Preview

Kant Vs Utilitarianism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
318 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Kant Vs Utilitarianism
Utilitarianism and Kant’s respective have different ways for demonstrating whether an act we do is right or wrong. Corresponding to Kant, we should look at our maxims, intentions, of a particular action. Kantians believe “If we are rational, we will each agree to curb our self-interest and cooperate with one another” (Shafer-Landau, Russ 194). In other words, humans are rational beings capable of rational behavior and should not be used purely for self-interest. On the other hand, Utilitarian’s believe that we should do actions that produce the greatest amount of happiness. However, this could associate using people as mere means and lead to the sacrifice of lives for the greater good.
Kant believed in moral obligations or what he describes
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Pirozzoli Ethics HU432 Exam 1
    • 3185 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Pirozzoli Ethics HU432 Exam 1

    The contents of this paper will analyze the GM ignition case using several concepts taught in ethics. This will include a background of the issue as well as a detailed evaluation of the decision by GM from the utilitarianism and Kantian perspective. This will show that GM’s decision was morally wrong as well as prove that GM should be held morally responsible for their actions.…

    • 3185 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Comparison Of Utilitarian Ethical Theories
    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Comparison Of Utilitarian Ethical Theories

    Utilitarian ethical theories are based on one’s ability to expect the concerns of an deed. Utilitarianism’s creed is that the result of any action takes importance over any type of means, this means that Utilitarianisms objective is to help as many individuals as possible even if it were to negatively disturb people along the way so as long as it helped the general populace. Basically, it’s the ends that matter not necessarily the means.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Eth/316 Ethics And Social Responsibility Research Paper
    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Eth/316 Ethics And Social Responsibility Research Paper

    Utilitarianism revolves around the concept of “the end justifies the means.” It believes that outcomes as a result of an action have a greater value compared to the latter, the morally right action is the action that produces the most good. It also states that the most ethical thing to do is to take advantage of happiness for the good of the society. This normative theory considers the overall good for all people and not just a single person.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Criticism Theories: The Consequences Of Utilitarianism
    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Criticism Theories: The Consequences Of Utilitarianism

    Utilitarianism theories hold that the moral worth of actions or practices is determined by their consequences. An action or practice is right if it leads to the best possible balance of good consequences over bad consequences for all affected parties. (Arnold, pp 17)…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    U of P / Eth 316 / Ethics Essay Example
    • 761 Words
    • 3 Pages

    U of P / Eth 316 / Ethics Essay Example

    Utilitarianism ethics emphasize that action should be morally beneficial to a group. This course of ethics is often known as “the greatest good for the greatest number” or simply put, “the greater good” (Boylan, 2009). In other words, the consequence of any ethical action should be beneficial for all by mass appeal. This is a common underlying theme for ethics in capitalist economies and business as well as in democratic governments (Boylan, 2009).…

    • 761 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism: Placebo-Controlled Trial
    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Utilitarianism: Placebo-Controlled Trial

    In terms of utilitarianism, actions are evaluated by the outcome. What we should do is to maximize the good outcomes and minimize the bad outcomes. The most promising way of reaching the final decision is to choose the one that would bring about the greatest net benefits to everyone affected by the action once the harms had been taken into account.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Kant's Theory Of Utilitarianism
    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Kant's Theory Of Utilitarianism

    This essay aims to argue the views of two different theorist, Jeremy Bentham and Immanuel Kant, with regards to their views on moral worth of an action. The idea of good and bad creates heated debates among many, but this essay will successfully unravel the layers of Bentham’s theory of Utilitarianism and his belief that all our motives are driven by pleasure and pain. While arguing Kant’s opposing argument that moral worth of an act revolves around democratic attitudes, and that moral truths are founded on reasons that is logical to all people. When one breaks down both theories, it occurs that Kant’s theory comes out to be the more sensible one in numerous aspects.…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Difference Between Kantianism And Utilitarianism
    • 136 Words
    • 1 Page

    Difference Between Kantianism And Utilitarianism

    From the vantage point of the history of ethical theory, there can be little doubt…

    • 136 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Kant And Utilitarianism
    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Kant And Utilitarianism

    According to Kant, he believes that the only thing unconditionally good is good will. Good will is the idea of people having to do ones moral duty. Kant’s ethical theories are based off of the categorical imperatives. Categorical imperatives, as stated during class, act only on those rules that you can rationally will to be universal. In response to Kant’s theory, I believe that good will is not the only thing that is unconditionally good. I believe this because there will be many instances in life where having a good will can lead to tragic situations.…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Utilitarian vs Retributive
    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Utilitarian vs Retributive

    Kant objects to the utilitarian approach as he claims it is practical and political. Kant believes the punishment must fit the crime and punishment itself when carried out accordingly and just, punishment is not evil. Kant’s moral theory is not especially preoccupied with punishment, and should not be thought of as primarily a theory of punishment. The reason for considering punishment at such length here is that in doing so, we can come to a better understanding of what Kant thought, and how he dissented from the utilitarian view, on the subjects of the moral importance of individuals’ well-being and what it means to treat someone with respect…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle's Argument Against Utilitarianism
    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Aristotle's Argument Against Utilitarianism

    Utilitarianism is an ethical philosophy which seeks to maximize well-being for the largest amount of people. This means that if you can secure pleasure at no moral cost, you should do so. It also means that if you can prevent displeasure for others without sacrificing anything of equal moral value, you should. In Utilitarianism the key is the well-being for the entire population.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Groundwork For The Metaphysics Of Morality Analysis
    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Groundwork For The Metaphysics Of Morality Analysis

    Immanuel Kant, disagreed with the Utilitarian principle that maximized happiness for the greatest number of people. In chapter 2 of his book, Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, Kant theorizes an external critique that we don’t always act for desires but duty instead. Kant really has this worry and he wants to find a firm foundation for our moral laws. According to Kant, Act only on that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law. Universal moral law is not empirical, not based on experience because then it is not justified and can take on different meanings. Once you strip away everything empirical, contingent, subjective about you will be left with a rational (form of the action itself). When…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ultilitarianism
    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ultilitarianism

    But this brings up an issue: most of morality is considered partial. It makes sense to care more about your children, family, and friends than complete strangers, but utilitarianism rejects this. If giving money, time, etc. to total strangers while “sacrificing the important needs of friends and family” results in the least amount harm than you are morally obligated to do so. We need to count everyone’s well being and interests equally. But this could lead to disastrous results. What if a majority of society benefits from an atrocity such as slavery? Utilitarianism would require us to allow it even if everyone’s interests were equally, since there would be a large amount of ‘benefit.’…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Occupy Wall Street
    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Occupy Wall Street

    Utilitarian is the moral doctrine that we should always act to produce the greatest possible balance of good over bad for everyone affected by our actions. The greatest happiness of all constitutes the standard that determines whether an action is right or wrong. Our belief that we are individuals and society is the net result of our choices. For example, the practice of blowing up rocks to release underground natural gas would not be permitted near residential areas if energy complaints…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarian Ethics Vs Kantian Ethics
    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Utilitarian Ethics Vs Kantian Ethics

    According to Kant because our actions often have unforeseen consequences, the morality of them comes from the intentions behind them. Kant’s theory states that nothing is good without qualification, except for the good will. The reason for this is that even though many things may have the potential for good, they have the same potential for evil; take for example the human brain. A will is good according to Kant when it “is good in itself, and considered by itself to be esteemed much higher than all that can be brought about by it in favour of any inclination” (Kant 55).…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics