Preview

Kant's Cosmological Argument Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
298 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Kant's Cosmological Argument Analysis
Kant analyses three proofs for God’s existence, the ontological, cosmological, and physio-theological. I will be focusing on the cosmological proof. Kant believes the cosmological argument is impossible due to the argument’s reliance on the ontological argument. Kant argues against the ontological proof by stating that ‘god is perfect’ does not hold since god’s perfection is contingent upon god’s existence; the argument is tautological. The cosmological argument assumes that based on our experience of this world, there must be something that caused everything, and that something must be a necessary being. However, there is no reason to believe the necessary being is God without the ontological argument. Kant already established that the ontological
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Kalam Cosmological Argument Analysis
    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Kalam Cosmological Argument Analysis

    Who is responsible for creating all of mankind and all that surrounds it? God is responsible for the creation of the universe and the existence of that personal God is proven by a plethora of scientific evidence and logically probable reasons. Ironically, some of the opposing arguments originating from the atheistic worldview contribute to the constructing of theistic truths. While using the multiple competing hypotheses method of finding the most probable cause to the universe and the existence of all mankind, a personal creator fits better than the probability of creation just happening by chance. This universe is very complex and the existence of the personal creator can be explained in two arguments out of the many existing arguments…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cosmological Argument From Evil Essay
    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Cosmological Argument From Evil Essay

    Outline the Ontological argument for the existence of God and consider the view that, while it may strengthen a believer’s faith, it has no value for the non ....…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Key Features of the Cosmological Argument
    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Key Features of the Cosmological Argument

    The cosmological argument seeks to prove the existence of God on the basis that the universe has not always been in existence and so for it to be created, an external cause was necessary; this outside agent is viewed as God. It creates à posteriori knowledge which provides inductive explanations and makes conclusions on ideas based on actual experiences. It is a non-propositional argument so it cannot be proven but can be argued by offering experience as support.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Teleological Argumentative Analysis
    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Teleological Argumentative Analysis

    Throughout the course of time, many philosophers, dogmatic religions and even individual human beings themselves have tried to prove the existence of God. The recurrent question that constantly arises is whether or not you can prove the existence of God solely by rational thinking alone. To that, the answer is no. It is not possible to prove the existence of God solely by rational thinking as you also need to incorporate aspects of faith, but rational thinking helps solidify your beliefs pertaining to God and leaves the answers we cannot conceive rationally up to faith. You cannot understand something outside of your existence rationally because you cannot experience it or see it; you can only theorize, believe and trust in it. You will never be able to reason what you have no knowledge of. In this essay, I will argue that in…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Cosmological Argumentative Analysis
    • 247 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Cosmological Argumentative Analysis

    In The Cosmological Argument Premise 2 explains that everything cannot be a dependent living thing. William Rowe explains why the Principle of Sufficient reason is true, then premise 2 is also true. Rowe suggests that there has never been a self-existing living thing, but only an infinite series of dependent living things. In this case, every living thing has an explanation, because it is explained if a living thing that came before it then that caused its existence.…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Response To Anselm's Ontological Argument
    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Response To Anselm's Ontological Argument

    In the “Proslogion” Anselm argues God as the greatest conceivable being that exists in reality. In this essay, I will show that Anselm’s ontological argument is sound and his conclusion logically follows from his premises. I will consider an objection towards Anselm’s definition of God and show that it is unconvincing and flawed. The objection against Anselm’s ontological argument that I will consider will be one brought up by a contemporary of Anselm, Gauinilo.…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant's Critique Of Reason
    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Immanuel Kant's Critique Of Reason

    Kant states that objects of belief are based on a priori reasoning, that the idea of a maximally great and omnipotent God is an a priori idea about a supersensible reality in the world of the noumena. A priori elements of cognition are innate to reason, whereas a posteriori elements are derived from sense, and he argues that both are equally crucial for knowledge. A priori perceptions and concepts also provide some a priori knowledge. For something to become an object of knowledge, it must be experienced, primarily, as Kant argues, by the senses. He concludes that it is impossible to prove the truth about God or any other supersensible concept such as the immortality of the soul or the freedom of the will which belong to the world of the noumena as theses supersensible concepts are matters of faith and therefore objects of belief – it is a common error to employ a priori reason beyond the domain of the senses and beyond the facts of empirical knowledge. God is not a fact, as facts are given by empirical knowledge, observation and the…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ontological Argument Analysis
    • 92 Words
    • 1 Page

    Ontological Argument Analysis

    The existence of God is one of the greatly talked about philosophical topics throughout history. There have been many arguments proposed in order to answer the question. One argument is the ontological argument. The first person to propose the ontological argument is St. Anselm in the eleventh century. St. Anselm tries to prove the existence God from the idea of a being that which no greater being can be imagined. St. Anselm contemplated that, if such a being did not exist, then a more superior being can be thought of to…

    • 92 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kant's Argumentative Analysis
    • 195 Words
    • 1 Page

    Kant's Argumentative Analysis

    In order to discover what is moral or not, Kant believes that categorical imperative gives reasoning for any sort of action. In order to do so, one must think about the fundamental rule that goes in hand with what the person plans to fulfill in the first place. If a certain act can be applied to others and puts them in that exact situation, then it is moral. One concept of categorical imperative is known as “The Principle of Ends.” This theory describes individuals as worthy and valuable, depicting them as something worth more than a mere object. This pairs with the saying “treat others as you would like to be treated.” On a general status, I believe that this should be the correct thing to do. Concerning Kant, I disagree with his argument…

    • 195 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kant Paper 2

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Kant Paper 2

    maxim and why you could not achieve the purpose or end of the maxim in…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Emmanuel Kant Analysis
    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Emmanuel Kant Analysis

    Emmanuel Kant argues that the human understanding of our world is perceived by our experiences and only through them can we gain knowledge. Kant’s philosophic question is rooted in the theory of understanding; in short, what can we know and how can we know it? Most of our knowledge of the world can be derived from our observation of it. As children, we see things, touch things, smell things and so on. Gradually, we understand the world in which we live in; this is the knowledge of sense-perception. For example, wind has no physical form but we can see its effects and can classify it as being part of nature. Kant, however, perceives knowledge only through our experiences. So going back to the example of wind, Kant would say we have knowledge of wind not because we…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant Analysis
    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Immanuel Kant Analysis

    Immanuel Kant is a philosopher that has always stuck out because the way he approaches morality is particularly different than most other philosopher. Some would say that Kant’s philosophy works satisfactorily in a perfect world, but fails to account for how the world actually is, which is far from perfect. Even if this is true the groundwork of Kant’s work has still garnered the admiration of many philosophers that were during and after his time.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    God's Existence Can Be Proven a Priori
    • 1634 Words
    • 7 Pages

    God's Existence Can Be Proven a Priori

    There are two main arguments for the ontological argument which seeks to prove the existence of God a priori. The first argument is from Anselm; he was the Archbishop of Canterbury and therefore started his argument from a theistic point of view. Anselm believed that no belief in God was absurd and he used a reducio ad absurdum argument, which tries to show that God not existing could not be believed because in not believing you are adopting a nonsensical argument. His starting point was his definition of God, ‘God is the thought than which nothing greater can be conceived’. Firstly Anselm attacks the idea that there is no God, even the thought that there is no God requires the concept of God. The greatest possible being has to exist in reality as well as in the mind to be the greatest possible being therefore we can conceive of the greatest possible being because it also has to exist in reality. A criticism that was raised about the greatest possible being is that we as humans all have different ideas of what it could be but Anselm responded by saying that when we reach the idea of such a high level being such as God then the idea of what it is becomes very similar. Therefore God exists according to Anselm. Also God is considered to be a necessary being, which will always exist, does not rely on other beings and cannot not exist, therefore God must exist if he is to be called a necessary being.…

    • 1634 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Ontological Argument
    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Ontological Argument

    Through the ontological argument, Anselm seeks to prove that God exists and he attempts to refute the fool who says in his heart that there is no God. This fool has two important characteristics: he understands the claim that God exists and he does not believe that God exists. Gaunilo plays the role of the “fool” and challenges Anselm’s ontological argument. I will argue that Anselm’s response to Gaunilo’s attack is not adequate because it does not address the issue of certainty, which plays an important role in Gaunilo’s objection. First, I will explain, in greater depth, Anselm’s ontological argument. I will then elaborate on why Gaunilo denies that than which nothing greater can be conceived exists in the understanding. Lastly, I will argue why Anselm’s response to Gaunilo’s attack is insufficient.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Descartes Method Of Doubt
    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Descartes Method Of Doubt

    To understand Immanuel Kant, you must first understand Descartes. Descartes believes that God created the outside world so we can see experiences and came up with the ontological argument which is an argument based on the meaning of term “God”. “The ontological argument claims that the idea that God doesn’t exist is just as absurd as the idea that a four-sided triangle exists. According to the ontological argument, we can tell that the claim that God doesn’t exist is false without having to look into it in any detail.” (http://www.existence-of-god.com/ontological-argument.html). Kant would argue with Descartes because you have never experienced God and you can’t think of things in them self because you will always imagine yourself experiencing it. He believes that our world is only a world of experience. Anselm does not accept Kant’s views because you can’t define tangible things as existing because you can imagine them not existing. He thinks you can imagine any physical and tangible thing not existing in the world but you can’t imagine God not existing in any world. He says that God’s nature is to exist so you can’t talk about God without existence just like a triangle can’t have four…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics