Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Julius Ceasar - Comparative Essay on the speeches of Mark Antony and Brutus

Satisfactory Essays
601 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Julius Ceasar - Comparative Essay on the speeches of Mark Antony and Brutus
Comparative Essay on the speeches of Mark Antony and Brutus

Julius Caesar is one of Shakespeare's greatest works. It is about a group of conspirators in Rome who kill their king, Julius Caesar. The play follows the life of Brutus (at the time) - a conspirator yet an honourable man. His rival throughout the novel is Mark Antony- Caesar’s good friend. The pair’s likeness and unlikeness becomes clear at Caesar’s funeral where both make a speech justifying what one another is doing. Brutus appeals to the plebeian’s minds unlike Antony who speaks to their hearts and ultimately wins them over.

Brutus was first to speak. He approaches the podium with his hands dripping in Caesar's blood. Brutus began by stating his case for killing Caesar; the crowd was confused and curious as to the reason for his death. Brutus' justification was not based on a hatred of Caesar, but because he loved Rome more, he would rather see Caesar dead than his own country. Specifically, he says, "Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more". He then reasons with their mind saying that Caesar was ambitions and would become tyrannical in the future, “As he was ambitious, I slew him”. To furthermore convince the crowd he asks them to “censure me in your wisdom” meaning they can judge him. To round off he challenges anyone to say that they loved Caesar more than Rome herself. If anyone had spoken out it would be a direct act of treason. This was because Romans saw the state as a living thing- driven by the people, for the people. To achieve his goals, Brutus' oratory techniques were simple, logical, and rational. His speech was formal, controlled, and it seems that all of the sentences are perfectly balanced. Although he did a very good job at explaining to the confused crowd that murdering Caesar was for the good of Rome, he hadn't won them over completely, "As Caesar loved me, I weep for him”.

Mark Antony's speech is a piece of rhetoric. He accomplishes his objective of convincing the plebeians that Brutus is a traitor. He masters the use of emotion, subtlety and logic. He uses emotional phrases such as, "My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar" and "Oh judgment, thou art fled to brutish beasts". This gives him a connection with the emotion that the crowd is feeling at the death of Caesar. This is what makes him the opposite of Brutus, rather than using logic he uses his heart. He begins by praising Caesar. This gives him common ground with the crowd, who also remember the things that Antony speaks of. He provides many counter-examples to Brutus's claim that Caesar was ambitious. "I thrice presented him a kingly crown which he did thrice refuse". This tactic works with the crowd as they start to believe him “marked ye his words? He would not take the crown”, (quote by a plebeian). This indirect way of showing the crowd his feelings makes his speech more effective; the crowd is guided but not forced to his reasons. Antony is ultimately the better orator because of his understanding of the crowd.

Brutus is clearly overmatched at Caesar's funeral, both by Antony's duplicity and oration. Brutus gives a reasoned prose speech that convinces the crowd Caesar had to die. Brutus then yields to Antony who expends the 137 lines of verse using his rhetoric and his emotions to incite the crowd into “a mob frenzy”. Quite a masterpiece for a man who denies any ability to "stir men's blood”.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Does the intensity and size of the Hapalochlaena Lunulata blue rings change relative to the proximity and size of a threat? Introduction: The Hapalochlaena lunulata (Greater blue-ringed octopus) is a very small species in size that can spread up to 20cm. However, for such a small animal, they can be easily distinguished in its habitat, as when they are angry, their dark brown/yellow colour becomes covered with illuminous blue rings.…

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    William Shakespeare, a well known writer of plays, created several known plays such as Romeo and Juliet, Hamlet and Julius Caesar. In the tragic play of “Julius Caesar” , Julius Caesar was about to be crowned the King of Rome. However, Caesar’s conspirators, including his best friend Brutus, feared that Caesar would take advantage of his power and turn into a tyrant. Leading the conspirators to plan Caesar’s assassination before he was crowned king. Caesar was stabbed to death twenty-three times in the Roman Senate by the conspirators, including Brutus. Soon after, Caesar’s general and ally, Mark Antony, saw Caesar’s dead body and begged the conspirators to be able to die next to Caesar. Brutus denied his request. Antony shook Brutus’s hand with Caesar’s blood in order to join the conspirators and plan Caesar’s revenge. Both Brutus and Antony gave a speech in front of the plebeians of Rome in order to explain Caesar’s death. Both speeches impacted the audience of plebeians using logos, pathos, and ethos. However, between Brutus and Antony's speech, Antony gave a more effective speech because he proved that Caesar was not ambitious by rejecting the crown three times,had a greater emotional connection with his audience and he convinced the audience of plebeians that Brutus was no longer an honorable man.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    opportunity to do so because his speech was after his opponent’s. In his speech, Brutus proved…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Now, Shakespeare was a famous playwright of the time and it seemed logical for him to express his ideologies through his popular plays to comment on his society. Shakespeare was able to use scenes such as the Brutus vs. Antony orations to stress the conflicting ideals between truth and propaganda, as well as their effects on society. Shakespeare captures Brutus’s honesty when he states “I honour him; but as he was ambitious, I slew him” through his use of prose within the speech. Prose reveals to the audience of plebeians Brutus’ rational and logical thinking behind assassinating Caesar, to which he emphasised “not that I loved Caesar less, but I loved Rome more.” The way in which Brutus excuses his actions appears to be beneficiary to the population instead for his selfish purposes, as well as depicting Caesar as a negative influence to the Roman Empire. This is soon contradicted by Antony’s oration which was written in blank verse. The speech mocks as well as contrasts Brutus’ intentions implicitly though the repetition of “But Brutus is an honourable man” which follows conflicting contradictory statements. This depicts Antony’s oration skills as both more superior and authentic to Brutus’s speech as it exposes the contrast between higher and lower order rhetoric. Brutus’s and Antony’s orations, create a powerful…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lastly, Brutus supports his claim by asserting that he loved Caesar, but his pride and ambition would’ve hurt Rome and its people in the end. He uses repetition to appeal to logos when stating, “As Caesar loved me, I weep for him; as he was fortunate, I rejoice at it; as he was valiant, I honour him; but, as he was ambitious, I slew him” (Shakespeare). The author repeats “I” and “as” in a specific form to explain the reasoning for Caesar’s death. Brutus claims that he respects and loves Caesar, which keeps the respect of the public, but says that his power and authority was getting too strong, which he claims would hurt the Romans. Also, the word “slew” is a very strong use of diction, which implies that Brutus did not only kill Caesar, but he violently got rid of Caesar and his power all together. The people of Rome understand the justification, and can believe Brutus and continue to respect him. Overall, Brutus combines his reassuring and comforting tone with these appeals to effectively convince the people of Rome that Caesar was killed for a good and noble cause, and that the Romans will benefit and be saved from his…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, Decius Brutus and Mark Antony, both Roman Senators, eulogize Julius Caesar, each using a different technique and approach. Brutus, in a somewhat arrogant, to the point, eulogy, attempts to sway the people. He justifies conspiring against Caesar by stating that Caesar's ambition would have hurt Rome. However, in Antony's eulogy, he focuses on Caesar's positive traits, and cunningly disproves Brutus' justification for killing Caesar. The fickle Romans waver between leaders, responding emotionally, rather than intellectually, to the orators.<br><br>Brutus seeks to explain why he conspired against Caesar. He begins his speech with "Romans, countrymen ...", appealing to their consciousness as citizens of Rome, who,…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Brutus's speech, he begins by addressing the crowd as "Romans, countrymen, and lovers,” demonstrating that he is one of them and that he values their role in the Roman community. This helps establish ethos (credibility), and as Brutus continues by arguing that he killed Caesar to protect all citizens from Caesar's ambition…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The play called Julius Caesar is about the great Roman leader and his rise to power and fall from power. In the play, a character named Antony was a deeply loyal follower of Julius Caesar and when Julius is betrayed by his companions, Antony cowardly took to their side, as to be allowed to talk at Caesar’s funeral. At the funeral, however, he gives a speech that turns the crowd against the conspirators. Antony’s strategies in the funeral speech proved effective and a good use of rhetorics.…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The emotional appeal, pathos, is most used in both speeches. Brutus states about Caesars “tears, love, and ambition,” and also asks the audience theoretical questions that they could not answer, and took the silence as agreements. He makes the audience believe that he really loved Caesar, and had to assasinate him for the good of Rome. He says “its not that I love Caesar less, but I love Rome more” which causes the crowd to…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare is a play about honor, integrity, and political strife. Each character is faced with difficult decisions influenced either by ambition or honor. Marcus Brutus, one of the main characters of the play, although one of Caesar's best friends, is the head conspirator plotting for Caesar's death. Marcus Brutus is motivated by honor…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The overlook of Brutus’s and Antony’s speeches are not similar at all in my eyes. Brutus’s speech was trying to show the citizens that there was no harm in killing Julius Caesar, which there was. Brutus partially manipulates the citizens by saying how much he really loved Caesar, but loved the city of Rome even more. The citizens were moved by his speech because of how protected they felt by his words. Brutus talks good of Caesar, saying how there are tears for his love, joy for his fortune, honor for his bravery, but then death for his ambition. He shows the crowd how it was for the better of them. On the other hand, Antony’s speech rowled up the citizens more than they were passionate about Brutus’s speech. Antony put more of an emotion in his speech to the people. He showed how incredible of a man Caesar was and even showed proof of his will. Obviously the crowd easily changed their opinions about the whole situation and Antony knew just what to say and do. Antony was calm about the whole speech even when the crowd was begging for him to read Caesar’s will. Antony blamed Caesar's murder…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare is a play about a tragic hero named Brutus, and takes place in the early Roman Empire. The current ruler, Caesar is loved by many, but a small conspiracy of a few Romans builds, one whose name is Cassius. They are tired of his rule and are looking to free themselves from his way of rule. These characters plan to assassinate Caesar, but are looking for a way to do it so that it may seem justified to the rest of Rome when the deed is done. Brutus was first a friend of Caesar’s, but as the play develops, Brutus transforms and will ultimately be the tragic hero of the play when he kills Caesar, right after joining Cassius’s conspiracy. Shakespeare’s use of allusion and dialogue help the reader…

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brutus and Antony both use different rhetorical techniques to persuade the crowd at Julius Caesar's funeral. However, the arguments can be very different and one speech can be more persuasive than the other. Brutus's and Antony's speech have a different base on the same topic and both have a valid point in each. Brutus lectures about how Caesar is a courageous person. Antony, however, discourses about how Caesar is determined and how Brutus transferred captives home to Rome. Antony also speaks about how Caesar was a faithful man to Rome and to what degree he paid for his fault. Brutus talks about Caesar's honor and if Caesar was dead, then Rome would be complimentary.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brutus's speech was logical. It contained facts about Caesar's drive to succeed. He reminded the people that Caesar would have become a tyrant and would have enslaved…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin, Brutus’ speech was formal and more directed to the Romans. In his introduction he starts with “Romans, countrymen, and lovers! Hear me for my cause, and be silent, that you may hear: believe me for mine honour, and have respect to mine honour” This was used to join everyone together and later help him justify Caesar’s death. But he starts speech taking listeners as inferior, mindless and ignorant people who could sweep by easily. He was bound to fail as he could not understand the nature of the audience and projected himself superior on the basis of past but audience want to know about the present scenario and future. He had only one reason to kill Caesar which seemed as hypothetical and unproven, although, he found it enough to take mob on his side. Throughout the text he describes Caesar as an “ambitious” man. Calling Caesar ambitious makes it seem that Caesar only thought about himself.…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays