent politician and fantastic general, but he was also very brutal in his chase of selfish goals. These goals were not only having complete power over the Roman republic, but also credit as being a god. Caesar was born in 102 or 100 BCE into the ancient patrician family of the Iulii who claimed ancestry from Aeneas of Troy, one of the mythical founders of Rome, and the goddess Venus, but few members of the family had distinguished themselves in the previous generations. Caesar's father arrived at the praetor-ship, but never won the election for the consulship. The years of his youth…
- 2140 Words
- 9 Pages
Better Essays -
In his second monologue, Cassius focuses on pathos and logos in order to appeal to his audience, Brutus, directly. Cassius smartly avoids further development of ethos in this monologue to make sure Brutus doesn’t think this is all personal for Cassius and deter him from the conspiracy. Therefore, as mentioned before, Cassius’ intent for his second monologue is to appeal to Brutus. He wants to raise Brutus to the same level as Caesar and make him see that he is just as important in I.ii.9-15. This makes Brutus feel good about himself, and successfully makes Cassius’ arguments against Caesar more personal to Brutus and slowly pulls him into the conspiracy. Cassius could’ve used anyone’s name in his explanation that the name is equal to Caesar, but the fact that he used Brutus’ name made his pathos much stronger and directed at the audience for greater persuasion. This is where Cassius strongly considers his audience and knows that by implementing them into the argument he will have a higher chance at success. When Cassius then shifts into appeal to logos, he explains that Caesar, one man, is taking up all the fame and glory of Rome when there is room for much more than just one single, not even god-like man (I.ii.18-25). He explains once again just like he did in the concluding sentence of his first paragraph that it does not make sense that one man receive all the power and “bear the palm alone” (I.ii.43) He dives into the values of his audience and the people of that time who valued democracy, equality and even a divvied up triumvirate of three leaders who ruled Rome simultaneously in a checks and balances sort of way to avoid absolute leadership like the one Caesar is holding. Brutus of course would agree that, yes, why should a single man rule when the people or Rome and its government is based on a triumvirate with democratic…
- 895 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Brutus does not want to swear to the conspirators. He says the deal he is about to do is dangerous and he would not lie. In fact, he says that no one could call himself Roman if he breaks his promises “No, not an oath. If not the face of men… If these be motives weak, break off betimes”(II.I.114-120). This shows us that Brutus is idealistic and has a strong sense of justice.…
- 1812 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Brutus proves he is honorable with his words and actions. Brutus is in the battle talking to his comrades about what he will do next. He is going to make up for losing the war and not being a good leader. Brutus says “And this…
- 864 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Brutus is a patriotic middle aged man, who truly cares about the well being of his fellow people. “I do fear, the people, Choose Caesar for their king,” says Brutus. (Act 1 scene 2, 80) Despite Brutus’ friendship with Caesar, he much rather prefers Rome to remain a republic. He puts the masses before his own friendship. Brutus in return, is seen as trustworthy and reliable by the people. Indeed, Brutus is a noble man. Brutus says, “For let the gods so speed me as I love, the name of honor more than I fear death.” (act 1 scene 2, 90) He values honesty, fairness and balance. He is willing to lay his own life for what he believes. He is passionate and will do as much as what is needed so that what he believes is right will shine through. Brutus is easily swayed by Cassius in Act 1 scene 2. “Brutus and Caesar—what should be in that “Caesar”?” says the sly Cassius. (Act 2 scene 2, 140) After Cassius’ speech, Brutus considers the proposition of plotting against Caesar and does not shun the idea at all. Brutus is so willing to believe in his worthiness and Cassius’ call for action. He fails to truly listen to the Romans because he is too engrossed in doing what he believes is best for them.…
- 380 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays