This source is legitimate because the information is up to date until 2009 and has an author. Also there are very few ads and the sponsor is popular for their knowledge. There is also a contact information, if you have any comments or anything to correct.…
Yes, I find that the source is credible. The author's findings and explanations are similar with other sources.…
I think this study was done by immature researchers who does a survey online for this type of research. How did this article even make it into Science Dailey it isn't that good when it comes down to what they used for research. My science teachers have always told me that this website is the best place for news and research articles I am kinda taken back by the way this article was presented.…
This source is credible because it was made by a school. The information is put on their by…
I certify that I am the author of this paper and that any assistance I received in its preparation is fully acknowledge and disclosed in the paper. I have also cited any sources from which I used data, ideas of words, whether quoted directly or paraphrased. I also certify that this paper was prepared by me specifically for this course.…
Enter and cite direct quote 2 from an article as evidence to support your analysis.…
This is a useful source because it covers our research question throughout the article. It has a lot of great statistical data that is useful during research and to include in the paper. This article does not look to be biased and tends to more objectives, because the article give factual information and it does not favor one side or the other.…
and current information, if there is a breakdown in this area the credibility of the…
After reading this article and all of the facts that are contained within, I must say that it looks…
Robert Ryan, B. Sc., is a Bachelor of Science, making his opinions appear educated and well thought out. Someone reading his article can tell his education is possibly foreign, because he spells some words differently. In one paragraph, he spelled organization, like organisation. In another, he spelled program, like programme. This article was found on the internet, not proving much. The website this article was found on is called Campaign against Fraudulent Medical Research. There is a disclaimer listed at the bottom of the site, which could lead one to believe that the information read should be taken lightly. This disclaimer states that the information presented may not be factual. Mr. Ryan did cite his sources though, inferring that the information used was factual. The author was an important aspect of the article, because his background knowledge helped shape the paper. Reading a paper written by someone with a college background is easier to believe than a non-educated author. The author claims things in his paper that may or may not be true.…
What exactly is global warming? Do you know the answer, maybe you do, however, taking a pretty good educated guess I would tend to think that most people think they have a pretty good idea when in actuality they have no clue what so ever about global warming. The current frenzy over global warming has galvanized the public and cost taxpayers billions of dollars in federal expenditures for climate research. It has spawned Hollywood blockbusters and inspired major political movements. It has given a higher calling to celebrities and built a lucrative industry for eager scientists. In short, ending climate change has become a national crusade. And yet, despite this dominant and sprawling campaign, the facts behind global warming remain as confounding as ever. Let’ s start by talking about the definition; according to Sir David King and Gabrielle Walker’ s, 2008, book titled “The Hot Topic “ global warming is defined as a gradual increase in the earth’s surface temperature. A more popular usage definition would be global warming is caused by human activity, or let’s look at a more technical term anthropogenic. The debate would be is global warming observed naturally or is it man made? Some might actually take on a debate about the natural causes, like is the sun getting hotter; or maybe the debate would lean more towards human causes, carbon dioxide , here is a good example: the exhaust from cars and power plants that pollute our air. Which side of the debate would you take? One in respect to thinking that global warming is a serious problem, then again maybe global warming has only clouded the issue or in simple terms; how the climate system really works and why man’s role in global warming is more myth than science, and how the global warming hype has corrupted Washington and the scientific community.…
• Is the source reliable? How do you know? This a reliable source do to the fact it information is from the World…
I plan on using this article on the con side of it. There is good that is being done that the author does witness, but also several negative aspects about it.…
Also from the same article by March and Schub, I have pulled some facts and…
3. Fran Dancing Feather and Rita Robinson are the authors. The information is verifiableand has supporting material relevant to the subject…