Born on August 8th, conjoined twins Mary and Jodi, struggle to live their lives due to the problems Mary is trying to overcome. These twins were born joined at the circular pelvis, one of the twins (Mary), has a useless heart along with lungs that don’t function and an underdeveloped brain. The other twin (Jodie) is glimmering and very much alert, Mary depends on Jodie’s lungs and brain and sooner or later Jodie will have heart failure that will kill them both in six months. The debate raises, Kill Mary or save Jodie? I agree with the parents in that, deciding to let one of their daughters go is a big deal and must take quite the emotional toll on them. When the parents found out both of the girls could not possibly be saved they called off the surgery saying, “We could not possibly agree to any surgery being undertaken that will kill one of our daughters” (Parents of Mary and Jodie, J.F.O. Mcallister). The parents have a very reasonable explanation as to why this surgery should not take place because, no parent ever wants to let one of their babies go, especially having to pick one to live. In the belief that taking the life of one of the babies is absurd, it would be a more prominent decision to let the surgery take place and at least give one baby the chance to live. Mary could be viewed as a kind of unjust aggressor, sapping Jodie’s lifeblood to the point of killing her, thus entitling Jodie to self defense (Judge at hearing, J.F.O. Mcallister). The judge arguing that this could be an aggression towards Jodie is a little crazy, but he puts up a good point because he knows what the right thing is to do, and that is to detach Mary and Jodie. This argument of moving forward with the surgery is correct in that no one deserves to waste away because the parents aren’t strong enough to make a decision. Why is it okay to sit there and watch one babies suffer tremendously while the other one lays there getting the life sucked out of her, it is not ethical. Let Jodie live a relatively normal life? Or must they do nothing to harm Mary and stand by while both certainly die (J.F.O. Mcallister)? Mcallister brings up a good point, is it healthier to watch both of your twin babies die and have to share that story or to let the suffering one go and have at least one of your babies to hold and get to share the story of how she lived. In my opinion sitting back and watching two humans die when you know it’s possible to save one it is ridiculous and a selfish way to think.
Works Cited
Mcallister, J.F.O. “Kill Mart to Save Jodie?” Ethics. Time, 18 September 2000.
Cited: Mcallister, J.F.O. “Kill Mart to Save Jodie?” Ethics. Time, 18 September 2000.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
I also feel that Sarah’s doctors should’ve suggested this option to the Health and Human Services before they suggested it to Sarah’s parents because they now gave Sarah’s parents hope in the one place hope should not be given because these doctors cannot be 100% sure that the transplant or any transplant will be successful but because they told the parents they are confident they encouraged the parents to take on Health and Human Services.…
- 1267 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Should Mary face punishment for her wrong doing? Of course not. I’m not agreeing that murder is okay, because it most definitely is not. In Mary’s defense, her husband, whom she loved, was happily married to, and pregnant with their baby, came home and announced to her that he was leaving. I can’t blame her because she was overwhelmed at the time. Mr. Maloney could have at least prepared her for this moment. With him leaving, it meant that Mary was going to face a lot of responsibilities…
- 324 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
They didn't think it would be a great idea because what would happen to the baby during this time or her. During her childhood she went through many hardships. She had to deal with being beat or called names and her parents lived even worse. Her parents were proud of her for standing up for herself but didn't like the idea of her going to jail because her baby and they would have to bail her out and they might have been more of a target. But that wasn’t so they still lived the same life.…
- 520 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
During the surgery, Edelin stated that he had a difficult time cutting through the abdominal wall in which extended the surgery time. Once the fetus was out of the womb, Edelin declared the fetus had dead in the womb. Which would not be considered manslaughter of a viable baby because the fetus was not alive outside of the womb. If the fetus was alive outside of the womb, Edelin would have had to do everything he could to save the baby on the grounds of it defeating the purpose of his oath he took as a doctor. Consequently by law, Edelin would have been convicted of Manslaughter if the baby was not saved.…
- 761 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The fault should not fall on any one party, but on how each party treated each other. They treated each other with ignorance and noncompliance without acknowledging others’ beliefs or traditions. If the fault were to fall an anyone, it should fall on both parties because the doctors failed to acknowledge the Lees beliefs, and the Lees failed to acknowledge the doctors’ traditions. In a place where a child’s life is at danger, people should not be disagreeing on what to do because it only makes it harder to choose what to do for the child. Instead, they should be trying to communicate and come to a consensus with each other so that they understand each other’s intentions and find a common…
- 432 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
They want to let their children be in the hands of God. The first premise, or argument is that the girl’s parents believe that every human life is inimitably sacred. The second premise is that by sacrificing one twin’s life, does not respect that sanctity of the other twin’s life. Thus, the conclusion of the parent’s argument is that it is morally and religiously wrong to sacrifice one twin’s life in order to save the other. In the court transcript, it is stated by the parents that they did not have the financial means to provide for Jodie if she survived (Jones, 2001). They also stated that there were no appropriate facilities to care for the surviving sister on the island of Gonzo. That means that Jodie would have to move to England to attend proper facilities and be left alone with no one to care for her (Jones, 2001). Ultimately, it is wrong to sacrifice one’s life because every human life is…
- 599 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
When hearing of the kidney transplant, Kate wants Anna to do something about it. She is sick of fighting cancer, sick of waiting around for relapse, and sick of being a burden to Anna ☺. Anna and Kate decide to hire a lawyer, Campbell Alexander, and file for medical emancipation. Both Kate and Anna are thankful for this choice even though it puts Kate’s life in danger. The case goes to court, and ultimately the judge’s verdict is in her favor. Their parents think that even though Anna should have a choice in what she does with her body, she is obligated to save her sister because that is what a family does. Because the kidney causes great controversy, it plays a major role in the plot and meaning of the story. The kidney symbolizes quality of life versus the sanctity of life: “—but at this point the sanctity of Kate’s existence has become completely intertwined with the quality of Anna’s life” (Picoult 408). Everyone knows that Anna would give Kate her kidney, no questions asked. The judge, Campbell, and Anna just think she should still have the right to make that decision since it is regarding the quality of her life. If Anna gives her sister the kidney, both would have many risks when undergoing surgery. Kate will not have the chance to live without Anna’s kidney, therefore, expunging her sanctity of life. The kidney has the power to do a lot of saving, but whom it saves is up to…
- 1069 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Anencephaly is a brain defect that inhibits the complete formation of the brain and the skull during pregnancy. This disease has no cure and the life expectancy is very low since there is only function of vital organs like the heart and the lungs (provided by their brain stem) for only a limited time. Its causes are unknown but it is believed that it is caused by environmental and genetic factors, as well as the lack of intake of folic acid by the pregnant mothers. The shortage of organ donors today has come to raise the proposal of using anencephalic infants as organ sources in order to save the lives of children who may have the opportunity to live. Although, it has been debated through the years that using anencephalic infants as organ sources may not be an ethical or legal practice as demanded in the “dead donor” rule, it is still a very controversial issue on whether it is preferable to give a better quality of life to this infant or to provide the opportunity to live to another child.…
- 3136 Words
- 13 Pages
Powerful Essays -
It is their own body and should be able to decide what happens to it. In the post-Roe era, many pro-choice advocates are trying to defend the law and explain why they approve of this by “talking about women’s rights, sexuality, and abortion.” 2(p10) One reason why a mother-to-be might have an abortion is that they might not be financially stable to have this child. Another reason why they might decide not to have their child is if they know their child would be in a vegetable state for the rest of their life. However, these are not good enough reasons to have an abortion. Even though the mother might not be able to take care of the child after giving birth, there are many other people in the world that could. Many people are willing to adopt and take care of these kids, especially if they cannot have kids of their own. It is not fair to the child to let the mother decide if they get to live or…
- 1161 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
There are various opinions around this topic due to the ethics around this issue as in some cases it is viewed as inhumane etc. these views include religious views. In this case focusing on the overall view as well as different views from within the Catholic Church, and those from outside the church. There are various arguments around the right of those involved, such as both parents as well as the rights of the unborn child. This in particular relates back to ethics as many consider the unborn fetus to be human, and in that case have its own rights. There is also the great factor that there can be complications involved.…
- 1335 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
The mother had a decision to make and I am guessing that most children would be very thankful that their mother didn’t have an abortion. I think that the constitutional principle of individual rights relates to abortion very well because, like I mentioned before the baby has the individual right. Since the baby has the individual right, it isn’t really up to the mother to choose that for her baby. “We’re all human, aren’t we? Every human life is worth the same, and worth saving” (J.K. Rowling) even though that baby is small and powerless it still deserves our…
- 551 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
By the time the mother even realizes she is pregnant, her baby contains its own set of DNA. In a matter of a few short weeks, the baby has a heartbeat of its own, along with developing organs. At 25 weeks, the baby has regular brain waves and activity. Therefore, the popular argument that a pregnant woman can take the life of her baby because its, “part of her body,” is ridiculous. The baby is its own separate person with its own rights.…
- 500 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Imagine if you were Jocasta, and you had to decide your only child's life. A child you have been waiting to give birth to, a child who will kill his father and bear kids with…
- 711 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Knowing what I now know about PGD, I do not agree with the parent’s choice to “design” Anna to save Kate for numerous reasons. Anna, created in vitro, was “designed” to be a duplication of her sister Kate. Kate had acute promyelocytic leukemia which consequently destroyed her kidneys. She was specifically born to be a willing sufferer for her sister. Anna had no say in whether she wanted to be a store of spare parts for her sister or not. The main reason I disagree with the parent’s choice to “design” Anna is because I believe no person should be forced to sacrifice his or her own body parts. No human should be created specifically for sacrificial reasons. I feel, just as Anna did, that she should have the right to her own body.…
- 1151 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
<br>To the doctor and hospital staff, it is crucial that the girl has the operation, in order to keep to keep her alive. The old-fashioned thinking can be understandable, but I think the grandmother was too stubborn and the mother was a bit unreasonable. They need the doctor's help, yet they refused to listen to him, even to the extent that the hospital had to keep the two women at bay. After the operation, instead of being anxious, the mother demanded, " Well?". This is so ungrateful on the mother's part. If you need the other party's help, you should at least be polite rather than rude.…
- 709 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays