Preview

Juvenile Court Case Study

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
908 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Juvenile Court Case Study
1. What is the history and development of the juvenile court and justice process?

The history of the juvenile court and system dates back to the year 1824 in the United States, which was “The House of Refuge” in New York. “The House of Refuge was the first juvenile house of the United States. In 1899, Cook County in the state of Illinois established the first juvenile court. Youth in the juvenile court system dating back before the year of 1967 did not have constitutional legal rights. It was not until the year 1967, that it changed.
In the landmark case of, ‘in re Gault, 387 U.S. (1967), when the United States. Supreme Court required that all youth offenders involved in juvenile court proceedings and facing possible confinement have the following constitutional rights as adults. Following the
…show more content…
What developments, legislative changes, and legal factors and their effects have had on juvenile waiver and transfer to adult criminal court? The developments, legislative changes and legal factors on the juvenile system changed since the 1970 when the juvenile system was designed for the best interest of the juveniles, bit in the 1980’s and 1990’s the juvenile system started focusing on the criminal acts of juveniles offenders and presumed need for more coercive intervention. There are now three ways in which a juvenile can be prosecuted in the adult criminal system and that is judicial waiver, statutory exclusion, and concurrent jurisdiction.
A judicial waiver occurs when a juvenile court judge transfers a case from juvenile to adult court in order to deny the juvenile the protections that juvenile jurisdictions provide. Statutory exclusion, are provisions in the law to exclude some offenses, such as first-degree murder, from juvenile court jurisdiction. Concurrent jurisdiction is a legal provision, which allows the prosecutor to file a juvenile case in both juvenile and adult court because the offense and the age of the accused meet certain

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Illinois Juvenile Court Act of 1899 created a juvenile court that had jurisdiction over children charged with crimes. But, in addition, the new juvenile court was given jurisdiction over:…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The United States government is based on a checks and balances type system. The three main parts of this system are the executive branch, the legislative branch, and the judicial branch. This judicial system’s job is to uphold the law of the land. Law can be defined as a set of rules or norms of conduct which mandate, proscribe or permit specified relationships among people and organizations, provide methods for ensuring the impartial treatment of such people, and provide punishments for those who do not follow the established rules of conduct (Wikipedia.org, 2005). This is a very wide and all encompassing definition of the law and the governing judicial system. Just like the United States government the judicial system is broken up into different checks, balances, and systems. Two of these main systems are the juvenile justices system and the adult justice system. The obvious difference between these two courts is that the juvenile system is designed to handle youth offenders and the adult system is designed to handle adult offenders. Both of these two systems despite their difference have the same end goal; to administer justice. In the pages to follow we will discuss the big picture of the juvenile justice system, go over a point by point comparison between the juvenile system and the adult system, touch on both the benefits and disadvantages to being tried as a minor in the juvenile court from the perspective of a minor, and review the societal implication of abolishing the juvenile court system.…

    • 2342 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The adjudication process in which a juvenile is transferred to the adult court system can take place in several ways, according to the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). Transfer laws vary state to state; however, such transfers fall under three basic categories, the judicial waiver laws, prosecutorial discretion or concurrent laws, and statutory exclusion laws. Judicial waiver law is the most common transfer used and is done on a case-by-case basis (Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, 2011). This transfer allows the juvenile case to be filed in juvenile court but is transferred to adult court with the approval of the juvenile judge. The prosecutorial discretion or concurrent law gives the prosecutor sole discretion on whether to file charges in juvenile or adult court. No hearings that take place with this process ( (OJJDP, 2011). The statutory exclusion law grants adult courts exclusive jurisdiction over classes of cases involving juvenile offenders. This law requires juvenile courts to waive jurisdiction cases that meet specific age/offense or prior record criteria (OJJDP,…

    • 1973 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Juvenile Justice System is part of the criminal law system that focuses on those individuals who are between the ages of 9 and 18. This system was set up for those persons who did criminal acts, but who are not yet considered adults. In most states the age for criminal culpability is 18. While the age of being treated as a juvenile in the court system is up to the age of 18, this can depend on the crime. Juveniles can be transferred to the adult court system if the juvenile court waves or relinquishes its jurisdiction. Juvenile law is mainly governed by state laws…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    (The appeal under 28.U.S.C. 1257 (2) judgment from the Supreme court of Arizona affirming the dismissal of petition. The petition sought for the release of 15 years old Gerald Francis Gault.) Gault had been committed as a juvenile delinquent by the state of Gila County, Arizona. The dismissal came forth because the alleged denial of procedural due process rights to juveniles and various arguments against the constitutional juvenile code of Arizona.…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    262). Today prosecutors play a more major part in the intake decisions. Prosecutors have decide whether or not to waive the juvenile to adult court, of course the prosecutor must consider the age of the juvenile as well as the seriousness of the crime or crimes committed. The third stage, which is the adjudication stage, this includes the arraignment and adjudication hearing. During this stage a juveniles is informed of his or her right to counsel, right to adjudication hearing, right to confront and cross examine witnesses, and the right to have witnesses testify on their behalf.(Juvenile Justice pg.262). This is a hearing where the defendant is informed of the charges filed by the State and asked to enter a plea to those charges (Guilty, Not Guilty, or No Contest). The Judge also determines whether the defendant qualifies for representation by the Public Defender. (sao2fl.org)(William “Willie” N. Meggs). At this time if a juvenile pleads not guilty and adjudication hearing is scheduled. An adjudication hearing is much like a trial, but is held in juvenile court to determine if the juvenile committed the offence(s). In this hearing the evidence against the juvenile must prove beyond a reasonable doubt to support the…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Legislature has given the prosecutor discretion on filing with a defined list of cases in adult and juvenile courts. The prosecutor also gets to choose which court will handle the matter. U.s department of justice. ().…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The court system for juveniles in the United States was first formed in 1899, in Cook County, Illinois, which then was quickly spread across the country and most other state courts decided to establish one as well, that then in turn created the juvenile justice system. With the purpose of rehabilitating each underage offender in order for them to become a productive part of society and also to protect them by having them separated from any type of exposure to adult offenders and mentally ill adult offenders that were incarcerated as well.…

    • 3966 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Using a judicial waiver allows the juvenile court judge to pass the case over to the subsequent federal or state adult court. This is normally done after the judge conducts a hearing that establishes if the juvenile can be treated or if the juvenile is a "threat to society." The use of judicial waivers are often governed by the state or federal legislative body, unfortunately, this means that at times the law is based on a presumption that may not have a factual basis. In many cases regardless of current condition a juvenile may be rehabilitated much easier than the initial hearing will determine. Unfortunately, the law may not allow additional chances at showing if the case, which in turn means the juvenile, may end in adult court when the juveniles could have been treated through juvenile court…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The juvenile justice system process is rather new. The juvenile justice system really changed between 1966 and 1967; with kent vs United States and in re Gualt. Both added rights to the juvenile justice system that adults get. The evolution of the system sped up after those decisions. With eight very important Supreme Court decisions after 1967 till 2012. Each expanding the juvenile justice system.…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Juvenile Justice Outline

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I. Introduction: Many people would currently be surprised to find that youths being tried by Juvenile Courts are not afforded the basic rights guaranteed to our nation’s citizens by our Constitution. Advocates continue to push for more juvenile rights in the court system but many youths who find themselves in trouble will not be afforded basic rights and the due process of law based on their age. This paper will discuss the evolution of basic rights in the juvenile courts system, the current state of the issue, and suggestions…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juvenile waiver purpose aims to fill many different voids and address challenges in our justice system, which can be observed even in the different ways juveniles may be waived into adult court. One of the first methods waiving juveniles to adult court is with judicial waiver offenses, in which the juvenile court judge’s personally transfer cases to adult courts in order to prevent persons who are usually repeat offender’s; from the special protections that juvenile court systems provide. This ensures that certain individuals will not have the leverage of other youthful offenders, and ideally aren’t allowed to use age protection laws to their aid any longer. Another way in which cases are transported is through statutory exclusions that are…

    • 181 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juvenile Court Case

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Such statutes have had an incredible impact on the U.S. juvenile justice system. The original purpose of creating a separate juvenile court was to keep adolescents out of adult prisons, limit their exposure to adult criminal activity and poor role models, and also to provide guidance that helps them to turn away from further criminal behavior and be directed toward more positive results. It seemed that the individual juvenile offender cases were not getting looked at based on the individual characteristics or needs of the offender, rather whomever prosecuted the case was determining it based on the nature of the offense. Because of this, there were greater numbers of juvenile offenders having their cases in adult criminal courts, which do not…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Juvenile Court Process

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The court process for juveniles formally goes like this, after a crime has been committed, a juvenile is usually detained, rather than arrested. This is because, it is unlawful to arrest and question a juvenile, unless the parents or guardians are present. After this process is complete, a petition is conducted to give notice of the charges to the parents or guardian, and the defendant. This is usually a formal list of the charges. Once all of these things are done, then the court proceedings begin, almost as if the case were in adult court. We must still remember that, the level and intensity of the crime, will determine where the case should be heard; juvenile or, adult court settings. Usually, the process in the juvenile court, is to, deter adolescences from future crime. This means, this court tries to focus more on the rehabilitation of the child rather than incarceration.…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1899 was the first time we ever saw a juvenile court in America. During this time it was very common for children to be charged as adults. The courts believing by the age of seven, a child understands their full intents. Fast fowarding to 2015, we frown upon this concept. We have seen many cases in recent years where the courts have tried to charge children as adults. But many court cases have be denied. By the late 1980’s to early 1990’s murder rates rise within juveniles. This brought a new legislation that allowed many juveniles to be transferred to criminal court. On average 13,000 juveniles are transferred to criminal courts each year. What is making America change their mind on this topic? Children who commit adult crimes, are they actually…

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays