Preview

Just Mayo Lawsuit Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
843 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Just Mayo Lawsuit Analysis
A lawsuit filed October. 31 2014 in the U.S District Court in New Jersey has a lot of people in the consumer world talking. The Makers of Hellmann’s and Best Food brands of Mayonnaise, is accusing Hampton Creek Inc. of falsely advertising for calling its eggless spread, ‘mayo’. The corporate giant is demanding Hampton Creek change its labels of its Just Mayo products (which is currently an egg with a plant growing over it). Founded three years ago, Hampton Creek uses yellow peas instead of eggs in its spread. It has great support from the people buying Just Mayo, to back up its new innovative way of consuming egg free products in sustainable simple ways. In less than a year, Just Mayo has landed on shelf space in major retailers, such as Whole …show more content…

This being the case, it is easy to see big corporations who don’t deal with competition to backlash at the thought of another rival product that would come in any harm to their production value and economic growth. It is important to note however, this lawsuit only marks the latest on going battles between established food companies and the ever growing natural- and organic-food producers, that envision a cleaner future. Big named companies claim they are for cleaner eating, but this lawsuit is one of many that help outline, what we truly are consuming and what the consequences are. Again I can’t stress it enough, there's no surprise that this lawsuit came about. When a company is threatened they will fight at any costs to protect their revenue costs. More so when they haven’t had any real competition to worry about in decades. That’s exactly what Just Mayo is, the first real competition that giants like Hellmann’s and Best Foods has to deal with. Although it is hard to prove the quantified harm that has been done to the sales of companies like Hellmann’s, we can see they will try to metaphorically ‘smoke out’ the competition moreover, they will stop at nothing to try to protect their ideal company

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the case of Peterson v. Donahue, Neal Peterson sued David Donahue for negligence after a ski collision that occurred while both parties were on the ski slopes. Eleven year old Peterson was coming down the slopes very fast when he collided with forty three year old, advanced skier, Donahue who was skating across the slope toward the parking lot. Donahue saw Peterson seconds before the impact which knocked him out of his skis ten to twelve feet down the slope and knocked Peterson unconscious. Peterson sought recovery for the accident by filing a suit in the Minnesota State Court against Donahue alleging negligence.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I am currently working on a workers’ compensation case involving Dr. Cox that I want to bring to your attention: Cox MD (Jose Martinez) v. Colonelli Brothers; 2007-35183.…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1980, patient (plaintiff) James Johnson filed suit against Misericordia Community Hospital alleging medical malpractice. The suit specifically alleged corporate negligence in the appointment of Dr. Lester V. Salinksy (independent member) to the medical staff at Misericordia Community Hospital. During the surgery, Dr. Salinsky severed the femoral artery, resulting in partial paralysis for Johnson (casebriefs.com). Ultimately, Johnson suffered a permanent paralytic condition to his right thigh muscles with resultant atrophy and weakness as well as a loss of function after undergoing hip surgery performed by Dr. Salinsky (Showalter,…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Name: Traine Smith, Appellant v. Friends Hospital, Dewight Magwood, Benjamin Messina, Ronald Potter, Robert Anthony and Dewayne Thomas, Appellees…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Under the dual sovereignty doctrine, is it legally permissible for two states to prosecute the same defendant for the same offense without committing Double Jeopardy?…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this latest outbreak the government and its agencies are doing more to get involved and punish Chipotle Mexican Grill as a company. The U.S. attorney’s office for the Central District of California has partnered up with the Food and Drug Administration office of criminal investigations in order to prevent this from happening again. Together their goal is to punish Chipotle and get to the root of the outbreak to set an example for other companies. From here on out the FDA is not playing games, and will punish any and all who break safety regulations on food.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why talk about Anderson v GMC or even Keck v Wesley Medical Center? Because staffing is still an issue. It will become more of an issue as reimbursement continues to be curtailed. Moreover, as patient ratios are increasingly mandated, and studies of the impact of nurse staffing on patient outcomes are providing a growing body of knowledge, it is not only possible but likely that now that we can know what is safe hospital leadership will be held liable if they do not maintain safe staffing levels. Indeed, in the Keck case, it is important to note that Keck never filed a suit or even a claim against the nurse assigned to her care. Making a profit at the expense of human life and well-being is and always will be an issue that is directly impacted…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Anti-trust laws were established to promote and protect competition. This idea is the anti-trust law proper purpose. The purposes of the laws are not to punish big companies solely on account of their size, or to serve as an alternative set of “consumer protection” laws. The case of Oltz v. St. Peter’s Community Hospital is a different type of anti-trust case in which the hospital allowed a group of anesthesiologists from inside the facility to create an organization that directly eliminated outside competition from Mr. Oltz. The law was broken when the group of anesthesiologists banded together to drive out any form of competition, which resulted in the failure of Mr. Oltz’s business. Initially the organization of anesthesiologist from St.…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Only after the DailyMail published their story did Marc Ching file a lawsuit against Jeffrey Beri, the documents show Marc Ching filed the lawsuit on December 6, 2016. Marc Ching also waited till 2017 to file a duplicate lawsuit against Deborah Hall.…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    A young woman by the name of Karen Ann Quinlan experienced a variety of medical issues after entering into a ten-year coma from consuming a mixture of alcohol and tranquilizers. Quinlan’s parents filed a lawsuit regarding the definition of life and the right for an individual to die in 1976 ("FOCUS OF '76 RIGHT TO DIE CASE"). Quinlan’s story loosely inspired the creation of a novel by Barry Reed to then be adapted into a film, The Verdict (Simon).…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Facts: Coulter, the Plaintiff, purchased donuts from the defendants American Bakeries Co. After eating a few of the doughnuts she felt something in her throat. She received X-Rays that day which showed a piece of donut containing a metal wire that subsequently caused her injury.…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Odwalla Case Assignment

    • 520 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A primary stakeholder that is not directly discussed in the article are the wholesalers. The article states Odwalla markets their products through these supermarkets, specialty and natural food stores. A main interest of a wholesaler is to provide reliable products that customers trust. Through this e-coli breakout and what happened with the Odwalla Company, retailers could potentially not want to carry Odwalla juices in the possibility it could make their customers sick. Had Odwalla not made a recall on their products there could have been a chance that some of these retailers could boycott their products as…

    • 520 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Toothpaste and Colgate

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Colgate-Palmolive currently has a disagreement with SM. There have been no sightings of Colgate-Palmolive products in shelves of SM supermarkets anywhere in the country. This is a major issue that must be resolved as soon as possible, because as we all know SM is the leading supermarket in our country. With this issue, The Colgate-Palmolive Company is certainly the one losing in terms of sales and loyalty, because people have a tendency to pick-up…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is relevant to the production of mayonnaise because mayonnaise is an emulsion legally defined as including “65% oil and egg yolk”. The emulsifying agent in mayonnaise is the egg yolk, which is an emulsion of it’s own with ~48% water, ~16% proteins, ~10% lecithin and ~13% fats and cholesterol. Low-density lipoproteins (LDL), high-density lipoproteins (HDL) and various other proteins can be found in the yolk. HDL particles require an extra boost to improve their ability to act as an emulsifier…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Court Case Study

    • 2606 Words
    • 11 Pages

    On August 16, 1976, the Abalos spouses filed with the then Court of First Instance of Pangasinan at Lingayen an application for registration of title. The application claimed ownership of…

    • 2606 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics