Akira Kurosawa’s film “Ran” tells a story of Lord Hidetora divides his kingdom among his three sons Taro, the eldest son, will rule this kingdom. Jiro, Lord Hidetora’s second son is expected to help Taro. Saburo, the youngest son, will get the third castle but the only rule is for him to obey his elder brother. Saburo refuses and is banished. This movie can be seen as a transformation of William Shakespeare’s play “King Lear”, and it greatly resembles “King Lear”. Both tell a story of betrayal which a king distributed his wealth to his offspring. Two of the offspring turned against their father, while the third supports the father even though the father did no good thing to him. Since “Ran” is a movie derived from William Shakespeare’s play “King Lear”, they are connected to each other but not exactly the same. …show more content…
For example, visually, they both reveal the feeling of betrayal. The king in both plays distributes his kingdom based on the flattery his sons give. It is because of the unnatural way of distributing his kingdom that leads to the ultimate tragedy. When we read the play and watch the movie, it is not hard to find that the character in “King Lear”—the Fool also exists in the movie. This shows the importance of this character. Just as in the play, the Fool’s words compare to Lear’s adds the element of irony to both the stories. A truth that even the Fool knows, the king seems to know nothing about it, which makes the audience wonder why Lear and Hidetora are qualified to be the king. In a way, we can see this movie as a mirror of the play King Lear. This movie visually shows the madness of the king and the way his two children treated him, which allows the audience to better understand the original play. Although, the screenplay of “Ran” has similarities with “King Lear”, Kurosawa did not want the movie to be exactly a duplication of the original