There's been quite a controversy in the topic of "killing" and "letting someone die". Just by the word "kill", many will say it's worse to kill a person, for example shooting them than allowing a person to die by say, not providing them with medicine. With this said, this just simply means that it it worse to harm a human being than letting harm happen to them. It's quite hard to weigh which is wrong or which is morally right. It really depends and varies on the situation we're talking about.
According to Holly Smith Goldman, "death is not always an evil to the person who dies. If the continuation of that person's life would have been a good to her, then dead is indeed an evil. But if the continuation of her life would have been an evil, then death for her is a good." With that said, this falls in the category of people who are in excruciating pain due to illness. For example, my grandmother from the Philippines, recently passed away from bone cancer. Throughout her fight with the cancer, she suffered through pain I can't even imagine. Although everyone did their possible best to give her the best care, eventually even with medications, she still suffered greatly. Eventually, the best decision for her was to stop giving her medications. In my opinion, she's been through hell with cancer and I feel that by stopping her medications, this still prolonged her life but also doubled the amount of pain she was in. In this sense, was letting her die better than killing? These two things are not much different in a moral sense. As I mentioned, in some cases where killing will actually set and free the patient, it may be necessary. Most of us will never kill a human being, because that's just against our human nature. I still do believe that most of us will seek the best care for others. Although we may not kill people, we can't always provide the necessary needs for others. Lawrence Becker said, " we allow people to die, when we fail to contribute money to famine-relief efforts; but even if we feel somewhat guilty, we do not consider ourselves murderers. Nor do we feel like accessories to murder when we fail to give blood, sign an organ-donor card, or do any of the other things that could save lives." We may not think of these things because when we think of killing or letting someone die, think of it literally and what we see as obvious. For example, if two siblings have the intention of killing their rich uncle, only one of them actually kills him. The other brother didn't physically cause his death, but his intention was still there. In this case, I believe that they are morally wrong.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Some may say that mercy killing is murder, and should not be done. People might say that mercy killing is not fair the victim has no say in whether they live or die. One article against euthanasia states “ the decision allows euthanasia and assisted suicides. but not also psychological suffering without limiting it to clear parameters.(Warren R.M)” Mercy killing is the most humane thing to do for a patient who is in a vegetative state. It would be unfair to make them suffer. “ choosing a pain free death demonstrates an act of love and compassion.(Preiss,…
- 628 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Instead of embracing this act of death, we should respond to suffering with compassion and solidarity. (Anderson, Screen 1) Many of the patients seeking to end their lives in this way usually suffer from depression or other mental illnesses, but also from loneliness. Instead of us giving them pills to kill them, the doctors should provide the suitable medical care they need. As for the patients in physical pain, pain management drugs can be administered to improve their quality of life. The terminally ill patients are provided with hospice care and fellowship to accompany them on their last days of life. Doctors should help their patients die a dignified death of natural causes, not assist in killing them. (Anderson, Screen 1) Physicians take the oath to always heal and care, never to kill intentionally. Palliative care focuses on the patient’s quality of life and improving it by alleviating pain and other distressing symptoms of a serious illness. At any age or stage in illness, palliative care is available to help improve the patient’s life as a whole. It does not matter if the illness is curable, chronic, or even life-threatening, medicine can improve your symptoms dramatically, helping you live with your…
- 1073 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
In the article “Euthanasia’s Slippery Slope” the author says “Distelmans also put to death identical 45-year-old deaf twins who said that they lost the will to live upon learning they would eventually go blind”(Lane). They still could've had a long life to live, and just because they were deaf, and they were told that they were gonna be blind, doesn't mean that their life is completely over. Helen Keller was deaf and blind, and she still learned how to live her life. In the article “Euthanasia’s Slippery Slope” the author talks about a clinic that was opened to get people the injections that they their regular physicians wouldn't give them, Lane says, “In the next twelve months the clinic approved euthanasia for six psychiatric patients, plus 11 people whose only recorded complaint was being, “tired of living” according to a report in the Aug 10th issue of JAMA Internal Medicine”(lane). There are many other options other than mercy killing just because you're “tired of living” or tired of taking care of something, or someone. You can find lots of help many different ways. Mercy killing isn't write and it shouldn't be done with people.…
- 603 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Even though living in pain can be a physical and emotional toll on a person’s life, no one can judge or comment on it without knowing how it feels, but choosing to end your life for this cause is ethically wrong. A person should not be able to choose between life and death like it is something normal that we do every day. Dying is not the answer to a person’s problems, pains, or sufferings. Now a day technology and medicine are highly advanced and can cure or reduce the pain of a person with a disease. Choosing to end your life is basically committing suicide and suicide is wrong.…
- 786 Words
- 4 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Euthanasia saves people from pain and suffering while dying. Richard Nicholas in his article “a quick and painless death” (euthanasia), reveal different real stories of patients who were given dozens of painkillers and muscle relaxants that eventually cause death of a person. Nicholas in his article clearly state that desire of death for a patient who is suffering from an incurable disease for a long time, is normal. Before the act of euthanasia, doctors apply resuscitative effort even when they know that patient is…
- 85 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Living is more valuable than dying and threatening to diminish the value of life is dangerous. Euthanasia, also called mercy killing, is the practice of doctors intentionally ending a terminally ill patient’s life in what is purportedly a gentle and dignified manner. The term originated in ancient Greek and means “easy death.” Doctors perform euthanasia by administering lethal drugs or by withholding treatment that would prolong the patient’s life. Physician-assisted suicide is also a form of euthanasia, but the difference between the two methods is that in euthanasia, doctors end the patient’s life with lethal injections, whereas, in physician-assisted suicide, patients kill themselves with a lethal amount of drugs prescribed by the doctors.…
- 1537 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
Physician assisted dying is a very controversial issue and it is only becoming more controversial with more cases coming to light. Many people believe that assisting a patient in dying goes against the moral code that doctors should follow. Their job is to go to any measures to sustain the life under their care, but what about individuals suffering with no hope of getting better? Wouldn’t doctors then be obligated morally to relieve these individuals of their agony and put them to peace? Considering that, some argue in favor of the sick and believe they deserve a voice and a right to choose how much suffering is enough suffering. Should someone who is suffering from a terminal illness that…
- 1035 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The difference between killing and allowing to die is that, killing is physical being the cause of someone’s death. Allowing to die is difference because they are already dying of an illness, the physicians are just treating the patient to prevent death. As soon as the physician stops treating the patient the illness will then take over, causing the patient to pass away. Consequence, there are three; “the inevitability or some abuse of the law, the difficulty of precisely writing, and the slipperiness legalizing euthanasia for moral reasons.”(18) Euthanasia and Medical Practice, Callahan talks about how medicine should not be saving us for our weak moments in life, because we cannot stand to be in pain. Callahan says “the problem is precisely that, too often in human history, killing has seemed the quick, efficient way to put aside that which burdens us. It rarely helps, and too often simply adds to one evil still another. That is what I believe euthanasia would…
- 333 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
“Any action or social policy is morally right if it serves to increase the amount of happiness in the word or to decrease the amount of misery. Conversely, an action or social policy is morally wrong if it serves to decrease happiness or to increase misery.” (RSL/Rachels, EL 247) The utilitarian argument is used to justify and condemn many policies, however, I believe that the argument is especially fitting when it comes to the matter of active euthanasia. Mercy, an action that serves to decrease the overall misery in the world, is an unquestionable sign of kindness and correctness. Mercy comes in many forms and is rarely frowned upon. Following this reasoning, why is mercy that takes the form of ending a suffering patient’s life considered…
- 1542 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
First, people have the right to end their life when they choose because they do not want to suffer anymore. There are people in this world who live with a terminal illness knowing their days are numbered. Pain has been associated with death for a long time. No one, especially the people who are dying of an illness, want to die in pain. Patients tell doctors they would rather die at home than at…
- 632 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Michael Manning, MD stated, “The term euthanasia … originally meant only good death, but in modern society it has come to mean a death free of any anxiety or pain often brought about through the use of medication. Most recently, it has come to be known as mercy killing – deliberately putting an end to someone’s life in order to spare the individuals suffering,” in his 1998 book Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide: Killing or Caring?…
- 1833 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
Medical professionals already have many burdens throughout their medical path, adding the guilt of killing someone to the list is not fair for the healthcare professionals and the family members. Euthanasia is ethically and morally wrong because the doctors have to continue to find possible ways to treat the patient not to give the patient the option of choosing to die. The incident in “Britain with the nurses technically killing the patient could have been avoided” (Fenigsen, “Other People’s Lives: Reflections On Medicine, Ethics, And Euthanasia”). Although, some people might believe that ending the patient’s pain is ending their suffering, but many fail to realize the actual outcome if euthanasia were to be practiced. For instance, “If terminating life is a benefit, the reasoning goes, why should euthanasia be limited only to those who can give consent? Why need we ask for consent” (ProCon.org, “Top Ten Pros and Cons)”, the slippery slope a reality to…
- 920 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
There is a lot of argument about whether it is ever right to kill anyone. What is killing? Well the dictionary definition is: to cause death/the act of causing death. But is that enough? Is there another type of killing? A type that is justifiable. For example if a person steals or puts you in mortal danger is it acceptable to take their life in return? But more importantly is it morally right?…
- 697 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In the face of death, science and rationale, is it unethical to safely assist those who are suffering and have the desire to die with dignity and purpose? Physician-Assisted Suicide has and will continue to be a very controversial topic of discussion when talking about the health and dignity of the terminally ill. Although none of us ever want to think of our loved ones becoming ill, rates of devastating diseases such as cancer are rapidly increasing around us. This makes the probability of one of our loved ones being affected much higher. With only five states in the US allowing legal Physician-Assisted Suicide, leaving the majority of patients unequipped with all of the options for end-of-life care plans. Despite strong push-back from some concerned about…
- 1552 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
Many people think that a doctor's role is to prevent suffering, and by allowing doctor-assisted death, it would just break the trust with the patient and the doctor. But in practice offering someone relief from an illness of which no medicine can cure is all about compassion. Forcing people to endure unwanted, intolerable suffering is inhumane and wrong. As a compassionate society, we must offer information and choices to those who face the prospect of a horrific…
- 785 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays