Preview

Keep Our Water Clean: Clean Water Act

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1015 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Keep Our Water Clean: Clean Water Act
Keep Our Water Clean: Clean Water Act

The Clean Water Act has made advances to our society that have helped our environment to flourish with life. The objective of the Act when it was enacted in 1972 was to restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the Nation's water. This objective was accompanied by other statutory goals to eliminate the discharge of pollutants into waters used by boats by 1985 and to attain waters deemed "fishable or swimmable" by 1983. So far, the Act has done exactly what it was meant to do. Its purpose is being served and we our benefiting with clean water.

No where in the context of the Clean Water Act does it say anything about respecting the convenience of businesses wishing to dump their toxins into our waters. The Act was not meant to please everyone, but it was meant to clean our water, and that should please a wide majority. We should not have to sacrifice our health for a business that does nothing for us. Clean water is much more of a priority to us citizens than is the well being of a company that we probably have never heard of and never will.

If the Clean Water Act Amendments of 1995 are passed, all that we have worked for since 1972 will be lost. It will take all of the advances made to clean our water and totally reverse them. This bill will take apart the National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System, leaving loopholes for businesses desiring to pollute our waters. This bill also demonstrates a flagrant disregard for the state of scientific and technological knowledge in the area of water quality. It will corrupt our water in such a way as to totally abolish the Clean
Water Act, rendering it obsolete.

The intent of the of the Clean Water Act Amendments of 1995 is to increase flexibility on businesses, States, local governments, and landowners.
This increase in flexibility is meant to relax some regulations dealing with the discharge of wastes and stormwater into waterways, authority of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Since this act has been set in motion millions of Americans have been able to…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The vast majority of California's water infrastructure was constructed during the Great Depression era. In fact, most pipes were put underground in three phases – in the late 1800's, the 1930's and shortly after World War II (AWWA, 2015). The general problem is our failing water infrastructure that is breaking down across the nation at an alarming rate. Consequently, the specific problem is leaky water pipes are having contaminants filtering into our drinking systems, leading to illnesses and disease outbreaks (Amwater, 2014).…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lake Erie Research Paper

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The cleanup was addressed in this paragraph. In 1972 congress passed a clean water act, they tightened dumping regulation. The same year Canada and the United States signed the great lakes to prevent pollution getting in the waterways of the great lakes. The city improved its sewer system and monitor water quality.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Module 5 drew upon the needs and desires of people in society. The module explored who, if anyone, would be responsible for meeting the wants of the human population. Currently, water is a crucial natural resource for people everywhere. However, our water supply is decreasing due to many factors. In exploring this dilemma module 5 raises questions such as Who will be entitled to water when supplies become scarce? In the text, Facing the Fresh Water Crisis, Rodgers claimed that the exponential water consumption will eventually degrade all ecosystems on Earth. In response to the question raised by module 5 Rodgers argued that current technologies can avert a water war between societies. He takes a preventive…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Water: We need to be concerned about water pollution as well as about the increasing scarcity of drinkable water in this world.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Cloning

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Polluted water causes more diseases to spread and makes it harder to control. Also there won't be much…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Clean Water In Texas

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This in turn filtered faster through the ground water of San Antonio and actually helped sustain the local populace (Siedenburg 699). As less limestone “clogging” and other pollutants didn’t inhibit the production of more clean groundwater. The Clean Water Act of 1970 is also at risk, due to corporations demanding it to be unconstitutional, as it inhibited their right to dump in public water systems (Siedenburg 699). It also has been obstructed by the Federal Government by receding information to the public. This is a problem as San Antonio and most Texans are growing increasingly dependent on aquifers and groundwater. With the lack of information and a possible referendum of the bill, there may be a possible water shortage.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    that they get could possibly result in death. Having cleaner water will also make the environment…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Tourism – building hotels, need a lot of water, lower the (8)WATER TABLE AND CAUSE SALINISATION (getting more salty) .…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The United States should care about this situation because it could be the reason it’s affecting our weather as well. The rivers that are being affected in China could affect our oceans. By affecting our oceans we wouldn’t be able to do certain things like trade and enjoy them in the summer. Also it could affect our health if that water was to be transferred to here. The polluted water in China could travel to other parts of the world causing more and more water to be polluted then there won’t be any good water for us to use.…

    • 226 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Clean Water Act of 1977

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Throughout the many years of existence of the United States national government, there have been numerous bills, policies, etc that have gone through the legislative process in Congress. Some of them were lucky or important enough to pass, however others were not so fortunate. Now one bill in particular that is of significance in the United States and that was fortunate enough to pass was The Clean Water Act of 1977. Such a bill that results in an essential part or our everyday lives today is clean and uncontaminated water. The beaches we go and swim in, the lakes we go fishing in, the sewage cleanup and the drinking water we intake is all due in part to this Clean Water Act. It is because of these common everyday uses in our nation today, that I am going to discuss how it became a law.…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federal Water Pollution Control Act (FWPCA) strengthened regulatory framework to respond to an oil spills and to establish requirements for the prevention of pollution. The purpose of the law is the prohibition of discharge of oil and hazardous substances in the areas of the navigable waterways of the United States in dangerous quantities (p.10). The law clearly prescribed credentials of the federal government, established a national program to respond to an emergency and organized special teams to support the actions of the federal coordinator. The law was designed to complete the cleaning of water, where…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Water Quality Standards

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Water quality standards are determined by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) which has the responsibility to carry out the goal to restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the nation’s waters. Water quality pollutants such as pesticides, cleaning solvents, and detergents are found in water due to the activities of humans. Other pollutants such as nutrients and sediments are a problem only under certain conditions. Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCL) is enforceable under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA). Drinking water standards are much stricter on the safety of water. Due to the risk of cancer the MCL was lowered to 10 L from 50L because 50L was too high. If these pollutants are not filtered out of the water they can cause harm to the plants, animals, and human bodies. EPA has to approve the safety of the water before it can be used. According to EPA 92% of the people in the U.S. have access to drinking water that meets the drinking water standards. However over 42,000 rivers, lakes, and estuaries are not meeting the recommended water quality standards. The major problems with these waters are pathogens, mercury, nutrients, other heavy metals, sediments, and oxygen depletion.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Corporations are expected to act with some form of human decency. They should act as if they were decent human beings, but they fail to act in this manner because of their never ending mission for more…

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Clean water act

    • 353 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Clean Water Act (CWA) is the primary federal law in the United States governing water pollution. Passed in 1972, the act established the goals of eliminating releases of high amounts of toxic substances into water, eliminating additional water pollution by 1985, and ensuring that surface waters would meet standards necessary for human sports and recreation by 1983. Pollutants regulated under the CWA include "priority" pollutants, including various toxic pollutants; "conventional" pollutants, such as biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), total suspended solids (TSS), fecal coliform, oil and grease, and pH; and "non-conventional" pollutants, including any pollutant not identified as either conventional or priority. The CWA regulates both direct and indirect discharges. In order to carry out the purpose of this Act, any water quality standard applicable to interstate waters which was adopted by any State and submitted to, and approved by, or is awaiting approval by, the Administrator pursuant to this Act as in effect immediately prior to the date of enactment of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972, shall remain in effect unless the Administrator determined that such standard is not consistent with the applicable requirements of this Act as in effect immediately prior to the date of enactment of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972. If the Administrator makes such a determination he shall, within three months after the date of enactment of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972, notify the State and specify the changes needed to meet such requirements. If such changes are not adopted by the State within ninety days after the date of such notification, the Administrator shall promulgate such changes in accordance with subsection of this section. Despite public indifference and worry about the threat that new environmental regulations pose to a struggling economy, Democrats in D.C. are charging ahead.…

    • 353 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays