Preview

Kevin Rudd

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1205 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Kevin Rudd
On Wednesday, 13 February 2008, the Federal Parliament of Australia was filled with hundred of parliamentarians and the representatives of the Indigenous community. The 26th Australian Prime Minister, Kevin Michael Rudd who is an English - Irish man, astonishing and surprising the whole of Australian citizens by delivering a speech entitled ‘Sorry’. He received a standing ovation as he entered the hall before he delivered his remarkable speech. His speech is an official apology on behalf of the Australian government to the Aboriginals, but in particular it is directed to the stolen generation.

Between the year of 1910 and 1970, over 100.000 children were forcibly taken from their Aboriginal parents. They were either raised in foster families or adopted by white parents. Most of them were the children under the age of five and they are known as the Stolen Generation. They were taken from their own parents through the Australian government assimilation policies. Aboriginal people had no right to be entitled to any part of Australia, even though they had lived before the white people came which led to the result, they do not get their proper place in life. The aim of them doing so, is because Australian government doubted the skills of the Aboriginal parents in raising their kids well and highly educated. Forty years from now, the Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd admitted and explained about what happened. The stolen generation has been a cultural phenomenon and common thing to the Australian citizens back then. In the speech, Rudd specifically refers and mention to the stolen generation, which was aimed at thousand of aboriginal children who were forced to separate from their families and handed over to the Whites to be raised instead.

The strength of the speech is seen when Rudd was sincerely apologizing due to the misunderstanding that had been done previously by the Australian citizens. Indirectly, he also admitted the mistakes that had been done in the



References: Cockcroft, R & Cockcroft SM 2005, Persuading people: an introduction to rhetoric, 2nd edition, Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke, Hampshire. Dlugan, A. 2010, ‘ what is Pathos and Why is it critical for speakers? ‘. Six minutes and presentation skills, viewed 4 October 2011, . Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M 1980, ‘Metaphors We Live By Chicago’, University of Chicago Press. Lewis, G, & Slade C 1994, ‘Critical Communication’, Language in Context, Sydney: Prentice Hall, pp.25-49. Rudd, K 2008, ‘ Apology to Australia’s indigenous peoples ‘, Wednesday 13 February 2008, Parliament of Australia, viewed 4 October 2011, Stiff, J. B 1994, ‘Persuasive communication’, New York: Guilford Press. Wood, JT 2009, Communication in Our Lives, Wadsworth, USA.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Brennan keenly incorporates former Australian Prime Minister and former leader of the Labor Party, Julia Gillard’s speech on the anniversary of Kevin Rudd’s National apology statement. Brennan acknowledged that her dialogue was indeed the truth and seemed sentimental enough that it would in way resonate with his intended audience. Gillard posed a series of truthful questions that Brennan believed exemplified the essence of his discussion: “How do we share this land on what terms? How adequate are our … laws … to express our history …? No gesture speaks more deeply to the healing of our nation’s fabric than amending our nation’s founding character” (Brennan, cited in Gillard 2013). By providing evidence through respected sources, Brennan is able to explore the context of what is he is trying to relay (having a renewed referendum) in a more respected yet persuading manner. Brennan also makes judgement on parliaments Joint Select Committee report on the how the government can develop a successful referendum. This factual evidence combined with his own subjective opinion enhances the evidence used in the…

    • 971 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Faith Bandler's Speech

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This speech is important and crucial to highlight the persisting flaw that still prevents the Aboriginal people and white Australian nation from reconciling and ultimately focuses on advancing towards this reconciliation. Bandler’s speech is important to society because the Aboriginal people were the original founding fathers of this nation, who had their society torn up by the “terra nullius” theory and white man dominance. So it is only fair that the Aboriginal society be offered a voice and support throughout their hardship,…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is my absolute pleasure to stand here and address the members of the House of Representatives for 2015. I am here to commemorate 40 years since the dismissal of the Whitlam Labor government in 1975, but specifically highlight and celebrate the major impacts of Whitlam’s government. Whether you agree that Gough Whitlam should have remained in leadership or have been dismissed, you cannot deny the significant impacts his policies had. Gough Whitlam and his government stated to the public of Australia that their program had three great aims, ‘they are: to promote equality, to involve the people of Australia in the decision-making processes of our land, and to liberate the talents and uplift the horizons of the Australian people.’ To achieve this, the Labor Government introduced new policies, which impacted all…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gough Whitlam

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gough Whitlam became Australia’s Prime minister on the 5th of December in 1972 campaigning the slogan “It’s Time”. Whitlam and his government the Labor Party the 1st one after more than two decades promised electors an ambitious package of major reform policies. These included an immediate end to Australia’s involvement in Vietnam War and an end to military conscription as well as criminal execution, Free university, A national health scheme, Aboriginal land rights, women’s rights and family law. All These Major Reform Policies were accomplished throughout his less than three years in office as Australia’s Prime minister. Edward Gough Whitlam arrived in the position keen to bring about a number of reforms and a new, progressive approach to the Australian national identity.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This argument analysis examines the article Recognise What? Problems with the campaign for constitutional recognition (Maddison, 2017). Published in the May/June issue of the Indigenous Law Bulletin, Maddison describes the process to recognise Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders as the first people of Australia in the constitution. The article explains this process through several accounts, resistance to the campaign and the role of the ‘Recognise’ campaign. Throughout the article, Maddison argues that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders should be recognised as the first people of Australia while acknowledging the problems with the campaign. The analysis will identify the main claims, evidence used to support these claims and the assumptions made by the author. Maddison uses several forms of evidence to support her 3 main claims and the underlying assumptions.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Mabo Decision

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages

    However, the initial announcement of the apology caused a split in the Liberal party, as some believed that it would create a guilty culture in Australia. Yet, Judi Moylan, who was the former Liberal Minister, said “I think as a nation we owe an apology. We shouldn't be thinking about it as an individual apology — it's an apology that is coming from the nation state because it was governments that did these things.” The apology was then considered necessary. At 9:30 on the day of the speech, Kevin Rudd began the apology. “...The time has now come for the nation to turn a new page in Australia's history by righting the wrongs of the past and so moving forward with confidence to the future. We apologise for the laws and policies of successive parliaments and governments that have inflicted profound grief, suffering and loss on these our fellow Australians. We apologise especially for the removal of ATSI children from their families, their communities and their country...We the parliament of Australia respectfully request that this apology be received in the spirit in which it is offered as part of the healing of the nation….” The speech was a significant moment in ATSI peoples lives, as, according the to The Bringing Them Home Report, this was the first step to healing and was largely symbolic and important in ATSI…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Noel Pearson

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Noel Pearson’s speech, ‘An Australian History for us All,’ explores the divides between our community and the issues that prevent us as a nation from achieving reconciliation. Ultimately, throughout his exordium Pearson is excessively humble, ‘it is my honour to have been invited… Alas, I cannot promise my teacher’s rigour ,’ this diminution of his prominent political position equalises Pearson with his audience. He successfully characterises himself as being selflessly modest, a successful tool in capturing our attention, his choice to do this in the exordium is also an example of kairos, his appealing attitude is naturally attractive, guaranteeing our fixated attention throughout the duration of his speech. Pearson additionally employs a variety of quotes to both enforce his credibility and portray society’s ignorant attitude towards reconciliation. We see this when he quotes Professor Bill Stanner, the ‘Great Australian Silence,’ becomes a metaphor of our refusal to address the Aboriginal struggle on a national level, objectifying the Australian nation as absent minded. Furthermore, Pearson makes noticeable appeals to pathos and logos, encouraging an emotional and logical response identifiable by all of us. Pearson in his battle for reconciliation, provides syllogistic reasoning and structure on solving the inherent ‘guilt’ issue, ‘it is not about guilt. It is about opening our hearts a little bit… and to have an open and generous heart…means that when you acknowledge the wrongs of the past, you might try to do so ungrudgingly… there must be some respect for that.’ Additionally, the inclusive pronouns that Pearson employs in this statement make his proposed solution exclusive, applying to both indigenous and non indigenous peoples as such he unites his audience, generating logos through the universal nature and structural flow of his statement. Additionally, Pearson goes on to compare the reasoning he provides to the internationally notorious issue of Jewish…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Australia’s attitude towards the rights and freedoms of Aboriginals has changed drastically from 1920 to the present. It is evident that Australia has made a greater effort throughout the years, to bridge the gap between the rights and of Aboriginals and the rest of Australia. This has been improved by the implementation of different policies such as the Protection policy, Assimilation, Integration, Self Determination and Reconciliation.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Paul Keating

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A key achievement in Paul Keating’s leadership was the recognition of Indigenous Australian’s rights and acknowledging their position in society. Keating established a Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation, working alongside Aboriginal Australians, which sought to implement different strategies to ameliorate the injustices. In June 1992 the High Court recognised Aboriginal land rights by making a decision that native title existed in the Mabo case. Keating supported this notion and delivered the Redfern Speech in December 1992, apologising for the wrongdoings of white society and recognising Aboriginal rights. This was a significant moment and is still recognised today because it was the first time in Australian history that the government attempted to reconcile the relationship with Indigenous Australians. Today, people reflect on this speech and can still find areas that need to be improved upon to ensure an equal society.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Changing Australia Day’s date would help strengthen the broken bonds between Indigenous Australians and white Australians. On 13 February 2008, Former Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd apologised to all Indigenous Australians…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Module B Speeches

    • 1177 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In his speech, Noel Pearson addresses the need to acknowledge the past mistreatment of Australian Aboriginals. As an Indigenous Australian politician, Pearson gave his speech at the Chancellor’s Club Dinner in the University of Western Sydney to advance equality of Aborigines. Pearson quickly introduces his purpose, “our popular understanding of the colonial past is central to the moral and political turbulence we are still grappling with as Australians”. The illustrative use of turbulence is used to highlight the prevalence of past disharmonies and he uses the inclusive pronoun “we” as a synecdoche for all Australians to unify the audience. By directly quoting authorities such as John Howard and Bill Stanner, Pearson supplements his ethos and strengthens his case by evaluating both sides of the situation. The metaphor, “cult of forgetfulness” has negative connotations in order to challenge the common social mindset regarding the recognition of the past and induce a desire for change. Pearson effectively uses a cumulative list, “You have taken from us not just our land and not just all of the icons of Indigenous Australia…” to illustrate past injustices. The diction is divisive between Indigenous and European Australians, but deliberate emphasis is placed on the past tense to suggest hope for the future. Thus Pearson…

    • 1177 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Paul Keating

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages

    -> commemorate those who have died and those who have served for Australia in field of conflict…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many Australians associate and put emphasis on the idea of reconciliation between indigenous Australians and non indigenous Australians with the federal governments formal reconciliation policy in 1991. However the events of symbolic reconciliation play an equal part if not more significant part of this reconciliation process by bridging the 'gap' between indigenous people and non indigenous people of Australia both in past and present times. Without these fundamental symbolic events of reconciliation it can be argued that the federal governments formal reconciliation policy and other practical reconciliation efforts may have never eventuated. This concept is elucidated in the text which not only highlights the value of these symbolic reconciliation…

    • 1430 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We reflect in particular on the mistreatment of those who were Stolen Generations - this blemished chapter in our nation's history. He displays to those who have been affected by the Stolen Generation that the whole of Australia are truly sorry for the events that occurred during that infamous period of time. But the whole sorry speech is about what happened during that time. The Sorry Speech includes many key elements, but the main message Mr Rudd is trying to get through is that it is our job as a nation to recognise and mourn what previous governments did not. Mr Rudd took responsibility and took the first step in ensuring that all citizens of Australia whether aboriginal or not should be treated equally and fairly in the present and in the future. A good example of a text is The Rabbits.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Beginning in 1910 and ending in the 1970s, Australians Federal and State government agencies and church missions made a policy to forcibly take many aboriginal and Torres Strait children away from their families in an attempt to destroy the Aboriginal race and culture. There was an impact on the aboriginals with a particular policy the Australian Government had introduced, which was the policy of ‘Assimilation’. This policy was to encourage many Aboriginal people to give up their culture, language, tradition, knowledge and spirituality to basically become white Australians. Unfortunately this policy didn’t give the Aboriginals the same rights as white Australians, as a result of discrimination, aboriginals were moved to live in special housing…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays