Preview

Karl Marx's Arguments Against Communism

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
374 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Karl Marx's Arguments Against Communism
Karl Marx was a communist; he was a part of the ‘’perfect society’’. I am arguing against this because communism is wrong. It’s wrong because the communists can take your property for government purposes, and you can’t do anything about it. If you live in a communist country, you don’t have any rights, which I think is nuts. Marx wrote the Communist Manifesto, which explained his crazy theories. Communists say that religion is suffering and is heartless, and that atheism is natural and more believable.
Karl Marx says everybody should be equal, yet the communist leaders are treated better than their own people. Another reason Karl Marx was wrong was because he supported labor, which I think is good but the communists put no work into supporting

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    From a Christian perspective Marxist communism failed because it denied anything and everything about God or there even being any type of god. There was a real sense of atheistic aspects with in Marxist communism. As a Christian we know that anything without God means nothing at all and will end up failing miserably. Marxism was very controlling when it came to religious beliefs of any type. They closely monitored and control anything religious which didn’t sit well with the people and pushed people to resist the rules. According to Stapleford, “Certainly communism, except in recalcitrant Cuba and North Korea, is dead” (2009, page…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx’s plan for reforming society may be more tangible than Kuyper’s, but his plan uses rather cruel and destructive tactics. For instance, Marx believes that the family has become an instrument of oppression and should be eliminated. Marx’s plan for consolidating the family directly contradicts biblical principles and is no less than an attempt to undermine God’s authority. Marx believes the family is merely a product of the class system and not a God ordained institution. Besides Marx’s cruel elimination of the family, his plan further feeds man’s greed and selfishness. Communism’s prohibition of private property claims to produce economic equality. However, this notion seems only to further feed man unhealthy relationship with the material world and denies God his rightful place of power. Without God’s moral authority, man is left to reshape society as he sees fit but at the cost of losing all that is good. After examining Marx argument, the idea of communism does not seem to present an effective solution for resolving poverty in either Marx’s day or in the twenty-first…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kuyper Perspective Although several of his augments complimentary to Kuyper’s, Marx’s methods for ending poverty are extremely different. Marx views the French Revolution as a positive event and advocates the distribution of property and the abolishment of the family structure. These radical ideas suggest that he possesses a distorted understanding of human nature. Moreover, Marx’s Communism completely disregards God’s authority and places man’s reason at the center of his worldview. Christians should abstain from embracing these ideas as they are based primarily on scientific reasoning without the support of biblical principles.…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Communism is a type of socialism and socialism is based around the idea of the states being owner of their means of production. Communism is based upon the ideology of Marxism. Marxism criticized Christianity by claiming that it was untrue because it took the side of the wealthy oppressors (Shelley 2008). The movement that we know as communism today was started by Vladimir Ilich Ulyanov know as Lenin. Lenin believed that violence was Marxism’s ultimate weapon (Shelley 2008). The theory that came from these two men’s ideas coming together was the Marxist-Leninist theory which claimed “Christianity is an illusory reflection of the world resulting from class divisions” (Shelley 2008). Communism was about not letting society become classless because Lenin believed that religion would take away the power of government and to him that could not…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Karl Marx and his developed theory of Marxism played a vital role in influencing Lenin’s efforts to overthrow the Provisional Government eventually leading to the Russian Revolution of 1917.…

    • 2030 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Those unfamiliar with Karl Marx, the egalitarian normative theorist insists that the “first phase of communist society the economy will distribute goods according to the norm, to each according to his labor contribution” (Arneson 56). Basically, Marx is stating that a society should satisfy its people by creating a form of equal opportunity, and yet those who cannot contribute or do not have the proper skill in contributing cannot be rewarded, thus making this type of society defective. With regards to this, Marx discarded this norm and claimed that if the communist society is attained by higher phase, then the society can eventually “move beyond the sphere of bourgeois right altogether and operate according to the norm, from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs” (Arneson 56). Marx’s is presenting how equality can be achieved if one is able to contribute anything according to his or her…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Communist Manifesto, written by Karl Marx is an economical and philosophical ideology that is centered on communism. Specifically, it is centered on the redistribution of wealth so that everyone in a specified nation or State is completely equal in wealth for the “betterment” of the society. This in theory eliminates the class system and as a result is intended to eliminate the oppression that comes along with the class separation and wage gap. Thankfully, for me this literary piece’s brilliance does not come simply from Marx’s economic ideals but instead it comes from the simple fact that it exists at all. What challenges me and forces me to strive towards betterment is that the Communist Manifesto serves as a reminder to me that it is…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Communists are different from other socialist parties because their main focus lies solely on the common interests of all workers in general and not the sole interests of any kind of single national movement. They appreciate the forces of history that have pushed the progress of their class and has helped lead the proletariat to fulfill their destiny. As Marx says, "The immediate aim of the Communists is the same as that of all other proletarian parties: formation of the proletariat into a class, overthrow of the bourgeois supremacy, conquest of political power by the proletariat" (95). What Marx offered the working man sounded like a dream to them. He offered them free education for all children in government schools. Abolition of children's factory labor. The idea of a parent’s children…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Communism was the end result of Marx's beliefs. That you were a Marxist if you agreed with what he said and communism was what you all worked to achieve. He believed in the uniting of the working class or proletariat as a whole and that their immediate goals were "formation of the proletariat into a class, overthrow of the bourgeois supremacy, conquest of political power by the proletariat." (Marx 66) to achieve these…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Karl Marx, the struggle between the upper class, the bourgeoisie and the lower class, the proletariat, has always been a constant conflict throughout history. The bourgeoisie controlled all means of production and continuously oppressed the proletariat, which was unfair because the proletariats were the ones doing hard labor, yet the bourgeoisie gained all of the benefits. Marx believed that in order to end this class struggle, class distinctions would need to be eliminated. In order for everybody in society to be considered equal, there could be no private ownership of materials. If private ownership of materials were allowed, then some people would have more things than other people which would create another class and thus another conflict. Therefore, an equalized society would get rid of all conflict. Marxism has been…

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Benjamin Franklin once said, “It is easier to be critical than to be correct.” Marx, in his Proletarian and Communist part of the Communist Manifesto takes in criticism towards the Bourgeois with sarcasm to convey that what the Bourgeois is claiming is to be right is wrong according to Marx. What Marx says in his Communist Manifesto might not be entirely true, but he uses certain techniques to convince the people that what he is asserting is right. That is the power of ethos. Proletarian and Communist of the Manifesto Communist is claiming that the Bourgeois principle of a free trade and private ownership of property is destroying the society that we are currently living in. What is very interesting about the Communist Manifesto is that it…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The determination of whether you write a problem statement or a needs assessment may hinge more on the funder’s priorities than your own passion for the project. Either way, the same information will be stated either as a reduction of what is currently a problem or an enhancement of a need to be added to a current situation.…

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Span of control is refers to the number of direct reports a manager has. In other words it states the number of employees can a manager efficiently and effectively manage. The optimal numbers of subordinates supervised by a single executive is 5 to 6 in an average firm. It is importantly to note that managers that have more than six subordinates would soon lose track of what is going on in the organisation. Therefore the number of direct reports a manager can handle depends on the nature of the work being supervised, how visible the performance of subordinates is and the extent of decentralisation within an organisation. Generally, if the work performed by subordinates is routine then the performance of subordinates is visible and easy to measure,…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “This is not acceptable, this is not normal. We’re the only developed country on Earth where this happens and it happens now once a week and it’s a one-day story” (as qtd. in Kemp). Barack Obama, as well as the residents of the once top-notch country of America have witnessed in disgust the well-known, unfortunate phenomenon that has faced the nation since the eighteenth century, school shootings. School violence is arguably one of the most controversial topics in America, mostly because the causes and methods of prevention are debated frequently.…

    • 2232 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Communist Manifesto

    • 513 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the reading, the communist manifesto, Marx talks about ten main points on how to turn our society into a communist society. The first point that Marx makes I do not agree with. I think that his first point means that the government can come in and take someone’s land that they own. I don’t think that anyone should be able to just randomly decide that they get to take your property away from you. I do not agree with the second point he makes either. People who are not as wealthy as others already struggle to afford things that their family needs. If the taxes heavily increase it will make it that much harder on families who already struggle. Increasing taxes not only affects the people who are considered poor but it also affects everyone else as well. The third point that Marx states I also do not agree with. If you are supposed to receive something from inheritance then you should get it. When someone passes away and leaves particular things to someone their wishes should be honored. I both agree and disagree with the fourth point that he makes. If emigrants or rebels own land and they are doing illegal things on it or with it then I believe that the land should be able to be taken away. If they are using it for good purposes like to build shelter or grow food then I believe they should be able to keep it. Marx’s fifth point I don’t believe that it would be a good idea. With a single person running a big corporation like that could make any decision they want, which can be bad. When there is a group of people who own a corporation they have to take a vote on big decisions. I believe that Marx’s sixth point can be good and bad. The state paying for transportation can be a good thing, but what happens when they run out of money? I don’t think the state could afford to pay for so many people flying on planes, or any form of transportation like that. The seventh point Marx…

    • 513 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays