Keystone Pipeline Research Paper

Already, there is a Keystone Pipeline in existence, which runs from fields of oil sand starting in Canada to the U.S. The Keystone XL Pipeline 2,000 long would be an expansion of this, causing somewhat of an economic issue regarding employment and that would only be the beginning of many issues. TransCanada is the company that has been striving for this project to begin; A connection to Cushing, Oklahoma where there is currently an oil jam to the Gulf Coast of Texas, where the destination of oil refiners’ are located. The other new add-on would be from Alberta to Kansas passing through Montana (Bakken Shale region) and North Dakota; these places have a large amount of oil being extracting and through the process with take on this crude as a
According to the Tar Sand Blockade, NASA’s leading climate scientist, Dr. James Hansen has called the Keystone XL pipelines “a fuse to the largest carbon bomb on the planet.” Hansen has said that if all the carbon stored in the Canadian tar sands is released into the earth’s atmosphere it would mean “game over” for the planet. Global warming is caused by the amount of carbon and greenhouse gas emissions right to the atmosphere, raising the level of the sea, weather will be wild depending on where you live; hurricanes, floods, heat waves, forest fires and there will be extinction of cretin species. The dependence on fossil fuels and oil will grow, making many problems and along with animal agriculture for livestock profits there will be destruction on this planet. There are dead zones in the sea, way less trees in forests and now sanctuaries of green lands can and will be ruined. TransCanada seems to be hesitant towards what exact chemicals are going through these pipes within the oil. Not much good can come from
If I were president of course I would deny this notion. Although trains run on oil they can also transport oil, they can always stop transportation for any reason necessary, and it can be permanent but at least it wont corrupt the ground below us. The pollution is a problem already so I don’t see why there needs to be an, add on to it from the carbon emissions. In order to help this planet there has to be different ways for these gases that sound be natural to go up in our atmosphere. Now with all the analysis research TransCanada had done they basically state that this wouldn’t have a significant effect on climate change, and I think that’s not true so a train would be more sufficient. See, you’d be surprised to find out that livestock, water usage, deforestation, waste, extinction of species and land use all causes an effect on climate change. No one thinks that if you stop eating meat you’re helping this planet but it’s the sweetest truth there is. 1 hamburger is the equivalent to 660 gallons of water, which is the same amount as one individual showering for 2 months. No body really understands that although 13% of global greenhouse gas emissions come from transportation like roads, rails, air, marine, 51% is due to livestock and their byproducts. There are