During the time in which Kent was exiled, he was excluded from the honor of being a nobleman. He was less respected than before, and estranged from the title and life he once held. However, through this opportunity, Kent was able to ‘vent’ out some feelings he held over another man. His disguise allowed him to hold more power than he had before as Kent erupted with a slew of enragement he held against the character Oswald. He skewered the shocked Oswald with a slanderous tongue, and was empowered by the exile that allotted his disguise and release of anger. This particular scene emphasizes how those who seem to hold the least influence actually hold further supremacy. This relates to other characters as well, such as the Fool.
Among the occasion that Kent went undercover; the king was unable to recognize him. Some might think this tragic because Kent seemed awfully fond of Lear. However, this experience was essentially supplemental to the relationship between Kent and the King. Lear appeared to trust the disguised Kent more than the one he could recognize from his past, and the connection between the both held a stronger bond than before. His exile once again has enriched the ‘unfortunate’ Kent, relating in the theme that literal blindness holds more sight than when we are able viewing the world through our natural vision.
Not only did the banishment of Kent lead him to a connection with the King, but it led him to come closer to another banished victim: Cordelia. Both suffered from the ungrateful wrath of Lear, and that key unlocked a new world for both the exiled peoples. Although Kent was in disguise within Cordelia’s camp, she was still able to recognize her father’s companion and ally. The relation between the two became undeniable by that point, and it stressed the theme that innocently expelled victims of Shakespeare’s work were the ones who could see the factual truth.
Although the expulsion of Kent from the kingdom was encrusted with the air of being unfortunate, it turned around and became one of the more enhancing opportunities of his life. It opened up new doors and allowed him to release emotion, bond with his King, and connect with the darling Cordelia. His experience strengthened him and the themes and elements of Shakespeare’s enchanting King Lear.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
3. How does Kent’s reaction to Lear’s banishment of Cordelia introduce the theme of sight and insight?…
- 349 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Lear was naked, in a sense, by the removal of all that he owned and all that he held dear, in the way that he began processing the identity of himself as a beautiful, inadequate human. Perhaps, Lear’s wild speeches that seemed mad to Caius was the voice of a good change in the man, Lear (Lamb & Lamb, 2010, p. 163).…
- 561 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
He expands the role of Kent, giving him others’ lines and he ends the film with a strong visual image of the faithful servant overseeing his master’s death. His kindness and devotion to Lear – shown graphically in his intervention in Lear’s fit – ensures that the audience is able to care about and sympathise with Lear. Blessed also gives substantial screen time to the conflict between Kent and Oswald, the sole point of which is to contrast the behaviour of a man who has honour and integrity with that of a man who has…
- 835 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Hope comes in many forms in King Lear, and at first arrives in the character of Kent. Like the audience, Kent is able to see the mistaken ways of Lear, and is the first to step in and address Cordelia’s suffering. “See better, Lear...Thy youngest daughter does not love thee least.” (1:1:146-153) In one dramatic interpretation of the play, Kent is positioned between Lear and Cordelia, symbolizing perhaps, a link between the mistaken mind of an old King, and the “more ponderous” (1:1:73) love of a young heir, furthermore acting as“the true blank of thine eye” (1:1:153) for his decrepit King. Kent brings the hope for justice to a…
- 999 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Shakespeare 's tragedy King Lear can be interpreted in many ways and many responses. The imprecision’s and complication of the play has led to its many production. Interpreting the issues and ideas in King Lear is dependant upon each individual responder. Individuals may be influenced by their own personal experiences, moral and ethical standards and the situation of their time.…
- 1751 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
According to facts , William J. Clinton 'Appendix A ' made the strongest argument to promote racial equality. Racial equality means for black people to be looked as equal to white people. Many great speeches have been made such as Martin Luther King Jr's " I Have A Dream " and Barak Obama's " Remarks..." , both addressing the same issues as Clinton's. In my opinion , Clinton's was the strongest.…
- 503 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Lear’s hamartia is primarily exposed through his unappeasable need for self-appraisal. His narcissistic conduct is brought on by his need for flattery and is the reason for his vulnerability to extreme reaction. As Lear seeks self-appraisal in the first act, he is gravely disappointed in his youngest daughter’s response: “… I cannot heave / My heart into my mouth. I love your majesty / According to my bond, no more nor less.” (I.i.90-92) Her sheer honesty and refusal to give in to his test expose the King’s tragic flaw, as he acts rashly in banishing Cordelia along with his loyal friend Kent. Not only is Lear insulted by her refusal of appraisal, but his vanity inhibits him from being reasonable as he cannot accept that his daughter does not love him more than a daughter ought love her father. Lear tragically misinterprets reality and his injured pride leads him to anger, causing him to act without contemplation. The King’s unbridled fury leads to his unbearable suffering as it unfolds through further action. Through the effect of his hamartia, the King acts without reason and consequently loses his most beloved daughter.…
- 1159 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
In the play King Lear by William Shakespeare, King Lear is an old foolish man who suffers several flaws in the same way, he is blind to the truth, and his inability to see the truth impacts his decisions making and his poor judgment. Throughout act one and two, King Lear decisions lead to several consequences, which alter his life and the lives of those around him. A few of King Lear’s flaws which demonstrates the great deed of one man’s consequences are, his actions due to his blindness, rash decision making and exhibits a great deed of pride and arrogance.…
- 1477 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Lear makes a second mistake when he casts out the two people who truly care for him: Cordelia and Kent. Cordelia’s honesty enrages the king. He completely disowns her, stating that he loved her the most but she does not love him at all. When Kent tries to intervene and show him that Cordelia truly does love him, Lear ignores his words and tells him to be silent. Kent, knowing how wrong Lear is, still attempts to inform the king of…
- 980 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
Shakespeare demonstrates the abuse and corruption of a society’s hierarchical structure can have a demeaning effect on an individual’s affinity to …? and identity. This notion is expressed in the play through vignettes of estranged relationships. Shakespeare establishes the exclusion of Orlando and his discontentment with Oliver’s negligence of his moral responsibility, evident in the angry and indignant tone of “he keeps me rustically at home”. The use of broken prose here encapsulates Orlando’s perspective of being denied his rightful place within the family through Oliver’s tyrannical treatment of him. The conflict is then escalated into a heated dispute, where Shakespeare uses stichomythia to highlight the sinister reversal of the most natural human relationships, “I will physic your rankness, and yet give no thousand crowns neither.” Oliver dehumanises Orlando here, depriving him of his education and identity in the society resulting in his inability to form attachments towards the court. Thus, Shakespeare overturns the assumption of the family unit being a source of…
- 1130 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
The notion that humanity is possessed only by those who understand and perceive the basic human condition can be seen to be explored in King Lear. Lear’s advancing madness allows him to perceive reality once he is stripped of his title and reduced to “nothing” during the storm scene; that is, that man is merely a “poor, bare, forked animal” and that he, for all his royalty, is “no more than this”. Imagery is utilised to affirm his epiphany and accept his insignificance as a mere mortal. In his humility, Lear is able to understand the values of humanity, demonstrated when he bids Cordelia not to resist being jailed, an indication that he has discovered that true filial love is more important than fighting for the material concepts of rank, property and power.…
- 1057 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Mercy truly is the fundamental characteristic to civilized human life. Mercy in other words is compassion shown by one person to another or a request from one person to another to be shown, such as unwarranted compassion for a crime or wrongdoing. Without mercy, people who make mistakes would suffer or worse, die. If I had the choice to pick between Mercy and Justice it would be mercy. Mercy is the leniency, compassion, kindness and forgiveness given to a person by a higher authority. Mercy is more of a basic essential to civilized human life. I will show how mercy, not justice, is the highest value we have as a society. Mercy brings about proper resolution for everyone to benefit, whereas justice is just a solo person or majority that would benefit without having to sacrifice anyone’s’ life.…
- 620 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Cited: Shakespeare, William, and Russell A. Fraser. The Tragedy of King Lear. New York: New American Library, 1986. Print.…
- 1443 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
The play King Lear by the famous William Shakespeare, embodies a great many themes which were quite ahead of their time. Some of these include justice, gender roles, and questioning societal standards. None of these are more important, however, than the theme of self. The question of findings oneself has been eternally embedded into human nature. Whether looking for ourselves in religion, hobbies, or our work, the concept of “being yourself” has been one taught throughout the ages of mankind. Shakspeare touches on this topic in the forms of a few characters in King Lear. The most important of these characters are Edgar, Kent, and of course the king himself, King Lear. King Lear struggles with the loss of his identity due to the giving away of his kingdom in a chaotic and forced way., Characters such as Kent and Edgar struggle with identity as well, but in a more controlled state, as they choose to change their appearance and take on alternate identities. The alternate identities of Kent and Edgar allows them to accomplish things they otherwise would not have been able to as themselves, and speak in ways prohibited otherwise, showing that when used properly, the controlled change in oneself can be used for good.…
- 1228 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Lear makes several poor choices, most importantly in misjudging the sincerity of his daughters' words; but when he flees out into the open heath during a storm, his madness seems a painful and excessive punishment to witness. Parallel to Lear's punishment is that which Gloucester suffers. The plucking of Gloucester's eyes can be perceived as another instance in which divine justice is lacking. Gloucester has made several errors in judgment, as has Lear; but the brutal nature of Gloucester's blinding--the plucking out of his eyes and the crushing of them under Cornwall's boots--is surely in excess of any errors he might have made.…
- 691 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays