Julius Caesar was Roman’s dictator in Julius Caesar. However, He was popular with the common people because he provided entertainment, reduced their debt, conquered land for Rome, and was charisma.…
To assassinate means, “To kill suddenly or secretively, especially a politically prominent person; murder premeditatedly and treacherously”(dictionary reference 1).. Julius Caesar was born on July 12, 100 BC, and was assassinated by many Roman senators near the theatre of Pompey on the Ides of March, on March 15, 44 BC. Achity explains his assassination by stating that “In the Senate chamber, Antonius is drawn to one side. Then the conspirators crowd about Caesar as if to second a petition for the repealing of an order banishing Publius Cimber. When he refuses the petition, the conspirators attack him, and he falls dead of twenty-three knife wounds” (Atchity 7). The assassination of Julius Caesar was unjust because he was a victorious soldier, and he was a prosperous leader; however, others believe that he was a tyrant.…
Cincinnatus won the war in 13 days. Many people were happy and they asked Cincinnatus to be a dictator for life. Cincinnatus turned down the offer because he knew that having a republic was better that having a dictator. He knew that a dictator could abused their power. Cincinnatus left Rome and continued his life on his farm. One reason Cincinnatus should be recognized as a hero was that he won a war in 13 days. If Cincinnatus did not step in, Rome would be destroyed and many people would have died. Most heroes are pictured as people who win battles and save lives. The second reason that Cincinnatus should be a hero was that he was selfless. Cincinnatus turned down the offer to be a dictator for life because he wanted to help his city instead of himself. He knew that having a republic was better than having a dictator. If Cincinnatus became a dictator, he would have been greedy enough for power. Instead, he turned down the offer and continued his life on his farm. This shows that Cincinnatus was not greedy for power. He puts people in front of himself. He gave up the offer for his city. This shows that Cincinnatus is selfless. Of all the things he did, he should be recognized as a…
Julius Caesar was a Roman dictator. He was a liberal person and supported social programs. He reformed Rome by making the constitutional reforms. He is influential in history because he built an empire.…
Back when the Roman Empire was still in one piece; a man named Julius Caesar, set out to rule it all. The senate of Rome saw Caesar as a threat to their power in the Roman government and, seeing that Caesar was about to become Emperor, they killed him. One question still stands “would Julius Caesar become a ruthless tyrant, or a great ruler of Rome?” , Caesar was a great man. Caesar had a heart for the people of Rome, Providing them with food, jobs, sanitation, and water, as is stated in “Killing Caesar” written by Jon Herman, “The hungry hordes of the city were now given bread.”…
There is a large amount of differences between the play interpretation of Julius Caesar and what really happened. For instance, Brutus in the play was extremely different than real life Brutus. In the play, he was best friends with Caesar-well, until he killed him. However, in real life, Brutus hated Caesar. He was never supportive of Caesar, and truthfully never loved him.(Musaj and Prezi Inc.) In Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, he uses Brutus’s strong love of Rome, his honor, and his willing to do anything for the good of Rome to show that Brutus is the tragic hero.…
Today, rulers of other countries still bear the title Caesar. This name has achieved an unprecedented amount of respect. Julius Caesar is one of Rome's most famous leaders, and he has come to deserve that fame. Julius has many of the discrete characteristics of a leader. He was egotistic (some may say an egomaniac), he had a controlling power, he was intelligent, and he was ambitious. Although his reign did not prove as beneficial to Rome as it did for him, he is still considered a great leader.…
However, Caesar’s character is questionable due to the fact that Caesar did defeat another rules, Pompey, and shows temptation to become Rome’s sole leader (1.2 221-231), which can justify Brutus’ actions of contributing to the murder of Caesar. Caesar did die, however his death was not in his own control. Thus, Caesar does not fit into the definition of a tragic hero.…
The story of Julius Caesar is a time period where Caesar was the noblest men of all of Rome. It's a famous time were there was a lot of tragic events. For example in act 3 scene 1 Cesar is stabbed and killed by the conspirators at the senate. The fall of their King was a tragic event. Also Brutus committing suicide who was also one of the noblest man of Rome. A tragedy is a powerful impact in a story. Which in ties in with a tragic hero who is the main protagonist {character} in the story but they will most likely will not achieve their ends they will most likely die in trying. Brutus in my opinion is a tragic hero in the story of Julius Caesar. Brutus is a character that we learn about who he really is. We learn what his motives is in the…
Caesar was one of the most ambitious and determined men to ever rule the Roman Empire. He became a legend in his own right by defeating his highest political threat at his time, Pompey. Taking Rome by storm, Caesar marched his way to power supported by his loyal army and followers claiming his Dictatorship for life. Changes that he made during his time still remain strong in our time such as the Calendar.…
Everybody "[bows] to Caesar", and they love Caesar, and even offer him the crown (Parenti 5).…
Julius Caesar had many achievements such as his military tactics expanding Rome,his political reign changing Rome to Dictatorship from Republic, and his assassination devastating Rome causing war and allies. Caesar was a very memorable man for Rome and the whole…
Caesar died on March 15, 44 BC, in Rome, Italy. His death was very crucial. Stabbed 23 times, and only one wound was fatal, leading him to his death. This death was an assassination, which was committed by his own senators at a meeting that was held in a hallway next to Pompey’s Theatre. It was thought that Caesar died suffering knowing that the stabbing were very painful. This would be because stab wounds aren't fatal unless punctured through the muscle tissue, which is hard because there are too many things such as rib cage, and arms to block the weapon. There are two theories to caesars fatal stab wound, one he was stabbed in the chest which caused blood to enter the chest cavity. This would cause his lungs to collapse and leading to suffocation.…
1. What is ironic about the timing of Caesar's murder (in relation to the preceding events)?…
Caesar as a leader was a very harsh and a very unmanly man. Caesar was a man who made them fight for his own wars. He had many men battle for. Caesar is also a very non believer. Caesar was part of a very bloody war. He went into battle with his men who he sent their first and they fought in a blood bath. Caesar said he had to do this because there was no other route when really there was. Caesar was not a good man because with this that he did it was bloody and it was not a very good battle for him because many live where lost. This makes me believe that Caesar is a poor leader not caring about his men or caring about the fact if he win or loses. Caesar also didn't care about the fact of the land. If he messed it up so be it. Caesar a poor leader in my eyes.…