Preview

Kingfisher Airlines Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
822 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Kingfisher Airlines Case Study
INTRODUCTION
Kingfisher was one of the largest aviation companies in India. It was set up in the year 2003 by the United Breweries Group but shut down its operations in 2012 as it never made profit. In 2015, United Bank of India declared Vijay Mallya, the company’s promoter and chairman, a ‘wilful defaulter’. The company owed more than rupees 80 billion in unpaid loans to banks and tax authorities, employees had claims against the company for unpaid amounts.
ANALYSIS
Q1.Who is obliged to repay a company’s debts: the company, promoters, shareholders, or directors?
ANS: Firstly if a director is complying with the law then the company is obliged to repay its debt as it is a separate legal entity from its directors, shareholders. Director’s will
…show more content…
He was charged with conspiracy and fraud and was declared as a wilful defaulter by the bank.
Q2. Are there circumstances under which promoters or directors could be asked to repay the loans taken by the company?
ANS: A Promoter is a person who participates in acts on behalf of a company that has to complete formal incorporation. If the company fails to complete the registration process, he may be liable for the contracts but he will not be liable to repay a company’s debt until and unless he is still holding a position in the company. In case of Kingfisher, Vijay Mallaya is a promoter as well as the Managing Director of the company and he gave personal assurance to the banks so he could be asked to repay the loans taken.
A director is a person who is responsible for managing the company’s activities.
As a company is a separate legal entity it is obliged to repay its debt but in case 1. A director falsely misrepresents a company for money and is proved guilty then he is obliged to repay company’s
…show more content…
He is personally obliged to repay back.
Q3. What options do the banks have for recovery of the loans in a case like this one?
ANS To recover bank loans, banks form consortium to proceed with these loans together and sign a Master Debt Recast Agreement with the borrowing company to merge all the loans into a single term loan. Various assets and personal guarantee if any, that the company had pledged to the banks as security will be pooled together. The banks may use Sarfaesi Act under which it will give a notice to the company to clear their loans within 60 days failing to which, it will sale the securities to recover the loan.
In this case, banks also did the same, they form consortium and signed a master Debt Recast Agreement with the Kingfisher Airlines to merge all the loans into a single term loan. Some banks sold Kingfisher Airlines shares pledged against the loans, also sold Mallaya’s luxurious Kingfisher Villa in Goa for rs 73 crore and they also tried to sell the trademarks but failed as their value has gone down to nothing. They are still trying to recover the remaining debt.
Q4. What are the rights of a company’s shareholders against the promoter in a case like this

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Countrywide Financial

    • 3004 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Countrywide Financial was a mortgage-banking firm. They had one of the largest market shares in the early 2000s, when the mortgage market was booming. “No company pursued growth in home loans more aggressively than Countrywide” (NY Times 12/10). They were the leader of their industry, with 500 billion in home loans, 62,000 employees, 900 offices, and $200 billion in assets. Everything had been going well for the company and its employees, until the mortgage crisis began to unfold at the end of 2006. In June 2009, the SEC filed a civil suit against the founder of the business and some of his top management for fraud and insider trading. This came at the height of the mortgage crisis in the US. The founder of Countrywide, Angelo Mozilo, finally agreed to pay $45million in profits and $22.5 million in civil penalties, in which he still admits no wrongdoing.…

    • 3004 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    LOBOFinal Exam 2

    • 1275 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Jack, Tom and Mary are executive directors of Photolab Ltd. Jack owns 8% of the shares, Tom 15% and Mary 7%. 15% of the shares are owned by 700 shareholders and the remaining 55% shares are owned by Photoproductions Ltd. Although Tom has never been formally appointed as managing director of the company, he has assumed that role and the other directors allow him to do so. The Board was aware that Tom’s business card described him as the managing director of Photolab Ltd. Often Tom entered into contracts on behalf of the company binding the company up to $1 million dollars without seeking the prior approval of the board. The company, however, always honoured these contracts.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lawson Case

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The first bank loan of $194, 000 was planned to be used to pay off the significant trade debt with his primary supplier, Forsyth Wholesale Ltd (FWL). The second debt of 26, 000 he would then use to assist with his monthly cash shortage. From the excessive amount of $217, 236 trade debts yet to be paid to FWL, Mackay has been paying a tax penalty of 13.5 per cent on $193, 668. Furthermore, in 2003 FWL financed the expansion of Lawsons store size to raise future sales. Hence, this expansion cost a total of $36, 000 and was added to the company’s trade debt. The sole purpose was proved to be indeed helping increase sales volume based on the 2003 sales results. The main question remains at this point, after the analysis of ratios and projected statements, should Lawsons be approved for a loan grant from the bank?…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Youme

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The remedies for breach a general law duty include an injunction, compensation or damages, an account of profits, rescission of a contract, and a constructive trust. Firstly, the company can seek an injunction, which is an order of the court requiring the director to stop doing something or to undertake a particular action, in this case, EY can terminate the contract. Secondly, in this case, even though EY has not yet suffered any loss or damage, the court can still order the director to pay any profit the director made because of the breach of duty to the company. The director will have to account for the profit of commission to the company.(Regal(Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver) Thirdly, a director can breach their duty to the company if the director enters into a contract with the company and the director's interest in the contract is not disclosed. If the court finds that there has been a breach of duty, the court can order the contract to be rescinded. In this case, Roberta did not disclose her interest gained from WHS in the contract properly, there should be a rescission of the contract. However, EY makes large profits from the contract, they may not want to rescide it.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It depend upon the approach of the legal duties of the administrators which were framework in the Corporation Act. The court has noticed that the appellant provide the legal duties approaching the suer and the duties which were performed was not for the benefit of himself although it was not for the benefit of other partner too. It was only for the benefit of the company. It was noticed by the court that there has been contravention of legal duties performed by the offender discarding the prosecutor out of the building for profit and loss account and also regarding the goodwill of the company.The court held that the offender has to paid a premium for the losses which has been incurred. Although the court told them that in order for compensation they can buy shares from offender for their losses incurred.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Law Case Study

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The corporation ran into financial trouble a year after the loan was extended. The corporation was unable to make the mortgage payments as a result the mortgage went into default. The bank turned to Ebbers and demanded payment. Since Ebbers was unaware of the new contract he is not bond to the contract anymore so therefore the bank cannot demand payment from Ebbers. The bank now has to go to the new president and board of directors who signed the refinancing and demand payment from them. In my opinion I think that Ebbers does have the right not to have to pay the bank because he was unaware of the new contract and the parties that signed the new contract with the bank should have to come up with the…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The problem seen in this scenario was protections related to loans. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency aimed to correct this problem. In response to this, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency issued a $30 million civil money penalty against Bank of America.…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Finance Midterm

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Although the stockholders of the corporation are insulated by limited legal liability, the legal status of the corporation does not protect the firm’s managers in the same way, i.e., bondholders can sue its managers if the firm defaults on its debt.…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    We have to pay especial attention to the agreement reached with the former Co-owner of the company, Mr. Verden. This agreement is affecting the cash flow of the company since the interest expenses raises by around $12,000.00 more per year, this together the financial interest of the Metropolitan’s Bank loan makes that the company needs a larger amount to finance its debts, that by the way regarding the agreement with Verden should not being paid by the company but by Jones personal income since this agreement was not reached between the company and Verden but between Verden and Jones. Furthermore, we are assuming that the company is paying this agreement since the Metropolitan’s interest rate if not will be of 12,45% per year which it seems to be very high for a bank of this kind. See Table 3…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The general rule is that shareholders, board of directors, and corporate officers are not liable for the debt of corporation. An exception is allowed, however, when such is to prevent abuse of the privilege of corporate status during which courts sometime pierce the corporate veil to expose shareholders and directors/officers to liability. The factors considered by the courts to determine whether to pierce the corporate veil include; commingling of funds and other assets, unauthorized diversion of corporate funds to use other than the benefit of the corporation and contracting with another with intent to avoid performance by use of a corporate entity as a shield against personal liability.…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    CAPITAL LTD, an analysis into the division of powers between the members of a company and its board of directors was completed as well as the protection of interests of a company’s creditors. This case touched on these two issues in the context of reduction of capital under section 256B of the Corporations Act (2001).…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ‘The director of a company owes a fiduciary duty to the company’. Do you agree with this statement?…

    • 2075 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Coca

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The banks sold off the shares, along with a collection of Maserati and Ferrari cars that had been imported by the directors under a side business, to recover their own debts. Investors shouldered $630 million in losses.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Having an officer repay the loan from the company, and then renewing it is considered as a related party transaction. This would be a type of window dressing that is allowed as it has to be recorded on the financial statements released to stakeholders. The repayment of the treasurer and renewing of the loan would have to be documented in the account the day the transaction happened. This would only temporarily benefit the financial statements and would have little to no impact on the financial…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    liability or responsibility

    • 3463 Words
    • 14 Pages

    After the South Sea Bubble question start to be raise about the ability and motivation of the director of such a company to conduct the oversight of the company asset in an honest manner. This problem was one of the reasons for the development of financial…

    • 3463 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays