Preview

Kings Mountain Distillery Case

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1190 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Kings Mountain Distillery Case
1. All costs to “produce” the whiskey should be included in the cost of inventory.

- Raw materials like water, corn, barley malt, rye
- Other indirect material used in the production process
- Cost of barrels used in the aging process
- Labor and supplies of chemical lab
- Direct labor costs, e.g. of employees/operators working in the factory
- Depreciation of plant and warehouse equipment
- Building expenses for factory and warehouse
- Cost of filling the whiskey in bottles

All these costs are more or less directly related to the manufacture of liquor and should form a part of manufacturing expenses which should be charged to the cost of finished goods produced.

2. In the given current situation Kings Mountain Distillery charges the cost of barrels to the income statement in the year when the barrels are purchased.
If KMD would charge the cost of barrels to inventory, then only the costs of the inventory sold would be charged to the COGS (cost of goods sold).
For the year of 1996, we have the following situation:

- opening inventory is 172,000 barrels
- barrels purchased 63,000 pieces
- closing inventory 192,000 barrels
 number of barrels sold: 172,000 + 63,000 - 192,000 = 43,000 barrels.
 This means only the cost of 43,000 barrels would be charged to COGS.
 The given cost for one barrel is 89,- USD: 43,000 x 89 = 3,827,000 USD
 According to the income statement the cost of barrels in 1996 was 5,607,000 USD
 This means the COGS would decrease by 1,780,000 USD and the net income would increase by the same amount. The “new” net income would be: 598,000 USD
 Also, the inventory account would increase by 1,780,000 USD

3. I would not recommend that KMD uses the accounting method of capitalizing and depreciating the barrel costs. The barrels are part of the manufacturing process of the whiskey and directly identified with it, which means that these costs are a direct cost of production. Usually machines are not directly

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Kingsford Charcoal Case

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Kingsford Charcoal was first started in the 1920’s by the famous Henry Ford, he created an innovative idea that used wood scraps to turn into charcoal briquettes that would burn longer and hotter than normal wood, a lumberman that was also related to Ford named E.G. Kingsford helped build the first briquettes plant and help get the business started up and commercialized, not too soon after it was bought by an investment group then in 1973 it was purchased by a company called Clorox. As of June 2000 the company Kingsford had 5 plants in the United States with each of those plants exceeding costs of 20 million dollars. The briquettes were packaged into different bags according to their specialty; some were just regular briquettes while others had lighter fluid in them that made them easier to start and user friendly. With the latter product being more expensive, there products were sold in 3 different sizes, 10 pound, 20 pound, and 48 pound bags for consumer reasons. The instant light was sold in 8 pound, 15 pound and 30 pound bags. Kingsford was an integral part to the Clorox Company; it was the leading manufacturer of charcoal and also had the most revenue of all the companies that were part of Clorox. Being part of barbequing Kingsford was a seasonal company with nearly 60 percent of their purchases being between start of spring and to the start of fall, with sells dipping down after that. Kingsford made sure that there product would be in the most viewed parts of the stores that they were sold in, they were put in the end of aisles so that you didn’t have to go deep into the aisle to be reminded that you might need to get charcoal, they wanted it to catch everyone’s eyes, the reason they were able to achieve that display was because there good relationship that they had with the retailers. Dealing with a company that is very seasonal and deals with weather to predict good sales is a big weakness, if they didn’t have good weather on…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Acc202 Wk 1 Assgnment 1

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The three main components of product cost for a manufacturing entity are direct materials, direct labor, and manufacturing overhead.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kingsford Case

    • 1312 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Climate * P&G tried to acquire Clorox in 1957. Gov. objected to prevent a Monopoly. * 1980’s charcoal category was growing * # of barbeque events: * 1987: 1.4 B * 1995: 2.7 B * 2000: 3 B *…

    • 1312 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    RSM222 Midterm

    • 1583 Words
    • 9 Pages

    3. Using the variable costing method, which of the following costs are assigned to inventory?…

    • 1583 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ACC 2203 Study Sheet

    • 2272 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Manufacturing Overhead. These product costs are attached to each unit until the units are sold, at…

    • 2272 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sample Exam 324 3

    • 2435 Words
    • 20 Pages

    Upon completion, the acid is poured into 1-litre containers and sent to the distribution centre. The cost of each container is $0.175 and transportation costs are $0.025 per litre.…

    • 2435 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kingsford Case Summary

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages

    To improve its softening situation, I believe that Kingsford should increase prices and shift its spending from sales promotion to media marketing in order to improve Kingsford’s profit in the short term and invest more in R&D to create new products in the long term.…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    South Dakota Microbrewery

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The gross margin and gross margin percentage under allocation based on direct-labor hours for Buffalo Ale, Bismark Bock and Four Heads Stout is $103.54 and 19%, $228.21 and 40% and $234.84 and 39%, respectively. The gross margin and gross margin percentage under activity based costing for Buffalo Ale, Bismark Bock and Four Heads Stout is $236.82 and 43%, -$39.5 and -6.9% and $225.51 and 37%. Calculations can be found in Appendix B.…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mcauslan Brewing Co. Case

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages

    manager, so that in the future the right personnel would be hired and trained correctly.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dow Chemical Company HW

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. The method of determining cost for each subsidiary varies among LIFO, FIFO, and average cost.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Brand plays a key role in the beer-purchasing process, along with taste, price, special occasion, brand image, authenticity, and tradition.…

    • 995 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mating Habits of Elk

    • 6769 Words
    • 28 Pages

    ------------------------------------------------- Top of Form | | | | | | Annual | Interim | | | | | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | Period End Date | 03/31/2011 | 03/31/2010 | 03/31/2009 | 03/31/2008 | 03/31/2007 | | | | | | | Stmt Source | Tanshin | Yuho | Yuho | Yuho | Yuho | Stmt Source Date | 05/11/2011 | 06/25/2010 | 06/24/2009 | 06/25/2008 | 06/25/2007 |…

    • 6769 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Shell Gabon Case Study

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. The UOC is calculated by dividing the total operating cost, excluding exploration, depreciation, and depletion by the barrels produced. In the case of RDS not all activities can be traced directly to a barrel of oil. There are departments such as Human Resource Management and Business Management that are not directly related to this measure. It makes sense for RDS to use barrels as the primary cost driver due to the large cost of the Production Management department. The barrel measurement is directly related to production related costs, and production related costs are the largest percentage of total operating expenses. See the UOC calculation below.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics