Preview

Just And Unjust Laws Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
497 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Just And Unjust Laws Essay
In Martin Luther King Jr.’s “Letter from Birmingham City Jail”, King talks about how to know the difference between just and unjust laws. He states, “Any law that uplifts human personality is just. Any law that degrades human personality is unjust”(Shafer-Landau 408). King believed that unjust laws promote disharmony and that these laws essentially destroy human personality, while just laws uplift personality. In his opinion, he believed that laws were characterized as just laws if they were helping to make an individual better as a person, if it did not meet those standards it was considered to be an unjust law. An unjust law is a “code that is out of harmony with the moral law”(Shafer-Landau 408) essentially meaning that an unjust law is a law that is …show more content…
King felt that unjust laws were no laws at all and that they are laws that are meant to be broken. His opinion of just laws goes along with the moral law or the law of God. Unjust laws are essentially out of harmony with moral laws. He believed that “one who breaks an unjust law must do so openly, lovingly, and with a willingness to accept the penalty” (Shafer-Landau 409). In my opinion, I do agree with his definitions of just and unjust laws, and I do think that we should disobey the laws even if they are unjust because we have to be able to stand up for what we think is morally right and wrong, but also being aware of the consequences of breaking the law. King believed an individual should personally do what they think is right regardless of the consequences. But even if we do not completely agree with our countries’ unjust laws, we still have a responsibility as a citizen to obey them. He states, “One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws”(Shafer-Landau

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    While using definition King discussing just and unjust laws in the judicial system then. A just law from King's words is, "a man-made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God". King talks about an unjust law by saying, "a code that is out of harmony with the moral law". These definitions are used by King and how he discusses why segregation is so wrong and unnecessary. "…segregation is not only politically, economically, and sociologically unsound, it is morally wrong and awful." King says this discussing how he disagrees with segregation. Throughout King's letter he defines some of the words use to help the reader with his point of…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King frequently uses logic throughout his letter. He brought up many great facts and beliefs that sided with him. "We should never forget that everything Adolf Hitler did in Germany was 'legal ' and everything the Hungarian freedom fighters did in Hungary was 'illegal. '" (King Jr., 1963) Dr. King stated that even if he lived in a Communist country today he would disobey those laws that he thought were unjust, and would openly promote others to do the same. He explained to his fellow clergymen that it is sometimes better to disobey a law than to obey it. He broke laws that he felt were unjust and stated that others should abide by the laws that are just. During Dr. Kings entire letter he keeps a level head and does not play into the emotions that often come with a heated argument. His arguments were very heartfelt and…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first thing that Dr. King writes is what he thinks just and unjust laws mean. These two definitions gives us an idea of what he thinks just and unjust signify, before he goes deeper into the differences. Dr. King defines a just law as “any law that uplifts the human personality”. Dr. King is implying that if a law makes somebody feel good about themselves and makes them feel better, it is just. As used by Dr. King, just means reasonable, and…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dr. King also references St. Augustine who said "an unjust law is no law at all," (King 334). Dr. King also appeals to logos by comparing his disobedience to segregation laws to the rebellion at the Boston Tea Party. This historical allusion gives his claims credit and defend his thinking. Dr. King also uses pathos by describing the torment that many African American people have to go through on a daily basis due to racism and segregation laws. King states that they are "humiliated day in and day out by nagging signs reading 'white' and 'colored'," (King 334). Dr. King defends the protests by explaining why the segregation laws must be overturned and why things need to change soon. He states how African American people are disrespected and "living constantly at tiptoe stance," (King 334). He also describes how many African American people are constantly plagued by fear and hatred and that they feel no worth in society. Through his use of ethos, pathos, and logos Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. effectively explains and defends his actions. He also justifies anyone else who would like to be treated equally in society and would like to protest in a nonviolent…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In his “Letter from Birmingham Jail”, King talks about the difference between unjust and just laws. He tells us that everyone has a moral code to adhere to with accordance the laws that are just. Yet, the laws that are seen as unjust, should be unfollowed by the people. According to King, just law is a moral law or the law of God, whereas unjust law is made up by humans and does not have anything common with eternal and natural law. MLK would advise the people to disobey this act in any way possible, an unjust law is not one that should be followed. MLK was very adamant about this, the laws that are unfair to the people are meant to be disobeyed in order to hopefully change…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    King says, “Hence segregation is not only politically, economically and sociologically unsound, it is morally wrong and sinful”(13). King uses “God Law”(morals) to explain why segregations needs to stop. God always pushes you to do the moral choice, so why have all these church leaders chosen to head down the morally wrong path? The law itself it's okay because it is an unjust law, but it is morally wrong. But what is the difference between a just law and an unjust law? King explains that very well. The clergymen wants to know why they chose to follow some laws and disregard the rest. A just law is any law that makes you a better person, an unjust law does the opposite. That’s why king chose to follow only some laws; he was making the moral choice, and did what was right in his eyes. So when he was protesting, yes it was illegal for him to do, but in his heart it was the right…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King says an unjust law is “a code that a numerical or power majority group compels a minority group to obey but does not make binding on itself….difference made legal.”…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    King uses syntax when he scribes his thoughts about just and unjust laws. In particular, he describes unjust laws as codes that are out of harmony with the moral law and not rooted with eternal law, and a code that a numerical or power majority group compels a minority group to obey, but does not make it binding on itself. Since he describes a just law as a man-made code that squares with the moral law or law of God and uplifts human personality, Dr. King is saying that a just law is much more preferable to our society (742). After telling about the difference between just and unjust laws, he explains to his audience, in his opinion, a way to break unjust laws. One way to do this is to bring awareness to the law and how it is unjust without breaking the law. Also a group of people can stand up against the unjust law by talking before a group of legislators or some form of court. He also tells us that some laws may be both just and unjust. He writes “Sometimes a law is just on its face and unjust in its application” (743). Laws like no parading without a permit, seems like a just law on the outside, but also tends to include peaceful protesting and boycotting. Another example is the inability to vote or segregation of schools and public places. Although African Americans have been affected by multiple unjust and just laws, they continued on their journey to gain equal rights in…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Letter from a Birmingham Jail” was written in a time of civil unrest in the United States and served as a background to the fight against segregation suffered by African Americans. King used his letter to inform the world of the plight of African American’s and utilized natural law to clarify his position. In King’s letter he affirms his belief that he has not broken the law, he asserts that “an unjust law is no law at all”. What I believe that King is saying is that a law that is unjust does not serve the purpose of natural law. In this essay, I intend to argue that Martin Luther King Jr. in his 1963 “Letters from a Birmingham Jail” adapted the principles of St. Thomas Aquinas’ conception of natural law to successfully argue against Alabama’s segregation laws.…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King modeled his philosophy after that of Mahatmas Gandhi who also stood up to unjust laws, and spear-headed one of the most radical social movements for freedom in the 20th century. It was after Gandhi’s philosophy that Dr. King developed his own, along with his beliefs in his Christian faith. The beliefs of his faith allowed him to understand early on that there are things more important than rational logic and peace and order that are achieved by way of unjust laws. It is the nature of the law that is of concern. There is no true rationale way to follow a law that services different groups of people in different ways. The sole purpose of the law is to serve as a defense measure to protect and ensure the application of equal justice. The law is to be designed in a way that protects the citizen from harm. When it opens the citizen to the potential of harm on its watch or even worst it is the cause of harm it no longer serves it purpose and can no longer be obeyed with good…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Dr. King Speech

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages

    the fact that there are two types of laws: just and unjust. I would be the last to advocate disobeying just laws”. In this statement I believe that King is making the point that, although it may be a law, that doesn't make it morally correct. It is our job as people to follow just laws, but it is not an obligation to follow the unjust laws. Although there were laws preventing…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kings theory of justice in society is knowing the difference from right and wrong. His theory as a black gentlemen in the south is to fight against unjust laws. According to King, it is morally acceptable to break an unjust law, because a law that is unjust is considered no law at all. King abides by that injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. He believed in civil disobedience; which meant, to break a law for a moral reason even if it is unjust. It is ethical to break a law if it is unjust, but after breaking it we need to redefine the law to make it morally acceptable to society in which it is just. Another aspect that King believed it was non-violent actions. Non-violent actions was more socially acceptable for the majority to do harmful actions to the minorities. For instance, if the blacks (technical term) protestors were violent against the whites it was considered unjust, but it was just or morally acceptable because the blacks are fighting against an unjust law which, King believes is acceptable in order to bring just amongst the two races.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the words of St. Thomas, Martin Luther King quotes, from a jail cell in Birmingham, “An unjust law is no law at all” (King). After an affiliate from Birmingham invited MLK into a non-violent action program, he and along with several members of a staff were put into jail when asked, why MLK was in Birmingham King stated, “Because injustice is here”.…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Also their personal views are considered contradicting issues. When Marx introduce the Marxism idea it was aim to improve human society and to challenge Capitalism. Therefore, Marxists and Capitalists went into numerous conflicts one of the example would be the Chinese revolution. (Harkin par. 9) Also King and his people gain no civil rights with all the non violence protest, because of the unjust laws. In the Letter From a Birmingham Jail King states: “An unjust law is a code that a majority inflicts on a minority that is not binding on itself.”(King par. 18) Despite the fact that King in his letter point the unnecessary of unjust law, the government still ignores the issue and continuous to practice unjust laws. In result, King and the government officials have some major…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is the distinction between a just law and an unjust law? To me the answer is evident, and I have a hard time believing that anyone couldn’t easily know the distinction or disagree with the distinction that Martin Luther King Jr. makes during his “Letter from Birmingham Jail.” That “a just law is a man-made code that’s squares with the moral law or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law” (533). At its very basic definition, just laws protect the people and unjust laws hurt the people.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays