July At The Multiplex

After careful reviewing of the information provided by our firm, Mr. Plex along with the consortium decided that it is best if the firm conducted a random sample of 100 patrons and analyze the results. In turn, the sample revealed that 6 out of the 100 patrons surveyed agreed with Tommy and resented the ads. It only makes sense because if the sample were to have bigger numbers, you would see that there are a lot more people that resent the ads as well. Now, with that being said, if instead, 300 patrons had been randomly surveyed and 18 out of the 300 patrons agreed with Tommy and resented the ads, our answer would still remain the same. The percentage from both would still hit 60%, and that’s already more than what was asked in the first place which was more than 10%. The reality of the case is that obviously there are those who don’t mind the previews before the movie starts because that gives them a little more time to get to the theater if they are running late. Then there are those who absolutely hate it (like Tommy) and that ruins their experience. However, that has been a part of the process for a while and it wouldn’t make sense to remove the ads for the reason that the company and the studios would lose money. It all comes down to whether or not a reasonable person standard would take the same action Tommy did if they didn’t like a movie or commercials. However, since the percentage is actually more than 10%, the consortium will have to consider negotiating a settlement of some sort of any lawsuit filed by Tommy. Certainly there must be an issue with the sample size and/or the estimation of parameters in this case. I think they should raise the sample size to at least 500, if not 1,000 at most. Just to kind of get a better understanding of the statistical data and in order for it to be more accurate. I don’t think the data will bring much substance to a case that involves a lot of other people’s opinions, not just in one area. In addition, it is also