Preview

Justice In Plato's The Republic

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
737 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Justice In Plato's The Republic
In The Republic, Plato wrote a dialog between Socrates and his friends about the meaning of justice. They came into four definitions of justice, returning debts, helping friends, a system that benefits the strong, and a virtue that feels food. When asked about the meaning of justice, Cephalus believed that justice was the repayment of debt. Justice is completed when one‘s debt if fully returned. Socrates believed that the theory was flawed and may deliver disastrous result if applied in every situations. For example, if someone without a doctor’s prescription gives me money in exchange of some prescription only drugs, should I give the person the drugs? According to the “returning debt” theory, the answer is yes. When a person gives me some …show more content…
The next definition of justice was raised. “…justice is to help your friends and harm your enemies.” By that definition, we need to make sure that when returning debt, we don’t harm our friends as well. In the previous drug case, I should not give the person the drugs because he or she is my customer. Another issue was then raised. Socrates pointed out that sometimes we make the wrong judgment about who are friends and who are enemies. There are people who seem kind yet mean us harm and there are people who seem hostile yet mean us no harm. What about a good friend who wants us to use illegal drugs and a police officer who will arrest us for doing so. Does it make the officer a hostile enemy for trapping our body in a cell? Or does it make the friend a good friend for making our body feel good by taking the drugs? Socrates then concluded that “…justice is to do good to friends when they are good, and to harm enemies when they are …show more content…
Thrasymanchus declared that “…justice is nothing else than that which is advantageous to the stronger.” Everywhere the law is set by the ruling government according to their interest. They see that what is in line with their interests is just and punish those who depart from them. The established government is the master. The United States embargo against Cub made it illegal for the United States citizens to travel to Cuba without special approval from the government. Even though the people I want to visit in Cuba do not mean any harm to my interests nor vice versa, it is against the United States government interests. The ruling government has the right to deem my action unjust and punishable. The ruling government or the stronger is the master, according to Thrasymanchus’

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    What is justice? Today, where it is common for people to only look out for themselves, justice is an extremely important tool. But what exactly is justice? What is right, what is wrong, and who decides that? To find an accurate definition, we as a society should not just focus on one opinion, but the views of many. Similar to how our society is today, the society in The Republic, lived the same, struggling to determine what the correct definition of justice was, and how to pursue the right answer. In the paper, I will be discussing all aspects of Plato’s Republic, including the Philosopher King and his nature, and justice in that time.…

    • 114 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Looking up in the Merriam Webster dictionary justice is defined as "the maintenance or administration of what is just especially by the impartial adjustment of conflicting claims or the assignment of merited rewards or punishments". The fact that the word itself is being used for its definition explains how ambiguous the concept of justice can get. It is because of the very same reason that some time between the years of 470 to 399 BC a very well-known argument took place in Piraeus. The mentioned years are the time period that Socrates lived, the argument evolves mainly on the concept of justice and the goal is to come to an operational account for it. Throughout this argument lots of accounts are given by different participants, which all get opposed by Socrates. Two of these contributors are Thrasymachus and Glaucon. The former argues that "justice is the advantage of the stronger" while the latter argues that justice is not something practiced for its own sake (intrinsic good) but something one engages in out of fear of its consequences (extrinsic good). As seen in book one and two of Republic, Plato's…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The theme of justice is prevalent throughout the dialogue of "the Republic", as Socrates seems to be on a mission to discover "what exactly is the good life?", and if it encompasses being just or unjust. His journey is sparked when the oracle of Delphi prophesizes his future to be the wisest man…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this paper we will show that Glaucon and Thrasymachus' positions on justice are entirely different. We argue that Thrasymachus despite his slippage and confusion between a traditional and immoralist definition of justice, is really intending to illustrate a political system ruled by a rational-minded and exploitative tyrant. On the other hand Glaucon clearly presents justice as a necessary evil originating out of a social contract constructed by the weak of society. He then challenges Socrates to prove to him that the life of a just man is better than the life of an unjust man.…

    • 1831 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    If a man was not subjected to law or punishment would he choose to do what is considered just? In Plato’s The Republic, Glaucon, one of Socrates’ students, states a common view on justice. Justice is simply a lesser evil when compared to the two extremes which are suffering injustice without power to retaliate and doing injustice without suffering consequences. According to Glaucon, all men are inherently unjust, and only do what is just when forced to do so by law. This view of justice can be seen throughout history when leaders, like Nero, do unjust actions for their own personal gain simply because they are free from any consequences.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is justice is a question that has plagued philosophers since the time of Plato when he wrote The Republic to present day. In the book, Plato uses the dialectic, between Socrates and other Athenians like Polemarchus, Cephalus, and Glacuon, to try and find the definition of justice. Through the voice of Glaucon, Plato defines justice as a compromise of sorts between advantage and fear, and injustice as the things that we wouldn’t…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Politically, Plato explains the paradox of justice and the law. Plato believes that absolute justice is the same for everyone without exception. This justice goes beyond power and or money. He feels justice is not necessarily the law. "Law is an imperfect form of justice." What is legal is not necessarily moral. In Book 1 of Plato 's The Republic, Plato explains that justice is a balance between reason, courage and man 's needs or in other words, the head, the heart and the stomach. He goes on to explain that justice or fairness does not always mean equal. The law may change but justice remains constant. A good rule or law however is a just rule. Plato felt that to get people to act justly one must teach them ethics and values. He also believed that along with these ethics and values we must have a reasonable understanding of these rules. An understanding of these rules is needed so people are more apt to comply with them and therefore maintain a just and fair society.…

    • 2775 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates meets with some of his friends and begins discussing the meaning of justice and whether the just life is better than the unjust life. First, they contemplate the meaning of justice. Cephalus stated that justice is as simple as telling the truth and returning what you receive, Polemarchus stated that justice is giving each his due, and Thrasymachus stated that justice is the advantage of the stronger. Socrates proves each of them wrong and embarks on a discussion to find out what true justice is, and to find out whether the just man is truly happier than the unjust man, or vice versa.…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In response, Socrates points out that while honesty and timely repayment of debt may be relevant and important moral qualities in the business world, the application of these very principles may not result in moral outcomes when applied in a broader context. “I am sure everyone would agree”, he goes to explain, “that if you’d borrowed weapons from a friend who was perfectly sane, but he went insane and then asked for the weapons back, you shouldn’t give them back.”After all, if morality is to pay off all debts without exception then, acting upon his moral obligation to ‘return what is owed’, the borrower will surely commit the irresponsible and immoral act of giving weapons to a friend who cannot be trusted with them due to insanity. The contradiction is clear. Socrates concludes in light of such evidence that to “speak the truth and to give back whatever one has borrowed” cannot possibly be a complete definition of morality. Without putting up a fight, Cephalus submits.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Socrates is asked to defend justice on its own, but not for the reputation that it brings, he suggests that justice should be found in the city before starting to use the analogy of finding it in an individual. He then uses an example of a just city that aims at satisfying the basic human wants. Some citizens enter into political welfare as no one is independent. Nevertheless,…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In conclusion the justice is a definitive word, which seems to humans as a simple meaning. In Antigone by Sophocles, Antigone believed justice was the interest of her family, which made her moral in the eyes of the readers. On the other hand Creon’s believed his justice was for the interest of the state, which he later unfolds that justice is the interest of himself, hence he is the king. So therefore we understand Creon’s idea on justice through Thrasymachus explanation of how it benefits the stronger in Republic by Plato. Also including that Glaucon, studies Thrasymachus way of thinking, to further conclude that no human wants to be just. However, through Plato’s concept of justice , one can say that…

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justice is a concept that has changed and developed throughout history. The foundation of the modern justice system in the western world began in Athens just over two thousand years ago. Many philosophers had their own conceptions about what justice truly is, however, Plato proved to be the most influential. Before Plato, many men shared Polemarchus’ belief that justice meant giving good to friends and evil to enemies. In his book, The Republic, Plato sets out to define the true definition of justice. Plato states that justice is when men to put aside irrational desires for the greater good of society. If civilization were to follow Polemarchus’ view of justice, society would become anarchy. People would punish those that have wronged them…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Glaucon the son of Ariston and the brother of Plato was an ancient Athenian who was known for writing about justice and injustice in Plato’s Republic. Glaucon in Republic tells the story of the ring of Gyge’s ancestor. His story starts out with a shepherd who is really morally good. The just man is given a ring that can make him invisible. A little bit like the Lord of the Rings. Once he has this ring the man can act unjustly with no fear of punishment. The shepherd uses the ring to seduce the queen, kill the king and take over the throne. Glaucon is getting the message across that laws do not equal justice. Even the most just man would behave unjustly if he had this ring. He would be a materialistic and power-hungry. Maybe most people…

    • 1332 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This example relates to the dialogue because it is an example of acquiring wealth through the accompaniment of justice. It also appeals to me because I believe our government tries to carry out justice in each and every case to the best of its ability. Therefore, one can agree that acquiring wealth through this system of justice is a good thing or, virtue, just like Socrates had described. Let’s bring it to a local example. If one of your children were to accidentally break a neighbor’s window, wouldn’t you certainly feel the need to refund the neighbor for the damage? Whether or not the child who broke the window or the parent of that child refunded the neighbor, justice would still be carried out and the acquisition of wealth that the neighbor would receive would be seen as good. A problem I can see with this definition, however, relates back to our court system. In some cases, the defendant, in my true opinion, is sued for way too much money. The plaintiff has sued them for more money than in necessary and the defendant is not deserving of having so much money taken from them. The one example I can relate to this problem is the “McDonalds coffee.” Because…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle once said, “It is in justice that the ordering of society is centered”. In our society there are theories of justice, which is Retribution, Utilitarianism and Restitution. These forms have similarities and differences and are use in many different social groups every day.…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays