CRMJ400 – CRIMINOLOGY
DEVRY UNIVERSITY
SHALAUNDRA REED launy.reed@wellsfargo.com 704-968-6803
NOVEMBER 2010
JUVENILES AND THE DEATH PENALTY 1
March 1, 2005 was the day that the Supreme Court ended the death penalty for juveniles that committed vicious crimes such as murder prior to their 18th birthday. “"The age of 18 is the point where society draws the line for many purposes between childhood and adulthood. It is, we conclude, the age at which the line for death eligibility ought to rest," Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in the majority opinion.” (Totenberg) There has and always will be a division amongst society as to whether or not this decision was the right and whether the Justices who voted for the abolishment of the death penalty were correct. While this decision came five years ago, the juveniles of today are committing more heinous and violent crimes than in years prior to and the repercussions for their crimes are not working. Understandably the law believes that juveniles do not possess the ability to make logical and conscience decisions, but is that really true. Most juveniles today are very intelligent and methodical individuals and in possessing such abilities, it leads one to believe that perhaps the decision to end the death penalty was not a good one. We live in a society that views minorities as ignorant and lacking the basic skills needed in order to survive. It is because of this mindset that I feel ending the juvenile death penalty was in fact the right thing to do. Not because the offender had not reached the age of majority but because the death penalty was very bias and more minorities were put to death at unequal rates as compared to their white counterparts. For example in March of 2004, “of last 10 juveniles executed in Texas, number who were black or Hispanic: 9” (ABA) Aside from the system being used inappropriately, the law also deemed that all children under the age of 18 were not able to
JUVENILES AND THE DEATH PENALTY 2 think logically and/or form rationale decision, which I feel is incorrect. While many juveniles do not possess the ability to make rational decisions, there are some who can. Instead of ending a punishment that would deter some the system needs to be overhauled in order to better assess juveniles as they enter the system. Many of today’s youth have no fear of the consequences of their actions and because of this, one would have to wonder how many actually posses the ability to not only think logically but have a true understanding of death. Knowing this information quite possibly could have assisted the Supreme Court in not ending the death penalty. Under different circumstances and a better justice system, I would definitely be opposed to ending the juvenile death penalty. If a youthful minded individual can be cold and calculating then that same individual can and does possess the ability to understand the error of his / her ways as well as understand the consequences of their actions. Perhaps, if as a whole, society was less biased and the justice system prosecuted cases equally across all socioeconomics then whether or not a juvenile was of the age of majority at the time of the crime would not have been the main reason for ending the death penalty for juveniles.
References
Juvenile Justice Center. (2004, March) Cruel and Unusual Punishment: The Juvenile Death Penalty Facts and Figures, American Bar Association. Retrieved November 25, 2010 from http://www.abanet.org/crimjust/juvjus/dparticles/factsheetfactsfigures.pdf
Totenberg, Nina. (2005, March). Supreme Court Ends Death Penalty for Juveniles. NPR.Org Dated: March 2, 2005. Retrieved November 25, 2010 from http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4518051
References: Juvenile Justice Center. (2004, March) Cruel and Unusual Punishment: The Juvenile Death Penalty Facts and Figures, American Bar Association. Retrieved November 25, 2010 from http://www.abanet.org/crimjust/juvjus/dparticles/factsheetfactsfigures.pdf Totenberg, Nina. (2005, March). Supreme Court Ends Death Penalty for Juveniles. NPR.Org Dated: March 2, 2005. Retrieved November 25, 2010 from http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4518051
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
On June 25, 2012, the Supreme Court had ruled that juveniles who committed a crime such as murder, could not be sentenced to life in prison because it is violating the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment. In the supreme court decision, I agree that it is harsh and should not be allowed for a minor to serve life in prison, even if murder is committed. The decision is agreeable due to the severe punishment on someone young whose life is ruined over the decision they made. The information on a minor is misleading it masks a juvenile as a brutal killer is society's eyes. These statements should be brought to the people who are disagreeing with the court decision, and prove that these minors do not deserve an adult sentence with life in prison.…
- 685 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The court also discovered that juveniles under the age of seventeen are more likely to be rehabilitated in comparison to adults which is why juveniles should not be offered the death penalty. It was argued by the courts that most juveniles cannot be fully blamed for their actions due to being so undeveloped. It was also argued that juveniles are more likely not to be deterred from committing a crime by being threatened with the death penalty due to the lack of cognitive skills they have in comparison to…
- 863 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Simmons was written by Justice Kennedy, and was joined by Justices Breyer, Ginsburg, Stevens, and Souter. Their opinion was guided by the courts then recent decision in Atkins v. Virginia on capital punishment of the mentally retarded, as well as their decision from 1989 in the case of Stanford v. Kentucky on capital punishment of juveniles age 16 and older. Justice Kennedy explained that a national consensus had formed in opposition to sentencing offenders to death who were under eighteen years old at the time of their offense (Counsel of Record, 2005). This claim was supported by observations that eighteen states did not allow capital punishment for juveniles, and twelve states had banished capital punishment entirely. Also noted was the fact that not a single state had lowered its age of execution below age eighteen since the 1989 decision of Stanford v. Kentucky, and five other states had actually raised their age of execution to at least age eighteen. Finally, in states that still allowed for juvenile execution, its practice was extremely unusual (Counsel of Record, 2005). Justice Kennedy elaborated on the consensus against using the death penalty for minors by noting that it grew much slower than the consensus found in Atkins v. Virginia. He explained that the rate was not as important as the consistency of the direction of change (Counsel of Record, 2005). All of this established an understanding that standards had evolved…
- 2284 Words
- 10 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Historically, children have been regarded as constitutionally different from adults. This fact is evident in the way past cases have been decided. Certain juvenile characteristics such as their “ immaturity, impetuosity, and failure to appreciate risks and consequences” illustrates the clear discrepancy between children and adults. Furthermore, the majority contend that instances that call for punishment as severe as life imprisonment without parole will be exceedingly uncommon and rare. Requiring that all juvenile convicted of homicide are sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole regardless of age or other mitigating factors violates the principle of proportionality.…
- 1029 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Roper vs. Simmons was one of the few cases in almost two decades to address whether it’s constitutional under the eighth and fourteenth amendments to execute a juvenile offender who was over the age of fifteen but under the age of eighteen when he/she committed a capital crime. In 1988, Thompson vs. Oklahoma banned the execution of minors who were sixteen years of age when they committed a capital crime. Another case, Stanford vs. Kentucky (1989), divided the court which eventually rejected that the Constitution excludes capital punishment for minors of this age group. Roper vs. Simmons overturned the decision in Stanford vs. Kentucky. Only seven countries in the past century have favored execution of minors convicted of capital crimes: Iran, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia,…
- 1044 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Virginia (2002) when the Supreme Court ruled it was unconstitutional to execute the mentally retarded, there has been a shift in the use of the juvenile death penalty that reflects society’s “evolving standards of decency.” A national consensus has developed since Stanford v. Kentucky (1989) in which the majority of states do not support the use of the death penalty for juveniles. Currently, 30 states prohibit the juvenile death penalty, and 12 of those states have banned the death penalty completely. In addition, since 1989, five states that previously allowed the juvenile death penalty have banned its use, either through legislation or through judicial…
- 1957 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
This paper will examine the history of the Juvenile Court system and its intended purposes, the history of capital punishment being used against minors, court decisions both in limiting capital punishment for youthful offenders, as well as upholding states rights to sentence juveniles to death. Most importantly, we will analyze possible factors that contributed to the decision of Roper v Simmons such as the international community's opposition of the juvenile death penalty and the majority consensus of the American public in outlawing this practice.…
- 3690 Words
- 12 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In a 5 to 4 ruling, the Supreme Court decided to abolish capital punishment for juveniles. After doing an experiment they concluded that it was cruel and unusual punishment to give a minor the death penalty because they are too immature. 20 states permitted the death penalty for minors. They canceled the death sentence for Christopher Simmons and 72 other people for crimes they committed under the age of 18. Texas, who has 29 juveniles awaiting execution, and Alabama who has 14 waiting, will feel the impact of this change the most. The Supreme Court weighs death penalty laws based on a 1958 ruling called the “evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society;” Also they look at the state legislation and the jury verdicts to decide…
- 562 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Mr. Acuna was the latest person to be convicted with a death row sentence before the age of 18. In “Kids Are Kids until They Commit Crimes” by Marjie Lundstrom writers about a 12 year-old savagely beated a 6 year-old girl to death, Lionel Tate said he was imitating his world wrestler icon. In April. Nathaniel Braizl was charged with first-degree murder at the age of 14, for shooting an English teacher that didn’t let him say goodbye to two girls on the last day of school. In “Many Kids Called Unfit for Adult trial…” by Greg Krikorian researched that teens are emotionally or intellectually unable to contribute to their own defense in court. In studies shown thousands of Juveniles went to an adult trail when they shouldn’t because of their inability to stand the courts proceeding. In “Startling finds on Teenage Brains” by Paul Thompson discovers that the patterns of brain growth in children and teenagers. The brain is like a puzzle that grows fast at the point of learning skills. Also, that the massive loss of brain tissue happens in teenage years at risk taking, controlling impulses, and self-control. The Supreme Court, adjurors on executing young juveniles as killers and to be convicted as adults. Young juveniles are incompetent on being well behaved as what Krikorian says “Seriously Impaired” or is that just an excuse? But knowing that you took a life is just unimaginable and horrifying. So if you did the crime now you’re going to pay the time. Even though your seriously impaired if you know that then why you take advance of that abuse and commit crimes. If you blame the teens you’re basically blaming the parents for unfit parenting their children. They don’t teach their kids form right or wrong and don’t control their kids. So minors are what so to be punished for what…
- 882 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Summary: This past Monday a ruling was upheld by the Supreme Court from 2012 baring the immediate life sentences for juveniles. In the past this has been an issue in Florida, with one of the nationwide highest crime rates for those under the age of 18. Last year the Florida Supreme Court ruled unanimously that all juveniles convicted of homicide who received automatic life sentences must be resentenced under a state law passed in 2014. The U.S. Supreme Court ruling Monday could have had an effect on the Florida Constitution was crucial news for anyone affected by this law.…
- 1595 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Simmons, Anthony Kennedy voted with the majority to prohibit the executions of convicted felons that were younger than eighteen (Lewis, T 2015). The decision removed about 70 individuals from death row. Those invidious were convicted before they turned eighteen. In Kennedy wrote “when a juvenile offender commits a heinous crime, the state can exact forfeiture of some of the most basic liberties, but the state cannot extinguish his life and hos potential to attain a mature understanding of his own maturity” (Ruling to ban minor’s executions is praised, 2005). Whit this decision the religions groups were happy because they believe that by give them the death penalty is vengeance and human beings have the opportunity to redemption. Other people believe that at that age young kids are not mature enough to think about the consequences of their actions. In the other hand there are people who believe that if they were capable of committing horrible crimes they should be…
- 704 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
People still debate whether juveniles should be tried as adults. There are many juveniles creating adult crimes and getting away with little sentences and use excuses like being too "young" or inherited genes. Some juveniles really mean to kill or hurt someone and that is not acceptable for that person to get a little sentence. In the article "On Punishment and Teen Killers" by Jennifer Jenkins, it talks about how juveniles deserve to be tried as adults for committing commensurate crimes which is a good decision.…
- 627 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In the United States, there is an estimated 12 million crimes every year, which is more than any nation in the world.In the last twenty five years, it is reported that juveniles are involved in one quarter of all brutal crimes in America not including murder. Moreover in 2012 it was ruled for all juveniles who committed heinous crimes to be sentenced to life in prison with parole due to the eighth amendment. This issues has been fought from both sides for years and have both made tremendous amount of facts and validated on if juveniles should be tried as adults or not. After closely reading articles on both sides I personally have came to believe only the deserving should be offered to have a chance at parole and many other opportunities in rehabilitation if the…
- 1371 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Our current criminal justice system frequently places juveniles into adult prisons and until just recently had mandatory life sentences for some juvenile crimes. The much divided Supreme Court ruled that mandatory life sentences were unconstitutional and as a result has sparked vigorous debate as many have joined the conversation regarding how juveniles are treated in prison and if our current system is working. Despite the fierce debate, current science and statistics seems to favor one side over the other. The current United States legal system is clearly flawed as alternative systems are superior, the current system adversely affects juveniles and their chance at rehabilitation, and recent findings on juvenile brain…
- 710 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In recent discussion of Juvenile Justice, a controversial issue has been whether juveniles should be tried as adults in adult courts for heinous crimes they have committed. On one hand, some argue that they should not be tried as adults and do not deserve harsh sentences but as children seeking help. On the other hand, however, others argue that those who commit such heinous crimes ought to be punished no matter the age. The juvenile court was created to handle juvenile offenders on the basis of their youth rather than their crimes. The purpose of juvenile court is treatment and guidance rather than punishment. Juveniles don't have the knowledgeable or moral capacity to understand the consequences of their actions; similarly, they lack the same capacity to be trial defendants. Juveniles today are more knowledgeable and cultured at a younger age; they understand the implications of violence and how violent weapons are used. It is irrational to argue that a juvenile, who sees the effect of violence around him in the news every day, does not understand what killing really is. The fact that “adolescent killers” know how to load and shoot a gun or use a knife to kill is an indicator that they understand exactly what they're doing.…
- 696 Words
- 3 Pages
Powerful Essays