Preview

Justice by Karl Jaspers

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1128 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Justice by Karl Jaspers
"Justice" by Karl Jaspers by Antonio Pineda

“That which has happened is a warning. To forget it is guilt. It must be continually remembered. It was possible for this to happen, and it remains possible for it to happen again at any minute. Only in knowledge can it be prevented.”

The above quote by Karl Jaspers, a German philosopher, used on the BBC programme The Nazis: a Warning from History, refers to the World War II and its atrocities. Married to a Jew, Karl Jaspers “strongly opposed totalitarian despotism and warned about the increasing tendency towards technocracy, or a regime that regarded humans as mere instruments of science or ideological goals” (Wikipedia). He was also distrustful of majoritarian democracy.

Jaspers’ writings have contributed greatly to international efforts to highlight justice and protect human rights, particularly after World War II. One of his best known contributions is a short book called Die Schuldfrage (The Guilt Question) and in it, he distinguished between four types of guilt.

First, there’s criminal guilt which refers to those who committed explicit crimes. Then there’s political guilt which involves and wrongdoings of politicians and implicates the citizens of a state for “having to bear the consequences of the deeds of the state whose power governs [them] and under whose order [they] live”.

Third is moral guilt. This emphasises that every individual is morally responsible for his deeds, including the execution of political and military orders. It would never be right to say “orders are orders” because “jurisdiction rests with my conscience, and in communication with my friends and intimates who lovingly concerned about my soul”.

The fourth, metaphysical guilt, is the most profound. Jaspers proposes that we should feel shame when we do nothing when others, no matter who they are, are threatened. Metaphysical guilt can therefore be described as an abstract responsibility shared among all those who failed to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The true story of Claudette Colvin is perfectly captured in the book “Claudette Colvin Twice Toward Justice”. This story was written by the award-winning author, Phillip Hoose. Hoose’s purpose was clear: write a story about a fairly unknown woman who helped demolish segregation, and to bring awareness towards the different perspectives on how she was viewed. In the book, Hoose writes about Claudette’s bravery in obliterating segregation, as well as how she was the first to kick off the goal. On page 32, Claudette refused to give her seat to a white woman.…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this essay, I will focus on the sentence and police officers’ decision in the Paul Bernanrdo and Karla Hamolka case, both known as “The Ken and Barbie Killers”. Since I am finishing my last year in Social Sciences profile Law, Society and Justice, I am interested to work on a famous Canadian trial that affected the whole Canadian population and even the United States. The decision made by police officers was controversial and brought many debates, thus I will analyze this decision under two ethical theories and determine whether they were right or wrong. For my analysis, I will use the Utilitarianism Ethics and Kantian Ethics. These two theories of ethics have different goals and understanding of rightful and wrongful actions.…

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    helpless by barbara gowdy

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Helpless, by Barbara Gowdy, was a well written novel which kept the reader interested right until the final page. Gowdy used descriptive language, suspense, and flashbacks to develop the theme that unrequited love lasts longer than love that is fulfilled. Gowdy used descriptive language well.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When arguing, do you often keep talking until your opponent realizes they're wrong? Or do you give examples in Logical, Ethos, or Pathos relation? Jay Heinrichs, author of Thank You For Arguing : What Aristotle, Lincoln, and Homer Simpson can teach us about the art of persuasion demonstrates and teaches the basics of arguing by showing Ethos, Pathos, And logos. Ethos meaning credibility, “Pathos” as in emotional, persuasion, And lastly Logical arguing. Jay Heinrichs has a total of seven books published, he’s a former editor of Dartmouth Alumni Magazine, and group publisher of the Ivy League Magazine Network Heinrichs goes in depth of how Aristotle has displayed three types of arguing being that “Blaming” is first which is spoken in past tense, “Demonstrative argument” which is in present tense mainly based on morality, “Deliberate argument” which is future tensed good or bad choices.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The writer, Reginald Rose wants to show to me from thus play is that the truth matters more. He wants to show that the truth what matter more because throughout the play the Jurors keep arguing that boy isn't innocent. Later on in the play the Jurors started to find reasonable doubt on the evidence they had on the boy. Like when one of the witnesses said that they say the killing accruing through the window when the train was passing by. It wasn't possible for her to the killing accruing because it was in the middle of the night and she didn't have her glasses on so it was impossible for her to see the boy killing his father through the last to carts windows of the train when passing. (Rose 15) Also when the boy was accused of murdering his…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    June Tangney’s short essay, “Condemn the Crime, Not the Person”, is about the difference between two emotions: shame and guilt. There is a problem in the court system when it comes to traditional sentences. There are people who even encourage America to look for shaming as a way to save money rather than taking care of an inmate in jail. However, Tangney states that recently, there is a realization that these cheaper ways are actually not effective. It makes the criminal’s situation worse, according to the author. The two feelings of shame and guilt are very different. I agree with Tangney’s argument because punishing a criminal should be in the fairest way with the…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “No amount of guilt can change the past and no amount of worrying can change the future”- Umar Ibn Khattab…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Just Mercy is a book written by Bryan Stevenson about his career as a lawyer fighting for justice of the wrongly convicted. While Stevenson went to law school at Harvard University, he interned at Southern Prisoners Defense Committee. After his first encounter with a death row inmate named Henry, he found that he loves fighting for justice for people that are on the death row. Although, Stevenson has represented many different people on the death row, his main focus was on Walter McMillan, a black man who was wrongly convicted of murder and sentenced to death.…

    • 96 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Year of Wonders Quotes

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages

    ‘Do not dwell anymore on things in the past that you cannot change,’ p. 162.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For Immanuel Kant, guilt is considered a necessary condition for punishment and judicial punishment can never be used merely as a means to promote some other good for the criminal himself or civil society. He argues that, an offender must first be found to be deserving of punishment before any consideration is given to the utility of punishment for himself or his fellow citizens. In this view, utilitarian concerns can never justify the punishment of an innocent person while guilt itself demands punishment even where punishment is entirely devoid of social utility. Therefore, again we observe that the best action is the one that maximizes utility and can be applied in various ways, but most commonly relates to the maintenance of healthy emotional…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The presence of guilt has been felt by all human beings. As guilt grows in a…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    [ 12 ]. Blamires, Cyprian, 2006, World Fascism: a Historical Encyclopedia, Volume 1,Santa Barbara, California: ABC-CLIO, Inc p.140.…

    • 2349 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    When we look at an action or its motive at first sight, Hume admits, our judgement may be altered by the resemblance and contiguity that person has with us, but as soon as we find that our judgement is biased, we will start to give up such a view, and look for a more general one . We would in the end sympathize with the people in the narrow circle which the person, whose character trait is being evaluated, has close interactions with, so that we can feel what those people with whom he closely interacts feel, and thereby praise or blame that character based on considering what effects such motives or character traits have on others. Such a position is referred to by many philosophers as the “general point of view”. The original sentiment is said to originate from “unregulated sympathy”, and it is the general point of view that “regulates” our sympathy so that the resulting sentiments are moral ones . Without the general point of view, sympathy is said to be unregulated because it results in sentiments that would differ greatly from person to person due to their different ability to fully sympathize with the object; but with it, sympathy becomes regulated because a position where everyone could reasonable reach, and thus give moral judgements on an equal basis, is provided…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, the judgment of regret is a person’s way of reflecting one’s actions and regret is the first step in the conditions that determine his future conduct. It is commendable and justified and this “judgment of regret” paves the way for a moral direction of action for the future, not because one realizes that the past could have happened in a different way. The recognition of a wrongdoing is an innate response to what we have done. It is not a form of punishment we inflict upon ourselves. It is only through regret or remorse that we learn to make amends.…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kite Runner

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages

    beings to complete a task. Guilt is a motivator because we are motivated to act in…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays