Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Karl Marx Theory of Religion

Satisfactory Essays
432 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Karl Marx Theory of Religion
Student’s Name: Nadine Abdallah ID: 71330150

Course: Introduction to Sociology Code: SSCI200

Instructor’s Name: Dr. Jamal Quadoura

Topic: Karl Marx Theory of Religion

Karl Marx “Religion is the sigh of the exploited creature, the heart of a heartless world, just as it is the spirit of a spiritless situation. It is the opium of the people.”

Marx’s theory states that religion was created to help control the non-superior class.
Karl Marx viewed religion as a social control used by the bourgeoisie to keep the proletariat to maintain the status quo in a given society.
Example: Many types of people, whether they are Catholic, Muslim, or Jewish, are expected to follow their family’s religion as a social norm. From Marxist perspective, these expectations become part of religion’s ability to control society and maintain the status quo.

Religion as Ideology
For Marx, ideology is a belief system that changes people’s perception of reality in ways that serve the interests of the ruling class.
In Marx’s view, religion operates as an ideological weapon used by the ruling class to justify the suffering of the poor as something expected and God-given.
Religion misleads the poor into believing that their suffering is good and that they will be favoured in the afterlife. Such beliefs create a false consciousness.

Religion and Alienation
Alienation involves becoming separated from or loosing control over something that one has produced or created. Alienation exists in all classes, but is more extreme under capitalism.
Under capitalism workers are alienated because they do not own what they produce and have no control over the production process.
Thus, Marx sees religion as the product of alienation. It arises out of suffering and acts as a support for it, but fails to deal with its cause it is namely class exploitation. Religion acts as an ideology that justifies both the suffering of the poor and the power of the working class.

Dehumanization and Exploit
Religion acts as an reliever to dull the pain of exploitation. It masks rather than treats. Because religion is a distorted view of the world, it can offer no solution to earthly misery.
Instead, it’s promises of the afterlife create an illusory happiness that distracts attention from the true source of the suffering, namely capitalism.

Evaluation
Marx shows how religion may be a tool of oppression and creates false consciousness. however he ignores the positive functions of religion.
Religion doesn't necessarily function effectively as an ideology to control the population. Christianity was a major element of ruling-class ideology and hasn't limited impact on the poor.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Marx’s plan for reforming society may be more tangible than Kuyper’s, but his plan uses rather cruel and destructive tactics. For instance, Marx believes that the family has become an instrument of oppression and should be eliminated. Marx’s plan for consolidating the family directly contradicts biblical principles and is no less than an attempt to undermine God’s authority. Marx believes the family is merely a product of the class system and not a God ordained institution. Besides Marx’s cruel elimination of the family, his plan further feeds man’s greed and selfishness. Communism’s prohibition of private property claims to produce economic equality. However, this notion seems only to further feed man unhealthy relationship with the material world and denies God his rightful place of power. Without God’s moral authority, man is left to reshape society as he sees fit but at the cost of losing all that is good. After examining Marx argument, the idea of communism does not seem to present an effective solution for resolving poverty in either Marx’s day or in the twenty-first…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Functionalists and Marxists are the theorists who claim that religion is a conservative force, functionalists believe that religion promotes a stable society with no disruptions. Marxists on the other hand believe that the Bourgeoisie use religion to maintain their position of power in society, therefore keeping things as they are. Marx claimed that religion was an effective aget of social control, referring to religion as the ‘Opium of the masses’, pumping perception-distorting drugs into the proletariat like a hypodermic needle. For him it was a mechanism of social control, regulating the behaviour of the working class and preventing them from seeing their true situation in society.…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx believed that society is based upon a conflict between Bourgeoisies (Ruling class, Upper class) and Proletariat (Working class). Marx believed that the ruling class were exploiting the working class.…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Grand Inquisitor Analysis

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Marx believed that religion is analogous to an opiate or an illusion of happiness that common people feel they must have to endure a world in which they do not have or are prevented from having true happiness. Plato’s view of social class dynamics was that those in power had to invent noble lies and pious frauds to keep the common people in the state of somnolence and ignorance for which they were suited. Khomeini, however, believed that religion is necessary to provide a political society with moral order and stability, something that a liberal secular society could not do. In fact, Khomeini viewed religion as a panacea for all social ills. Critics of this view argue that using religion…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapter 9 Summary

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages

    According to Freud, Marx and others philosophers, they believed that religion is “the opium…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He claims that Christianity teaches ideas similar to communism, and should not be horrified by how these ideas are set in motion. Marx misunderstands that while Christianity does not encourage the accumulation of personal belongings, it also does not advocate distribution of rich peoples’ property. Christians should be ashamed of their ignorance and lack of action on behalf of the poor. However, stripping the rich of their wealth will not resolve the social issue as it effects more than the economic institutions of…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx a Marxist sees religion as an illusion and that the phenomenon of religion is part of what Marx refers to as an alienation of people which causes conflict in society. He saw society as divided into two social classes with one dominating the other. And he saw religion as promoting inequalities and class conflict in society. He argues that religion is part of a dominant ideology that is the idea that religion is a tool used by the bourgeoisie (Ruling class) to convince the working class to accept low paid jobs and so exploits the working class, reproducing and reinforcing false consciousness.…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Karl Marx: Of course god was in your side in this bourgeoisie game!! The audacity of smug capitalist elitists to create this game, where…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Religion has affected society both positively and negatively throughout life. Most religions promote and educate individuals in social virtues; how to choose right over wrong regardless of personal desire (Fisher, 2005). Many charities feed, cloth, and shelter the homeless all in the name of their God and acting on their faith. Unfortunately, while organized religion promotes faith in positive social virtues it also can instill fear and oppress its follower at times. The followers who see the founder of a religion to be extraordinary or supernatural could be mislead by a dishonest and unethical leader (Fisher, 2005).…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Capitalists employ workers and they work through putting their efforts and then getting paid for supporting their families. How hard they work, how much degree they lost themselves, the more products they would produce. They always want to manufacture high quality products, as a result, the higher quality the products, the more they consuming themselves, finally, they are not the person they should being themselves anymore, and they are treated badly, and they would become coward and blunt. Consequently, the workers are become slaves of capitalists. In the common condition, it is our instinct to think that the people who put effort to produce, who owns the product of labor; but under society of capitalism, the main force is private ownership, as a result, the workers’ efforts are nothing or meaningless to themselves. It only has significant impacts to the capitalists. Alienation may occur in the form that many industrials have highly specialized functions on the assembly line and none can do the full job. Which reminds me a condition in 19th in china, during 19 to 20 century, since china becomes an important exporter so the country is growing fast and emerges a lot of manufacturing and technologic industries, which means a manufacturing industry may have over ten thousand workers. They work hard and the process of production is complex and enormous. There is a technologic company in Shenzhen named Foxconn has almost eight hundred thousand employees in China, and always occur suicide incidents because of the intense working speed and nervous working environment. I think the workers in this company are overly devoting themselves to the company and finally lost themselves in their own…

    • 1788 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The capitalist system caused the alienation of the workers, therefore causing them not to be able to live to the fullest…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx did not believe in god. He was well known for his ideas about alienation. He believed everyone was born with a creative spirit, i.e. species being. Conflict is to fight or to battle, Karl Marx was the founder of conflict theory, according to sources conflict theory argues that the competition of groups and individuals for power and wealth is a fundamental process shaping the social structure. Conflict is manifested through Marx by who gets what and why, Marx argued that the labor market was shaped by class conflict. The capitalist class, which owned the means of production, promoted division of labor to maximize their profits and to disempowered workers.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Religious Experience

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Marx’s challenges to religious experience arguments are sociological; he suggested that the origins of religious experience are to be found in society.…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Emile Durkheim, Karl Marx and Max Weber all offer a wide array of thoughts and ideas regarding to religion. Firstly, Emile Durkheim's views of religion will be explained. Durkheim chose to adopt the idea that if religion gave birth to everything essential in society it is because society is the soul of religion (Cosman, 1973, p. 191). Thus, Durkheim chose to view religion as a function which can strengthen social bonds whilst also integrating individuals into society. Durkheim also believed that religion is divided up into two separate sections – the sacred and the profane. The sacred consisted of rites, behavior or objects of reverence that religious belief deemed special, whilst the profane was deemed as everything and anything else in the world which did not have any religious meaning or function (Giddens 1972, p.243). Both of these categories depend on each other for survival; the sacred cannot survive without the profane to support it and vice versa. Karl Marx chose to adopt a…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The social conflict approach highlights religion’s support of social inequality. According to Karl Marx, religion serves elites by legitimizing the status quo and diverting people’s attention from social inequalities. Today, the British monarch is the formal head of the Church of England, illustrating the close ties between religious and political elites. In practical terms, working for political change may mean opposing the church and god. Religion also encourages people to accept the social problems of the world while looking for a “better world to…

    • 85 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics