Juror's Guilty In 12 Angry Men

It was a hot, sweltering summer day for a murder case. Twelve men were placed as jurors for a young man being accused of stabbing his father to death, During a preliminary tally, eleven tired men voted guilty, while one lone man voted not guilty. That person was Juror #8. A simple man nearing middle age with full dark hair, dark mystic eyes, and a well-leveled tone, who carried himself firmly. Of course, the eleven men grew frustrated with this and tried to explain to
Juror #8 their reasons the young man was guilty. Juror #8 defended his opinion saying he did not say the young man wasn’t guilty, but that he was not sure. He could not imagine going through with a guilty verdict for a young, scared man who was hanging in the balance between life
Juror
#8 went through every logical explanation referring to these two witnesses uncertain testimony’s to convince everyone otherwise. As a result of all the valuable details, one by one each man turned their verdict from guilty to not guilty and included themselves in proving the others why it is not possible the young man is guilty.
Juror #8 truly showed respect to his fellow jurors as best as he could. While some were quite malicious through their words through explaining their opinions of why the young man was guilty of cold blooded murder. However, he was very firm with his point of view and his uncertainty of the guilty and did not change his not guilty verdict to make the others happy.
Some of the men in the jury were quite demeaning and only believed in their own point of view, yet Juror #8 continued to keep his patience while others around him began to lose their temper.
Of course, with the only fan in the room not working and blood level rising between the men, it grew to be extremely difficult to not grow angry easily. For instance, even after difficulty until the very end with the resentful, angry Juror #3, Juror #8, after finalizing the strenuous