Preview

Kant's Moral Theory

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1202 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Kant's Moral Theory
Sidra M

Kant’s moral theory

Immanuel Kant (22 April 1724 – 12 February 1804) was a German philosopher from Kaliningrad, Russia who researched, lectured and wrote on philosophy and anthropology during the Enlightenment at the end of the 18th century. According to Kant, human beings occupy a special place in creation, and morality can be summed up in one ultimate commandment of reason, or imperative, from which all duties and obligations derive. He defined an imperative as any proposition that declares a certain action (or inaction) to be necessary. There are two types of imperatives introduced by Kant. 1) Hypothetical imperative and 2) Categorical imperative. Hypothetical imperatives apply to someone dependent on them having certain ends for example: if I wish to quench my thirst, I must drink something; if I wish to acquire knowledge, I must learn.
A categorical imperative, on the other hand, denotes an absolute, unconditional requirement that asserts its authority in all circumstances, both required and justified as an end in itself. It is best known in its first formulation:
Act only according to that maxim whereby you can, at the same time, will that it should become a universal law. The second form explains that always treat humanity, whether in your own person or that of another, never simply as a means but always at the same time as an end.
The categorical imperative is the central philosophical concept in the moral philosophy of Immanuel Kant. Introduced in Kant's 1785 Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, it may be defined as a way of evaluating motivations for action.
.
Categorical imperatives are principles that are intrinsically valid; they are good in and of themselves; they must be obeyed in all, and by all, situations and circumstances if our behavior is to observe the moral law. It is from the Categorical Imperative that all other moral obligations are generated, and by which all moral obligations can be tested. The

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    HCM 420 Mastery Exercises

    • 2182 Words
    • 8 Pages

    8. True or false? The categorical imperative is Aristotle's tool for testing your actions and helping you make moral decisions.…

    • 2182 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hypothetical imperatives tell us what to do in order to achieve a particular goal, for example, “If you want to score well in a test, study hard” or “If you don’t want to go to prison, then don’t break the law”. Categorical imperatives, on the other hand, tell us what to do irrespective of our desire to achieve certain goals. For example, “Don’t kill” or “Don’t steal” are categorical imperatives that tell us to not kill or steal, regardless of whether we want to avoid the negative consequences of that action or not. Mackie denies that categorical imperatives have any power as they do not motivate us unconditionally to act in a certain manner and therefor there are no objective moral values since hypothetical imperatives already vary from person to…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kantian ethics are ethical principles set out by Immanuel Kant (1724-1804), a German thinker from East Prussia, and arguably one of the most influential philosophers in Western philosophy. His ‘Categorical Imperative’ theory was devised from his desire to create a stand-alone ethical theory that would not rely on assumptions, hence he believed in an objective right or wrong based on reason as a pose to assumptions. According to Kant, morals are a Priori synthetic because they are absolute, existing in and of themselves, and do not need to be experienced for them to exist. However, upon testing, it is also obviously true that they are correct.…

    • 2219 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lastly he states, “Duty is the necessity of an action done out of respect for the law.” One should act out of respect for the reason everyone could act on that maxim. One should act as an equal to when reasoning if the action is something everyone would act on. Again in the grocery store owner example he must treat all customers fairly because the maxim says he must obey this. One cannot make an exception for themselves and think they are higher than anyone else; the action needs to be consistent for every…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kant approached towards philosophy; he developed “The Categorical Imperative” which is a rule to do what is right. He believed that we shouldn’t lie to one another; he also believed that if we made a promise we should keep that promise. “Kant argues that the moral worth of an action it’s to be judged not by its consequences but by the nature of the maxim or principles…

    • 93 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The way Kant applied his famous and first formula, namely the Formulas of Universal Law (FUL) and the Formula of Law of Nature (FLN) to four famous examples of maxims contrary to duty, in his major works (the Groundwork, Metaphysical of Moral and Critique of Practical Reason), supports the thought that Kant’s ethical theory might be understood as a constructivist under the standard model. Wood puts this connection as follows:…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unit 1 Assignment

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages

    "A large part of Kant's work addresses the question 'What can we know?' The answer, if it can be stated simply, is that our knowledge is constrained to mathematics and the science of the natural, empirical world. It is impossible, Kant argues, to extend knowledge to the supersensible realm of speculative metaphysics. The reason that knowledge has these constraints, Kant…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Emmanuel Kant (hereinafter “Kant”) believes that Ethics is categorical and states that our moral duties are not dependent on feelings but on reason. He further states that our moral duties are unconditional, universally valid, and necessary, regardless of the possible consequences or opposition to our inclinations (Pojman and Vaughn 239).…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Case 6.4 Drug Dilemmas

    • 1435 Words
    • 6 Pages

    * McPhee, Isaac. "Kant 's Categorical Imperative The Key to Telling Right from Wrong ." Philosophy Suite 101. N.p., 18 Feb 2008. Web. 7 Mar 2012. <http://isaacmmcphee.suite101.com/kants-categorical-imperative-a44798>.…

    • 1435 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant philosophy has contributed in development of "pure" moral philosophy, a "metaphysics of morals" that is based on the concepts of reason, not on empirical observations. According to his philosophy moral obligations are applicable to all human beings as it applies not only for particular person in particular situation, but also to all rational beings in all circumstances.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Management

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A set of universal principles, which applied evenly to all decisions will result in fairness and equity in ethical decisions.…

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    What is a categorical imperative? A categorical imperative is a moral obligation which is absolute and necessary in any moral situation and isn’t reliant on a singular person’s desires or wills. For Kant, categorical imperatives are the foundation for morality because they invoke “pure” reasons for our moral actions and decisions since each rational being reasons to act outside of their own personal desires or will which may cloud judgments or impose a biased verdict of the situation. Kant explains this by distinguishing two different kinds of imperatives; categorical and hypothetical. Obviously Kant is interested in categorical imperatives and uses this distinction to show the difference between them so that categorical imperatives come out stronger. As stated before, categorical imperatives according to Kant are moral obligations which are absolute and necessary in any moral situation and isn’t reliant on a particular person’s desires or purpose. He also says that categorical imperatives (obligations) are such if they are of a commanding or imposing nature. For example “Don’t murder!” is a categorical imperative which is binding to every rational person and forces a person to act of good will. Hypothetical imperatives on the other hand are obligations in which there is an end result of your action which is in turn a result of your personal desires our thoughts. An example of a hypothetical imperative is the statement “If you want to stay out of jail, then don’t murder”. Here, there is no sense of authority behind it; it doesn’t have any weight or value behind it.…

    • 1801 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Good and Evil in High Noon

    • 1373 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Sommers, C., & Sommers, F. (2013). Immanuel Kant: Good Will, Duty and the Categorical Imperative. In Vice & Virtue in Everyday Life: Introductory Readings in Ethics (9th ed.) Boston: Clark Baxter.…

    • 1373 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    beings. M1 succeeds in passing the first stage. We can easily imagine a world in…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Stuart Mill

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Kantian ethics is the philosophy described by Immanuel Kant. Immanuel Kant argued that the supreme principle of morality is a standard of rationality that he dubbed the “Categorical Imperative”. Kant characterized the Categorical Imperative as an objective, rational and unconditional principle that we must always follow despite any natural desires or inclinations we may have to the contrary. All specific moral requirements, are justified by this principle, which means that all immoral actions are irrational because they violate the Categorical Imperative.…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays