Preview

King Richard Iii and Looking for Richard

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2201 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
King Richard Iii and Looking for Richard
The texts King Richard III and Looking for Richard both accept the centrality of power and the yearning for it, as a central plot driver and an assumed part of the human condition. However, each presents a different perspective as to the nature of power; its origins and morality.

Discuss this statement with close, detailed reference to both texts set for study.

Power is defined as the possession of control or command over people and events. In Shakespeare’s play ‘King Richard III’, the centrality of power is communicated through characters and their pursuit for power while in ‘Looking for Richard’, Al Pacino’s docudrama exploring Richard as a character, his struggle for power is portrayed as well as Pacino’s struggle as he produces the film. Both texts accept the centrality of power by using it as a significant plot driver and assumed part of the human condition. The two texts, however, present different concepts about the nature of power through the techniques used for different audiences, influenced by the contexts in which the texts are composed.

In Shakespeare's play, it is easily seen that power is central as the whole situation that the characters find themselves in is due to a struggle for power, a fight for the throne. The civil war between the houses of York and Lancasters has been won ‘by this son of York’, King Edward, Richard’s brother. In the opening soliloquy Richard says ‘…since I cannot prove a lover/ To entertain these fair well-spoken days, / I am determined to prove a villain’. It is not only Richard who thirsts for power, but also Buckingham and the Woodvilles. Buckingham chooses to politically align himself with Richard for his gain, apparent when he asks Richard for the promised earldom of Hereford. He ignores Margaret’s warnings about Richard and continues to support him. He also enjoys acting almost as much as Richard, seen in Act 3 scene 5 when he tells Richard he can ‘counterfeit the deep tragedian’, and ‘I will play the orator’

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Richard tried to end the war of the roses and placate the Lancastrians by honouring Henry VI through a ceremonious reburial, and by trying to build bridges with the Woodvilles by persuading Elizabeth out of protective sanctuary and to attend court whilst paying her an annuity (Elizabeth was born into a Lancastrian family and did marry a minor Lancastrian noble before marrying the Yorkist king). He tried to end the war of the roses because they were unpopular with the kingdom and the nobles. This is a clear demonstration of how he could have been a great king. This is because he is trying to win over defected supporters and gain trust, popularity and an affinity with as many people as possible. It also shows how he tried to gain affinity with the nobility by gaining trust and showing respect to the Lancastrian history.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    King Richard’s ability as an actor within a play explores how this type of villainy was entertaining in the era of Shakespeare. Richard’s evil is immediately established as his moral deformities are clearly embodied in his physical deformities. In justifying his premeditated meddling, he personifies war in his first soliloquy. ‘Grim visag’d war hath supported his wrinkled front’ and moved to caper ‘ nimbly in a lady’s chamber!’ Richard’s nature: ‘Deform’d, unfinished’ thus justifies his evil as he cannot participate in the war -lovemaking atmosphere. This was obviously a form of entertainment to the Shakespearean audience who had known of the war of the Roses and Richard’s deformities.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare’s “Richard III” exists as a providential narrative in support of the Tudor Myth; that it was only through the divinely sanctioned rule of Henry VII that brought about peace after an era of turmoil under the reign of Richard III. As such, Shakespeare’s pro-Tudor bias highlights the politically and morally absolutist agenda of his time.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By analysing the parallels and differences between King Richard III and Looking For Richard, the responder is positioned to appreciate the distinctive contexts from which each text emerged. Whilst an exploration of the moral vices and corruptive consequences of the relentless pursuit of power is explored in both texts, a closer examination of the way power is represented…

    • 1076 Words
    • 35 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    William Shakespeare’s, King Richard III, and Al Pacino’s film, Looking for Richard, conversely explores key ideas and values portrayed in both texts. The comparison accentuates the deep similarity of ideas and values, which drive the two texts. Villainy and power in King Richard III highlights the values of moderation and stability of the Renaissance age. Similarly, Al Pacino examines these same ideas to emphasise the values of creativity and artistic integrity. Examining how each composer relies on an exaggerated and heightened characterisation of Richard…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the War of the Roses, England was constantly in a state of war between the House of Lancaster and the House of York, who were massive rivals that competed for the throne of England (History 320 Lecture, 10/30/2015). In Polydore Vergil’s account of Henry VII, Richard III’s personal ambition can be seen. The author first tells of a nightmare Richard has the night before Bosworth Field, which Vergil believes was “no dream but a conscience guilty of heinous offences, a conscience, I say” (Polydore Vergil, Account of Henry VII, 479). Though the source makes no explicit mentions of it, it is widely believed that Richard III murdered his nephews to take the throne. When his brother, Edward IV died, his legitimate son was crowned Edward V, but was shortly taken captive by his uncle and placed into the Tower of London (History 320 Lecture, 10/30/2015). Instead of allowing for a legitimate heir to take the throne as it should have gone, Richard went to immeasurable lengths to ensure he would be king, further escalating the conflict and disrupting English society as a whole. This caused not only great scandal, but Richard III was a terrible king, guilty of many offenses as Vergil states. He created great disruption not only in his court by taking the throne away from his nephew, but also to the lives of his subjects. Vergil makes note of this as well, specifically mentioning the strife of the English people, who had consistently been “torn by rival factions” (Polydore Vergil, Account of Henry VII,…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    William Shakespeare’s “King Richard III”, an Elizabethan play written as a piece of Tudor propaganda, and Al Pacino’s 1996 docudrama “Looking For Richard” set in contemporary New York, have distinctive parallels in what values they concern themselves with despite their markedly different contexts. Our understanding of both texts is advanced through exploring the composers’ contrasting values of free will clashing with Providentialism and the importance of integrity and honesty in the Murder of Clarence scene from “Looking for Richard” as well as its corresponding scene from “King Richard III” (Act 1 Scene IV) and the Coronation scene (Act 3 Scene 7) and from an examination of how these flow from the changes in context.…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our values and morals remain timeless as they form the basis of our interaction with each other and are instilled as part of our humanity defining us as beings. The Shakespearean play, “King Richard III” and its hybrid doco-drama appropriation, “looking for Richard’ directed by Al Pacino, reveal inherent values of power in relation to our morality and justice. As Shakespeare focuses on the human psyche and the role of god’s Devine retribution in the Elizabethan era, Pacino on the other hand emphasizes the American context to allow audiences to re-evaluate the significance of the political and social values present in KRIII, thus enriching our understanding of the original text.…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The characters, namely Richard III and Richmond, offer an insight into the contextual concerns of the Elizabethan period. Their values offer modern audiences the opportunity to identify contextual features because the values are a product of the context, as is the text itself. Richard III is the epitome of the villain. He values deceit, devilishness, power and a disconnection from God and family which is against everything the pious Elizabethans believed in and this is depicted through his actions and language “I am determined to prove a villain” (I.i.30). The emphasis on good vs. evil and wrong vs. right was of the utmost significance to audiences because it taught them moral lessons. These moral lessons were important to Elizabethans because religion was an overarching aspect of their cultural context. Shakespeare combined the idea of Richard being deformed together with these values to emphasise the insidious nature of his personality and in effect, contrast him against the heroic Richmond.…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jane Eyre

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Our interest in the parallels between King Richard III and Looking For Richard is further enhanced by consideration of the marked differences in textual form. Evaluate this statement in the light of your Comparative Study of King Richard III and Looking For Richard.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A values that is used in both King Richard III and Looking for Richard is the value of integrity. In order to claim power to the throne, Richard uses much deceit and the misuse of power throughout the play, which highlights Richard’s lack of integrity. It is through such devious and detailed schemes that the audience is able understand the importance of the value of integrity throughout one’s life. One of the clear misuses of power can be seen in the scene of the innocent murder of the princes where Tyrrel expresses “The tyrannous and blood act is done, the most arch deed of piteous massacre that ever yet this land was guilty of…within their alabaster innocent arms. Their lips were four red roses on a stalk…A book of prayers on their pillow lay.” Through this quote, Tyrell describes the murder as the most ruthless in the country and pledges the innocence of the princes through their pure, white skin, red lips and uses religious imagery to describe their angelic innocence. The juxtaposition of the evil deed of their murder and the description of the innocence of the princes highlights the evil that has come out of…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard Iii

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Shakespeare also gives great insight on Richard’s mind via diction. In Richard’s opening lines he specifically says, “Our dreadful marches to delightful measures” (1,1,8). Instead of fighting the Lancasters Richard (and his family) are in a time of harmony. He intentionally changes the negative word to a positive. Lines like these are all throughout the opening soliloquy. Richard allows the audience to see that he is at peace, that he is relaxed. By his big soliloquy in Act 5, Richard’s attitude is down. He’s worried about all the deeds he’s done. He directly states, “Is there a murderer here? No. Yes, I am:” (5,3,211). Not only does he leave the negative word of “murderer” in the sentence, but he…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Richard iii

    • 1757 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Though still sick, King Edward IV brokers a reconciliation between Queen Elizabeth, Dorset, and Rivers and Hastings and Buckingham. Anon, Richard appears to reconcile with everyone else when Queen Elizabeth mentions her wish to have Clarence pardoned. To the shock of everyone, most especially to King Edward IV himself who claims that he had issued an order reversing Clarence’s condemnation, Richard informs the gathered assembly that Clarence is dead and buried, adding that the King’s countermand must have been too late to reverse the original edict and insinuating that the Queen is responsible; at this point, Stanley comes to beg the King to have a servant of his pardoned for killing a man. The request spurs the King to chide his subjects for their collective failure to plead on behalf of Clarence, arguing that it’s a crying shame that no one thought it his duty to stand up for a King’s brother when at this very moment a noble is standing up on behalf of a slave. Distressed, the King goes back to his room. The children of Clarence, question their grandmother, the Duchess, as to why she’s often so sad of late if not for the fact of their father‘s death. The Duchess replies that she’s sad because of her son’s Edward’s illness and that their father Clarence hasn’t died. The latter of the Duchess’ assertion, however, contradicts what the Boy knows to be truth as he has been told by his uncle, Richard, that the King has had their father killed and at the behest of the Queen. The Duchess assures the boy that his uncle has lied and wonders how she could have ever given birth to such a disgrace Richard. The Queen, accompanied by Rivers and Dorset, appears in a state of dishevelment. King Edward IV has died. She appears to be inconsolable, but Dorset and Rivers manage to calm her, arguing that she cannot begrudge God his payment and that she has yet her son, the Prince of Wales, from her marriage to King Edward IV, who will no doubt be King, on whom she may rely.…

    • 1757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Milton said that man exists on a wheel of power, alluding to the intrigue with the power of the political realm that forever unites masses. The interaction of people and politics becomes comprised of the plots and mechanisms designed to increase an individuals control over their environments or their government. Shakespeare’s King Henry IV and Mary Wollstonecraft’s A vindication in the rights of women explore the various agencies in ones ascension to power whether it be through usurpation, a Machiavellian scheme or an outcry of injustice, contrasting the various representations of significant personalities from the extravagance of the Elizabethan kings to the ordinary and cunning demeanour of modern day rebels.…

    • 111 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard ii

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Shakespeare is trying to tell the audience the way Richard II rules England through imagery. In both of the scenes in this paper Shakespeare uses imagery to describe the way King Richard II has brought the country to ruin. This king needs replaced and in both speeches his bad deeds are spoken of through a metapohor of a garden. The speech in Act 2 Scene 1 is a way for Gaunt to tell Richard exactly how he feels about the way things have been going in England. In his dying breathe he describes England as a incredible garden and still shows Richard his wrongs and gives him some advice.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays