Preview

King Leopold s Ghost Response Paper

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1433 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
King Leopold s Ghost Response Paper
Abel Habte
HIS 323.001
Prof. Chakravartty
4/16/15
King Leopold’s Ghost Response Paper With an estimated death toll of ten million people, King Leopold’s conquest of the Congo is recognized as one of the bloodiest holocausts in human history. The sheer brutality of this gruesome process triggered the world’s first international human rights movement. However, unlike the holocaust of Jews committed by the Nazi regime in mid-twentieth century Germany, the Belgian extermination of the Congolese has gone largely forgotten. In King Leopold’s Ghost, Adam Hochschild seeks to revive the fervor and vehemence with which the world remembers this tragedy. Prior to reading this book, my own understanding of the genocide in the Congo was that of just another awful tragedy in the long process of colonial imperialism. However, after reading the extremely detailed King Leopold’s Ghost, I was able to take note of Leopold’s careful deliberation in his methodical approach to expanding his empire revealing the little regard he had for Congo natives who he saw simply as impediments in his plans. In his well-researched work King Leopold’s Ghost, Hochschild was able to reconstruct the Belgian takeover of the Congo from an almost omniscient point of view. Through his narration, the reader is able to see all of the involved agents of the story (King Leopold, Henry Morton Stanley, William Sheppard) acting in motion and how the actions of one affected the plans and behaviors of others. Hochschild’s reconstruction reveals King Leopold’s meticulous manipulation of key individuals and entire governments throughout his expansionist scheme and the lengths a power hungry ruler would go to in order to get his share of the African cake. Although emphasizing the exceptional brutality displayed by Belgian forces in the Congo, Hochschild is also able to present this particular display of imperialism as representative of the colonial ventures of several other European nations such as Germany’s takeover

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Adam Hochschild's "King Leopold's Ghost" is a lost historical account starting in the late 19th century continuing into the 20th century of the enslavement of an entire country. The book tells the story of King Leopold and his selfish attempt to essentially make Belgium bigger starting with the Congo. This was all done under an elaborate "philanthropic" public relations curtain deceiving many countries along with the United States (the first to sign on in Leopold's claim of the Congo). There were many characters in the book ones that aided in the enslavement of the Congo and others that help bring light to the situation but the most important ones I thought were: King Leopold, a cold calculating, selfish leader, as a child he was crazy about geography and as an adult wasn't satisfied with his small kingdom of Belgium setting his sites on the Congo to expand. Hochschild compares Leopold to a director in a play he even says how brilliant he is in orchestrating the capture of the Congo. Another important character is King Leopold's, as Hochschild puts it, "Stagehand" Henry Morton Stanley. He was a surprisingly cruel person killing many natives of the Congo in his sophomore voyage through the interior of Africa (The first was to find Livingston). Leopold used Stanley to discuss treaties with African leaders granting Leopold control over the Congo. Some of the natives he talked to weren't even in the position to sign the treaties or they didn't know what they were signing. And probably the most influential person in the book, E.D. Morel. Morel, an employee of a Belgian company that handled shipments to the Congo, noticed that the shipments coming to and from the Congo seemed really suspicious.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Edited by Kevin Reilly. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s Press. 2012. The King of the West African state of Congo, Nzinga Mbemba, writes his “Appeal to the King of Portugal” in hopes of the removal of unnecessary white men, and requests only religious aid and figures from…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “A little more than a quarter of a century ago, a great genius for evil, having achieved in rapid succession a series of diplomatic master strokes, stretched out to reach the scepter which was to give him power over life and death of over 20 million human beings.” This great genius for evil, King Leopold II, was commonly known for the atrocities he committed in the Congo Free State. Leopold’s ability to gain control over the lives of the Congolese was due to the deceit and use of persuasion over head powers for a lucrative business. Specifically, in the Congo Free State, King Leopold II’s approach to governing, in an effort to gain the most profit, lead to violent atrocities and the deaths of many natives.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Government scandal is no shocking news, constant new conspiracies and power plays are all too frequently covered by the media for such a thing to be a surprise. The biggest scandal is covering up their own actions. Too much history is covered up by governments around the world. Selfishly, they hide their own shameful history to keep a good name and to stay in good graces with their subjects. In his final chapter of King Leopold’s Ghost, Adam Hochschild conveys how the transgression of the Flemish to the Congolese was erased. How is it that the people of both the Congo and Belgium have completely forgotten the horrors their predecessors endured and committed? For every secret that is uncovered, how many more are…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Once in the early 1880’s, King Leopold of Belgium was the first to colonize, or own, a private country in central Africa known as the Congo Free State, kicking off European imperialism. However, the way he managed and took over that region was controversial among European leaders such as Otto von Bismarck, who as a result of King Leopold’s actions, proposed for a conference to be held regarding the standards for claiming land. This conference was known as the Berlin Conference of 1884. From this event, multiple standards and regulations were created, one of those including the rule of occupation which stated that a nation or country had to have treaty agreements, buildings, soldiers, and administrators on the ground to support its’ claim. Additive…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Leopold II of Belgium was a manipulative ruler who created injustices in the Congo Free State. Many missionaries and young idealists traveled to Africa for adventure but unexpectedly found themselves amidst a holocaust. Despite the many African rebel leaders’ attempts to stop King Leopold, over ten million Congolese people were killed.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The intention of colonialism, though cloaked with moral justification, was clear from the beginning: in order to assert oneself as a dominant power, a country must steal, ravish and exploit the land, people and culture belonging to another. The belief that taking of foreign land was justified because a particular country had the power to do so with little genuine resistance was so prevalent during the late Nineteenth, early Twentieth centuries that it significantly, and tragically affected those colonized land. In Adam Hochschild’s novel, King Leopold’s Ghost, he details chronicles that events that shaped King Leopold of Belgium’s rule over the Congo in Africa, but also illustrates that what went on was not aberrant. Rather, it was example of a broader problem that plagued many Europeans countries in the decades leading up to World War One that led to the death of millions.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout his reign as the King of the Belgians, Leopold II both followed and went against some of the ideas Niccolo Machiavelli lists in “The Prince”. One of the first things Leopold II did when he came into power in 1865 was pulling Belgium into neutrality in Europe due to recent shifts in the European balance of power. This goes against what Niccolo Machiavelli says in “The Prince” about what a prince must do to be esteemed. “A prince can also win prestige by declaring himself an ally of one side of a conflict. Neutrality alienates both the victor and the loser” (Machiavelli). He tells us in this quote that a prince should choose a side when making allies instead of staying neutral. He claims that the victor will see the nation as a “doubtful friend” while the loser will see them as a coward. Since Belgium was seen as a powerless country in Europe at the time, it probably would have been wise of him to choose a side with either France or Germany since they bordered Belgium and could have taken over at any time. In an instance where Leopold II did follow Machiavelli’s ideas, he lied in the Brussel’s Conference in 1876 by saying that by expanding into the Congo Free State, he was only “promoting scientific exploration of Africa for the advancement of knowledge and for the economic benefit of all humanity” (Blumberg, 161). Machiavelli states that “a prince who honors his word is generally praised by others”, but at the same time, he should be a master of deception by learning “how to fight both with laws and with force” (Machiavelli). Therefore, the best of all princes is one that keeps his promises, but knows when it’s the right time to lie. In this case, Leopold lied at the conference so that he could receive the Congo for his own benefit. Since Belgium was a Constitutional Monarchy in which the king had very little power over domestic affairs, he really didn't do much that would have affected the lives of his people directly. Therefore, by getting the Congo to…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Double Standards

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Another example of King Leopold’s hypocrisy is his accepting the recognition for being a humanitarian. It is hard to imagine someone accepting labels like, “humanitarian” (92) or his efforts being called “the greatest humanitarian work of this time,” (46) when people are being tortured, raped, mutilated and murdered under his rule Forcing the local Congolese into slave labor when he himself denounced the Arab slave trade is by no means humanitarian. Or, putting the Congolese in chains and justifying it as teaching them, “the sanctity of work” (118) humanitarian…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He called his own slaves volunteers, but they were in chains. Leopold’s army would hold women, children and chiefs as hostages until the men met the quota of the amount of rubber. This clearly shows that King Leopold was lying to everyone that he wanted to ban slave trade and he would have the media cover up the…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Supporting Evidence #1: “However, he licensed companies that brutally exploited Africans by forcing them to collect sap from rubber plants. At least 10 million Congolese died due to the abuses inflicted during Leopold's rule.”World history: Patterns of interactions. (2009). p#774…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Congo Free State, later named the Democratic Republic of Congo, drastically changed in 1876 when it was first colonized by King Leopold of Belgium. The colony of the Congo Free State was ruled solely by King Leopold, who used it for his own personal advancement. He took advantage of the country's well-known sources such as rubber. King Leopold of Belgium took all profits made off of the resources for himself and left the native people with nothing. In addition, King Leopold enslaved these natives and treated them poorly. They were forced to do hard and dangerous labor and if they did not meet the King’s standards, they could be killed. While the inhabitants of the Congo Free State could not do much to retaliate against the King, other countries…

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Belgium saw them as an easy target with big profits and imperialized. Belgium, as a western nation, also agreed to the ideas of Social Darwinism, the belief that the white European was better than the rest of the people in the world, chiefly based on their physical features. Simply put, they were racist. Most Europeans fell into this belief, but the Belgian people took this to an extreme. They enslaved the native people of Congo in their own country and forced work upon them. Quotas and taxes were created to ensure certain amounts of raw materials were gathered and harsh punishments were put into action for those who didn’t complete or meet their requirements. According to Mark Twain, “The amount of rubber needed to meet the tax requires the men to work for up 25 days each month harvesting the wild rubber vines in the Congo forest” [3]. According to this that would leave only 5 days a month for “regular” life for the Congolese people. They did not have the time or resources to educate themselves, make money, or to develop. In 1908 the Belgian government gave the natives better treatment, by taking away the direct ownership of the nation from Leopold and they made it an official colony of the Belgian government [4]. This decision came through by putting humanitarian pressure put on King Leopold. Conditions improved, schools, hospitals, and roads were built, but the cruelty and racism was still their because of the history they had of it. Also, the punishment, crimes, and cruelty was all that the people understood because they were forced to live in it their entire lives, and it was a hard to shift back. Even in today’s world, this industrialization and these policies have left a scar on the Congos. In both the Republic of Congo and the Democratic Republic Of Congo there is still political unrest and constant violence. On December 17, there were 22…

    • 1768 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperialism is the ideology that drives the Europeans in the “Heart of Darkness” towards the Congo for its ivory. In the Congo, the only things worth paying attention towards are those that provide monetary benefits, and this can be seen when Conrad states “Some, I heard, got drowned in the surf; but whether they did or not, nobody seemed particularly to care.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When a famous missionary and explorer by the name of Dr. David Livingstone vanished in the Congo Basin, he led a mission to find him. After Stanley's successful exploration of central Africa, king of the Belgians, Leopold II, wanted Stanley to carry out expeditions for him. Leopold was looking to establish a domain in Africa, and that is just what he did. Before long, the African territory held by Belgium had become infamous for the ghastly treatment of the native population. In King Leopold's Public Letter, the king writes to missionaries working for him in the Congo.…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays