of them reshaping their lives around in view of the fact that they will not receive aid in an adult prison. In Gail Grainger article “Juveniles Don’t Deserve Life Sentences “she denotes how 79 nationwide adolescents that have been sentenced to perish in prison were told that they will never change and that no one cared what became of them. Instead of laws commending teenagers to this disgrace they should be awarded with access to rehabilitation and education programs to promote change. Numerous individuals presume that these teen criminals lack this change, but the former juvenile court judge Garginer clarifies how she seen firsthand the immense capacity these children have of turning themselves around. I believe that the same way we grow out of old foolish habits we had as children, young offenders can mature and grow out of crime. Jurors should take into consideration the massive age gap between real life criminals and juveniles, for they should not generalize their crimes within the same category.
Additionally, Thompson justifies the massive loss of brain tissue during adolescent’s years; they are still under development and shouldn’t be evaluated as a whole (Thompson, 2001). Jennifer Jenkins in her article “On Punishment and Teen Killers” asserts that she does not accept the “underdeveloped brain” argument, because she solemnly believes that if that were the reason, then teens would all have the urge to kill at roughly identical rates all over the world .Her argumentative opinion is hasty generalizing since she is presuming that all teenagers are alike and will be tempted to commit murder. Brains grow and change at different paces according to Thompson’s research group at the University of California, Los Angeles were they have developed technology to map the patterns of brain in individual children and teens …show more content…
. Although it is exceedingly difficult to have sympathy for individuals that commit heinous murder we should think in depth and attempt to analyze the cause behind why they done such.
In my opinion I do not think one is born a natural killer I strongly believe that the form we are raised part takes in the manner we will mature and become aware of what is correct. For example, I have observed that teens in my city are more prone to perhaps have the tendency to steal or commit a wrongful act rather than someone that lives in a better community. My thoughts are conceivably owing to the fact that many homes in my city are suffuse with drug intake, violence, environments in were a juvenile has countless problems or etc. If a child is exposed to these surroundings at all times then there can be a chance he/ she will reason that it is normal, because they become accustomed to that way of life. In a New York times article titled “Greg Ousley Is Sorry for Killing His Parents. Is that Enough?” explains a story in were a teenager killed his parents out of the blue one day , because he claimed they were never going to change and they will never listen to him either additionally to him being fed up with other family problems . He said “I have been thinking about killing them every time I got mad” “They don’t seem to understand me”. Greg’s thoughts and behavior were urged by his problematic home life where he was constantly the prime provocateur of his mother’s rages. The mother would
continually verbally make him feel insufficient by judging his appearance, his grades and constantly making him a comparison to Bonnie. So out of frustration and his impulses he killed his parents. This horrible outbreak was caused due to the massive loss of brain tissue juveniles have, because brain cells and connections are only being lost in the areas controlling impulses, risk, and self-control (Thompson 2001). It is comprehensible that the Supreme Court system needs to be strict, but like author Marjie Lundstrom says “Is he a boy? Or a Man.” At innumerable times a child or a teenager will commit mistakes or wrongful actions, but only because kids are different. Their reasoning is not fully developed (Lundstrom 2001).